I still really want to try a Plus at some point (if my knee ever functions properly again), very intrigued by the new ski too. I'd also like to add my compliments on the graphics. Really impressed.
Mostly posting a random question for @VISHNU
... why no 177 Wide/Wide+? Asking because I'm pretty sure the ski question I get asked the most via my various DMs is Wide vs Magnus 102 (/other mid-fat, recently Reckoner 102 pops up a lot)... and often it's because people want a wider ski but don't want a 183 (or at least don't think they do). I get the addition of a longer size for bigger guys but I also know for sure that 177 (+/-2cm) is the best selling length for lots of (most?) brands and similarly, that brands don't sell too many skis above a 183... so just curious really.