Womans rights?

Posts: 22441 - Karma: 2,805

Karma: 2,805

Posts: 22441

@th1337

This sentence came out of no where, and it was more or less directed at the OP. Not you...but you still should rethink your assumption of women being stay at home moms and not getting compensation. Being a mom is a full time job.

Jun 18 2009 11:10AM

0 0

Posts: 14217 - Karma: 2,891

Karma: 2,891

Posts: 14217

Crazy Fool

or the stay at home mom could stop being a stay at home mom, get a job, and then both parents could afford a nanny to take care of their kids while they were working to bring money into everyone's lives.

Jun 18 2009 11:32AM

0 0

deleted5

Posts: 14507 - Karma: 13,500

Karma: 13,500

Posts: 14507

Crazy Fool

ummmm ok when you murder some one there dead. when you rape some one yes it bad but killing some one or trying to is much worse than raping them.

Jun 18 2009 11:34AM

0 0

Posts: 8629 - Karma: 606

Karma: 606

Posts: 8629

Crazy Fool

ummm most women work full time and still nanny everyone including their husband.

Jun 18 2009 11:34AM

0 0

Posts: 8629 - Karma: 606

Karma: 606

Posts: 8629

Crazy Fool

you know why this is wrong.

how many people spend the rest of their lives wondering what they did to deserve being shot?

Entity$
Karma : 8186
3022 Posts
Addict

Jun 16 2009
1:06:23
Quote Reply

Wow, if any of you have ever gotten close enough to a girl that she would actually feel comfortable telling you that she was held down forcefully against her will, by at least one worthless piece of shit, and raped forcefully and painfully and forced to just take it, forced to have her dignity taken forced to be confined, her freedom of her body taken away, forced to let some ass hole in her forced into something like that then you would realize that the peneltys are not harsh enough. Having the courage to tell anyone that is amazing, let alone the police or your family. It just isn't fucking right, so just shut up. The emotinal damage that comes with that can last a fucking lifetime. It should never fuckig happen but the reality is it does, and often goes unreported because I for one wouldn't want anyone to know that I was held against my will and raped by fucking strangers, all dignity taken away from me. It makes someone feel worthless, depressed, and the lowest of the low for a long time, it isn't something you get over, it isn't something to be taken lighty.

You shouldn't take life too seriously, you'll never get out of it alive.

^^this is raw truth. and unless you're a rape victim, i would just shut the fuck up all of you.

Jun 18 2009 11:39AM

0 0

Posts: 14217 - Karma: 2,891

Karma: 2,891

Posts: 14217

Crazy Fool

what the fuck kind of a statement is that? shut the fuck up.

Jun 18 2009 11:40AM

0 0

Posts: 8629 - Karma: 606

Karma: 606

Posts: 8629

Crazy Fool

its a statement of truth. you're such a benign piece of atomic waste.

Jun 18 2009 11:41AM

0 0

Posts: 14217 - Karma: 2,891

Karma: 2,891

Posts: 14217

Crazy Fool

you are so fucking stupid. you cannot work full time and nanny anyone at the same time. what, you think that a woman is so fucking amazing that she can be working and keeping an eye on her children all the time, while her husband is at work just sitting around watching tv and scratching his balls? shut the fuck up.

Jun 18 2009 11:47AM

0 0

Posts: 8629 - Karma: 606

Karma: 606

Posts: 8629

Crazy Fool

wow, you really need to learn how to use your brain.

Jun 18 2009 11:47AM

0 0

feihlination

Posts: 8356 - Karma: 1,084

Karma: 1,084

Posts: 8356

Crazy Fool

i will blindly agree with k-rob because he wrote an terrific 2-line essay about emancipation. i really respect women, dont get me wrong, but its funny that they fought for years that they dont have to stay at home and now youre defending that like it had been a right whicht was taken ilegally from you.

Jun 18 2009 11:48AM

0 0

Posts: 14217 - Karma: 2,891

Karma: 2,891

Posts: 14217

Crazy Fool

you keep saying all this shit with nothing to back it up. "women work full time and babysit their entire family at the same time. it's a statement of truth. your brain doesn't work."

Jun 18 2009 11:49AM

0 0

Posts: 8629 - Karma: 606

Karma: 606

Posts: 8629

Crazy Fool

no, i dont want to stay at home, no i will not stay at home,and damned if youre gonna make me fucking cook you dinner every fucking night while you watch tv, and while youre watching it, ill be washing dishes too and runnign the household

you want your dumb bitch slave, go find her because shes probably the girl dressed like a slut whos defecating on my mother and grandmother who fought for me not to pick up after lazy slobs.

and you know im fortunate enough to have a boyfriend who most of the time wont let me cook because he has respect and he takes fucking care because relationships are about mutual respect.

and i somehow highly doubt any of you have the patience or common sense to have respect for a woman and therefore have no one to sleep beside you in your cold dank abyss of a bed.

