Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

November the 3rd...

profile picture
Jeff_Lo
Posts: 5809 - Karma: 263
Just curious around here will be tuning in between Canon and RED.  And who has there checkbooks ready?

It's a big day!  I can't wait.
Oct 24 2011 1:49PM
0 0
profile picture
Jeff_Lo
Posts: 5809 - Karma: 263
it's not at 3p.m.

It's at 6 PST for announcement
and 7 PST for ordering

But Nov 3rd does have a number and he said in contrast to Canon, 3 is better than 2. 
Nov 3 2011 4:58PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,003
that was referring to the canon release, should have said that...

another good quote from reduser


"Originally Posted by Josh Beadle
Canon EOS 300C: good enough to shoot Porn"
^^^^^^^^^
"Any SD camera would be good enough. Do you really need to see stretch marks, cellulite, razor bumps, herpes lesions, genital warts, and ass pimples in HD? Sexy!"
Nov 3 2011 5:01PM
0 0
profile picture
Jeff_Lo
Posts: 5809 - Karma: 263
Haha clever bunch.

While I'll get a RED, I'm not a fan of the knocking of the Canon.  While it will probably be inferior to the RED, its still going to be the choice of many, and probably most, why? 

Manufacturing and numbers.  More people will beable to get there hands on it and faster.
Nov 3 2011 5:11PM
0 0
profile picture
TWoods
Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,385
When is the Canon announcement supposed to be? 4?
Nov 3 2011 5:21PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61110 - Karma: 118,334
yeah, engadget has us covered

http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/02/the-canon-hollywood-event-is-tomorrow-get-your-liveblog-here/
Nov 3 2011 5:33PM
0 0
profile picture
S.C
Posts: 3068 - Karma: 2,281
I'd be more exited if there was something coming out under 3 grand, but still I'm fucking stoked
Nov 3 2011 5:40PM
0 0
profile picture
bearsbowl37
Posts: 71 - Karma: 9
okay, rising sun.. sorry

after reading this thread, not really knowing shit unless its about my dslr that i use consistently, i feel like you are contributing nothing to this thread. you are just throwing out shit that you may "think" will be announced, but seriously man. look whos talking. evan, landis and jeff are much more knowledgeable than you are, or that you think you are. you are contributing nothing but shit that doesn't even matter at this point. #rant

done.
Nov 3 2011 5:50PM
0 0
profile picture
Childstar.
Posts: 1947 - Karma: 2,212
DONT YOU EVER SPEAK LIKE THAT TO HIM!!!!!!

Nov 3 2011 5:52PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61110 - Karma: 118,334
ooohh shiitt
Nov 3 2011 6:02PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,003
we're live in hollywood!

http://www.engadget.com/2011/11/03/the-canon-hollywood-event-liveblog/?sort=newest&refresh=120
Nov 3 2011 6:10PM
0 0
profile picture
Childstar.
Posts: 1947 - Karma: 2,212
there taking to long to show the camera :0
Nov 3 2011 6:11PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61110 - Karma: 118,334
those lenses look expensive...
Nov 3 2011 6:15PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,003
the c300 is official!

[img]http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/201111035814.jpg[/img]
Nov 3 2011 6:15PM
0 0
profile picture
lukewalnuts
Posts: 2730 - Karma: 152
[img]http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/201111035805.jpg[/img]
Nov 3 2011 6:15PM
0 0
profile picture
Mkvackay
Posts: 1903 - Karma: 5,460
jesus christ
Nov 3 2011 6:16PM
0 0
profile picture
Jacuse
Posts: 1792 - Karma: 1,549
very compact
Nov 3 2011 6:16PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,003
damnit!

Click for larger image
Nov 3 2011 6:17PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,003
quoting to make it work
Nov 3 2011 6:17PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,003
[img]http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/201111035819.jpg[/img]

quote this to show off the new canon PL primes, mmmm. could be pretty sweet lenses!
Nov 3 2011 6:18PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,003
*EF mount primes too
Nov 3 2011 6:19PM
0 0
profile picture
the.cheat
Posts: 2859 - Karma: 171
are some of those eos lenses? looks like a ton...
Nov 3 2011 6:20PM
0 0
profile picture
horner
Posts: 2439 - Karma: 1,578
People are planning on buying a camera that they have never shot with or even seen footage or specs from yet? give me a break.
Nov 3 2011 6:20PM
0 0
profile picture
andstuff
Posts: 1118 - Karma: 61
I like the body design except for that shitty looking viewfinder. It looks identical to the ones found on $100 handycams...

