It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
So I have a cousin who is running for district attorney and he wants me to shoot some campaign adds for him, just stuff that would be online. So what I'm asking is how much should I charge per video I make for him? They should all be around 30 seconds to a minute, any suggestions for how much?
But, I have been looking for Pro I backs only. I read somewhere (random internet source) that they aren't interchangeable which makes sense because some other components aren't interchangeable between Pro I and Pro II.
Just to verify, are the backs cross compatible between the Pro I and II or not?
Just redesigned my website. Anybody care to give me some feedback/suggestions? I know absolutely nothing about web design but I'm relatively happy with it. Link is in my signature.
jibcrew1So I have a cousin who is running for district attorney and he wants me to shoot some campaign adds for him, just stuff that would be online. So what I'm asking is how much should I charge per video I make for him? They should all be around 30 seconds to a minute, any suggestions for how much?
Depends on what do you have to shoot and how professional your work will look, also depends if you wanna charge a really lower price than usual cuz it's your cousin. But if it's an easy job I usually charge something around 20$/ hour.
What's up guys, I'm looking for a fast 35 for my 60D, and I definitely want to go vintage since I don't need AF for this one. Under $150 would be nice. Any suggestions?
ForcilloWhat's up guys, I'm looking for a fast 35 for my 60D, and I definitely want to go vintage since I don't need AF for this one. Under $150 would be nice. Any suggestions?
I have a Canon T3i and mostly shoot stills, anyways I was looking at buying a Tokina 11-16mm and was wondering if anyone could tell me if that would be worth while considering I don't film much?
steeze_pizzaI have a Canon T3i and mostly shoot stills, anyways I was looking at buying a Tokina 11-16mm and was wondering if anyone could tell me if that would be worth while considering I don't film much?
steeze_pizzaI have a Canon T3i and mostly shoot stills, anyways I was looking at buying a Tokina 11-16mm and was wondering if anyone could tell me if that would be worth while considering I don't film much?
I have the T3i and Tokina and I love the Tokina for video but I think it can be a little soft for photos. Pretty handy for a lot of shots, like long exposures and some landscapes, but I use my Tamron 17-50 way more for shooting photos.
gavinrudyI have the T3i and Tokina and I love the Tokina for video but I think it can be a little soft for photos. Pretty handy for a lot of shots, like long exposures and some landscapes, but I use my Tamron 17-50 way more for shooting photos.
I never had the Tamron when I was shooting Canon, but as long as you stop down a bit the 11-16 is pretty sharp.
Lens question here. I'd like to get more serious with portrait work, maybe do some senior pictures for my brother and friends. I'm looking at the 50mm since i use a t4i, but I can't decide on which one. From what I've read the 2.5 is a little sharper and has a better looking bokeh because of the extra aperture blade. I can find this on ebay for $150-200, while the ol 1.8 is around $80 used. Is this extra money worth it? Another reason i'm leaning towards the 2.5 is because I've been itching to have a macro lens for a while.
connorwyckoffLens question here. I'd like to get more serious with portrait work, maybe do some senior pictures for my brother and friends. I'm looking at the 50mm since i use a t4i, but I can't decide on which one. From what I've read the 2.5 is a little sharper and has a better looking bokeh because of the extra aperture blade. I can find this on ebay for $150-200, while the ol 1.8 is around $80 used. Is this extra money worth it? Another reason i'm leaning towards the 2.5 is because I've been itching to have a macro lens for a while.
I would go for the 1.8, if not the 1.4. If you just want to do portraits, I would stay away from specialty lenses
If you had to do it all over again, would you still go with the 5DmkIII, or would you go a different route? If you would go a different route, which would it be and why?
I've been looking for a full frame DSLR for photos only and cannot decide one way or another. I have no worthwhile glass for my current Canon so I am not stuck with my feet firmly planted in any camp.
anybody have any recommendations for a cr2/raw to jpeg converter that will slightly process images? while i would love to edit and make all my pictures look good, im studying abroad and it takes a long time, and a lot of these go up on facebook where i dont really care about quality, and auto in lightroom kinda looks like shit imo.
Blake.Panybody have any recommendations for a cr2/raw to jpeg converter that will slightly process images? while i would love to edit and make all my pictures look good, im studying abroad and it takes a long time, and a lot of these go up on facebook where i dont really care about quality, and auto in lightroom kinda looks like shit imo.
if you're too lazy for lightroom i think you're shit out of luck
how long does it take for the snow outside of an icerink to melt after they put it outside? also, how much snow is there normally? enough to fill up a truck bed and trailer?
from one dump of the zamboni, it will probably be a truck beds worth... It will probably take a good 8 hours to melt completely....
Blake.Panybody have any recommendations for a cr2/raw to jpeg converter that will slightly process images? while i would love to edit and make all my pictures look good, im studying abroad and it takes a long time, and a lot of these go up on facebook where i dont really care about quality, and auto in lightroom kinda looks like shit imo.
Blake.Panybody have any recommendations for a cr2/raw to jpeg converter that will slightly process images? while i would love to edit and make all my pictures look good, im studying abroad and it takes a long time, and a lot of these go up on facebook where i dont really care about quality, and auto in lightroom kinda looks like shit imo.
Haha what gavin said, why the fuck are you shooting in raw then?
If you figure out all the right numbers (latency, timing, hz, etc) you can find 2x8gb on newegg as well. But regardless you'll be looking at $140-160 for 16gb of ram, which is a good deal.
Yeah apple says those older versions don't support 16gb but they definitely do, the OG OSX on the machine might not have but everything is 64bit and the only reason ram isnt supported on a computer is if its 32bit and only can use 4gb of ram. Definitely toss in 16, it makes a difference. I run my mb air with 8gb cause thats the max you can do, but otherwise ive always done 16gb in the past 3 years or so.