Jun 18 2009 11:53AM

0 0

Posts: 8629 - Karma: 606

Karma: 606

Posts: 8629

Crazy Fool

no because i dont see other women do it all the time, work 9 to 5, if not more, and you know cook dinner every night and then clean the dishes and barely have time then to clean the house because no one else does shit. i know these women and i see them every day. its not moronic its fucking real.

Jun 18 2009 11:54AM

0 0

zepscratch

Posts: 3517 - Karma: 36

Karma: 36

Posts: 3517

Addict

haha. coming from someone who has brain the size of squirrel!

Jun 18 2009 11:55AM

0 0

Posts: 14217 - Karma: 2,891

Karma: 2,891

Posts: 14217

Crazy Fool

you make women sound like they are incompetent at choosing the right person to marry and have children with. it's not as if women all over america are being forced to marry lazy slobs.

Jun 18 2009 11:56AM

0 0

Posts: 22441 - Karma: 2,805

Karma: 2,805

Posts: 22441

@th1337

And that's fine, no one is stopping her from doing that. But there is a certain pride that comes with being a parent, and some moms or dads would rather be the one to raise their children rather than a nanny, someone who is not a birth parent. Every situation is different.

Jun 18 2009 11:56AM

0 0

Posts: 8629 - Karma: 606

Karma: 606

Posts: 8629

Crazy Fool

its ok hed rather pawn off his own responsibilities than be a parent worth having

Jun 18 2009 11:57AM

0 0

Posts: 14217 - Karma: 2,891

Karma: 2,891

Posts: 14217

Crazy Fool

right, well the same as i would never marry a woman who couldn't pull her own weight, women shouldn't marry men who won't pull theirs. that's just common sense. their is obviously something wrong in the head of whatever woman says to herself "my female ancestors fought for my rights. to hell with that, i'm going to marry a piece of shit."

Jun 18 2009 12:00PM

0 0

Posts: 14217 - Karma: 2,891

Karma: 2,891

Posts: 14217

Crazy Fool

oh, so now every family that hires a nanny while the parents work full time to provide for their children is shirking their responsibilities? you are a cunt.

Jun 18 2009 12:01PM

0 0

Posts: 8629 - Karma: 606

Karma: 606

Posts: 8629

Crazy Fool

how many average families have nanies?!

Jun 18 2009 12:02PM

0 0

Posts: 14217 - Karma: 2,891

Karma: 2,891

Posts: 14217

Crazy Fool

oh i'm sorry, i thought you had replied to snowbirdmilfs reply to my comment about two working parents being able to afford a nanny. i thought we were still on the subject of having a nanny, in which you had said that if i were to get a nanny while i worked full time to provide for my family, i'd be an unfit father. but now that you've said "average families," i have no idea what we're talking about anymore. although i'm sure most families where the mother and father both work full time don't just leave their children at home alone.

Jun 18 2009 12:07PM

0 0

Posts: 8629 - Karma: 606

Karma: 606

Posts: 8629

Crazy Fool

i still dont know how many two full time working average parents have the money to afford the nanny after all the expenses.

Jun 18 2009 12:09PM

0 0

Posts: 14217 - Karma: 2,891

Karma: 2,891

Posts: 14217

Crazy Fool

wow, that would be comparable to me saying i still don't know how one man manages to provide enough money for a stay at home mother, children, a mortgage, taxes, or anything else that a man has to pay for to support that kind of family.

Jun 18 2009 12:12PM

0 0

Posts: 22441 - Karma: 2,805

Karma: 2,805

Posts: 22441

@th1337

This is true, in today's society both parents do have to work to make ends meet. There is definitely not as many stay at home parents as there used to be. But that still doesn't mean they can afford to pay a nanny, they're fucking expensive as hell.

Jun 18 2009 12:19PM

0 0

Posts: 8629 - Karma: 606

Karma: 606

Posts: 8629

Crazy Fool

well, you dont have to pay your wife an hourly wage. daycare is cheaper. im just telling you nannies are expensive, and theyre not just babysitters, and perhaps i associated a nanny with bad parenting because people who travel the world probably dont have time and shouldnt have kids.

and yes it is usually rather difficult to support a stay at home mom, unless you have a nice income. but its kind of hard when a woman has a child every two years to go to work all the time, so a lot of our parents stayed home for about 6-9 years taking care of the babies on mat. leave and etc.

and because this is such an issue this is why a lot of offices are now having daycares in the building and why the government regulates daycare prices in certain places.

two people making 30gs a year dont always have enough money to give their kids anything but each others hand me downs. especially if they have debt.

but you know, a lot of what goes on in our society is based on peoples home lives and environment. and call me out if you will, and say i learned nothing studying sociology and psychology and having had a life of experience myself.