Otherwise, stoked! Those lenses look like Canon CP2s...
Nov 3 2011 6:22PM
0 0
profile picture
S.C
Posts: 3068 - Karma: 2,281
looks pretty cool for sure! Curious to see the specs/test footy
Nov 3 2011 6:25PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,003
and it sounds like they nailed the new XF codec down (50mbps 422)
Nov 3 2011 6:26PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61110 - Karma: 118,334
http://www.dvinfo.net/article/acquisition/canon-eos/canon-usa-announces-cinema-eos-c300-and-eos-c300-pl-cameras.html



canon made an f3, for almost $2000 more.... whoop dee do...
Nov 3 2011 6:43PM
0 0
profile picture
andstuff
Posts: 1118 - Karma: 61
I am disappoint.
Nov 3 2011 6:50PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,003
same, but are those specs confirmed?
Nov 3 2011 6:57PM
0 0
profile picture
plorr
Posts: 3131 - Karma: 529
This was WAY overhyped. Really nothing revolutionary. But people will probably still be scooping these up left and right come January.
Nov 3 2011 7:12PM
0 0
profile picture
andstuff
Posts: 1118 - Karma: 61
I was hoping it would be closer to the fs100 price point just so I could pick up a used fs100 while everyone flocks to this overpriced F3.
Nov 3 2011 7:13PM
0 0
profile picture
TWoods
Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,385
A camera that's borderline irrelevant the day it's released.
Nov 3 2011 7:19PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,003
again, I'm not trusting any specs until engadget posts them. DVinfo and Dan Carr (who just copy pasted DVinfo's article into his blog) don't have any inside edge on this. If they did, engadget would have seen it
Nov 3 2011 7:22PM
0 0
profile picture
[~_~]
Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273
Hahaha.

I'd still rather have an fs100 over this. And for a third of the price!
Nov 3 2011 7:26PM
0 0
profile picture
horner
Posts: 2439 - Karma: 1,578
Not at all. True professionals will buy this camera and make money with it. Irrelevant? Nope. Everyone is just mad because they can't buy a $15,000 camera for $4,000... Like these camera companies owe everyone an amazing camera at a cheap price point.
Nov 3 2011 7:28PM
0 0
profile picture
plorr
Posts: 3131 - Karma: 529
Completely off topic.

But why do you have two usernames?!
Nov 3 2011 7:31PM
0 0
profile picture
TWoods
Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,385
In the grand scheme of things, who are they after? People that can't afford to shoot RED?

That's more accesible now than ever, and probably even more so after tonight.

This is just speculation, but I don't see 1080 being a worthwhile resolution for much longer. I realize that there's things I don't know about this camera, but to me, the price tag combined with the limited frame rates and resolution, when compared to cameras like the F3, FS100, and AF100 to me makes this camera seem pretty unnecessary.

If you don't think that's true, I'd love to hear your take on it.
Nov 3 2011 7:33PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,003
rumor is that there are not one, but two bodies.
Nov 3 2011 7:35PM
0 0
profile picture
S.C
Posts: 3068 - Karma: 2,281
A DSLR IS BEING RELEASED! SO STOKED!
Nov 3 2011 7:35PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61110 - Karma: 118,334
I think one big advantage of the new c300 is the codec and the new cine lenses. The actual camera itself is cool and have some okay features (nothing new, lots of old stuff) but the actual codec is 422 10 bit like the f3 and then the new cine lenses are pretty sweet too.
Nov 3 2011 7:36PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,003
pretty sure its 4:2:2 8 bit?
Nov 3 2011 7:37PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61110 - Karma: 118,334
is it 8? bunch of nerds on dvxuser kept flipping out saying it was 10bit. if its 8bit then meh, f3 is 10bit.
Nov 3 2011 7:38PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,003
im on reduser and engadget right now, link to the dvxuser thread?
Nov 3 2011 7:40PM
0 0
profile picture
S.C
Posts: 3068 - Karma: 2,281
[img]http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/201111036051.jpg[/img]

...
Nov 3 2011 7:41PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61110 - Karma: 118,334
http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthread.php?261743-Rumor-Canon-4k-super35-camera/page96

it blew up from like page 60 something to 90 in an hr or less.
Nov 3 2011 7:41PM
0 0
profile picture
andstuff
Posts: 1118 - Karma: 61
Don't get me wrong; I'm not THAT guy who complains that he can't get a RED Scarlet for $2k.

My criticism is that Canon hyped this up for a month, claiming it was a game changer. It's not far off from an F3, and it certainly isn't anything we haven't already seen. Do I feel entitled to some mind blowing product? Not at all. Is it a nice camera? Definitely. I'm sure it will have a solid presence in the industry. I'm just saying that the product they revealed is inconsistent with their hype. I'm sure it's great and all, but it's far from a "game changer."
Nov 3 2011 7:42PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,003
inb4 some giant elephant in the room gets dropped and we all have to take back what we said ;)
Nov 3 2011 7:44PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61110 - Karma: 118,334
[img]http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/201111036083.jpg[/img]




....



what the FUCK is that on the left?
Nov 3 2011 7:46PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61110 - Karma: 118,334
work?

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/11/201111036083.jpg
Nov 3 2011 7:47PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,003
told you, the second camera!
Nov 3 2011 7:47PM
0 0
profile picture
horner
Posts: 2439 - Karma: 1,578
To keep it simple, there will be things about this camera that people will love, so they'll buy it. If it produces nice images, they'll buy it. It may seem irrelevant to you, but it's completely relevant to many others. Also, 1080p still more than acceptable. For how long? who knows.

Not everyone strives to shoot on a RED for everything, whether it's a one or an epic. Just because budget allows, it doesn't mean it's the right camera for every job. RED cameras aren't the holy grail or the end all be all. Unfortunately, too many people think that.

RED has this nasty hold on a lot of people, God of all things camera.
Nov 3 2011 7:49PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)