24 hr nannies often lead to children with emotional issues. a lot of kids never outgrown their sense of abandonment in a lot of regular non nanny, stay at home households. and a lot of depression is stemmed from thoughts a child created in their mind about themselves at 6 years old, through their experiences with their first tastes of life.

a lot of you throw around insults for no reason, without backing or caring whether it bugs someone else. but im personally offended by gender issues, and i dont care if you all have fun throwing shit at me. a lot of you are uneducated, and just stupid, or in high school, so im pretty one up on all of those things.

Jun 18 2009 12:22PM

0 0

Posts: 14217 - Karma: 2,891

Karma: 2,891

Posts: 14217

Crazy Fool

but let's look at it this way:
there are men who provide all the monetary income for their families, and manage to afford it, while the woman may not provide any monetary income at all, but stays at home and takes care of the kids while dad is out providing for everyone. so everything can be paid for by one person.
if both parents are working full time jobs, and the income of one parent can fulfill all of the expectations that it would have to fulfill in the previous family, then it would be safe to assume that the income of another parent could probably afford a nanny. i'm not saying that each parents pays for eahc thing respectively, they would obviously split the expenses between each of their incomes, but either way, only maybe about half of the income goes toward all the things that it would go toward in a family with a stay at home mother. which leaves about half for a nanny, and one would assume that you can find a nanny who can be paid for an an entire full time income, hopefully less than that.

so it's either one parent is out making the money for the entire family, or two parents are out making the money for the entire family and a nanny. either way, any parents with money sense and a decent job would be able to figure out how to pay for the things they need to. if they can't do that, there is a welfare system. the simple fact is that you have to be prepared to provide for a family before you start building one.

Jun 18 2009 12:30PM

0 0

Posts: 14217 - Karma: 2,891

Karma: 2,891

Posts: 14217

Crazy Fool

daycares fall into the same category as nannies, either way the parent is paying a lot of money to have someone else take care of their child while they are at work.
24 hour nannies are a pretty rare case. most people have jobs where work and family can be balanced. you get up, feed your kids, get them dressed, you either drive them to the daycare or leave them with a annny, you go to work until the evening(or perhaps on of the parents comes home a bit earlier, if that's affordable), then the parents come home and spend time with their families until it's time for bed. it's not a complicated system, the only part that is complicated is the money, and either way that should have been figured out before the kids were born.
as far as gender issues go, the topic of a stay at home mom isn't a gender issue in the slightest. it might've been, back when women couldn't work, but now either parent can be a stay at home parent, or both parents can work. i don't like to argue about gender issues, because it's not an issue where i live, in canada. right now, the only thing a woman can't do is be included in the draft, and that's not a bad thing.

Jun 18 2009 12:43PM

0 0

Posts: 22441 - Karma: 2,805

Karma: 2,805

Posts: 22441

@th1337

I totally understand what you're saying. But, you're also saying that a mom should get a job so she can create a job for someone to look after her own kids (she is going to be giving MORE than half of her paycheck to a nanny, unless she's well....rich). Again, nannies are expensive and if you're going to get one, you're not going to go for some run of the mill chick who has a degree that says she can take care of kids. You're not going to hire someone who can't look after your family as well as you. The people who get nannies get them because they don't have enough time in their day to give any attention to their kids. Which is a problem in itself. Those kids are attention starved and can only get what they need from someone who isn't their mom or dad.

And you're exactly right in that two people should not start a family unless they are financially stable enough to do so. Just as they shouldn't get married unless they are emotionally ready to do so.

Jun 18 2009 12:51PM

0 0

Posts: 22441 - Karma: 2,805

Karma: 2,805

Posts: 22441

@th1337

Day care is much cheaper, trust me. They have programs such as head start for this, starting at age 3. Onto preschool, which gets them ready for kindergarten. Like I said, nannies are expensive, and different than day care. (and I didn't read the rest of your post here, just the first line, sowwy!)

Jun 18 2009 12:52PM

0 0

Posts: 14217 - Karma: 2,891

Karma: 2,891

Posts: 14217

Crazy Fool

oh i'm not saying a mom SHOULD get a job, just that she can if she chooses to because there are other people who will take care of her kids while she's at work. it just an option. i'm sure a lot of kids might grow up a little better if their mom or dad stayed at home, i'm not sure, and i have nothing against it at all. it's not the choice i would make, but i don't have anything against other people making it. it's the assumption that a stay at home parent is doing a better job than the parent who is making the money that annoys me. i know plenty of families with stay at home moms, where the dad doesn't just go to work, come home, and then sit around ignoring his family. and any family where that does happen, the mom should have known who she was marrying before she married him, she can't say that she was forced into it or anything like that.

Jun 18 2009 1:07PM

0 0

Ben.

Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683

Karma: 683

Posts: 21463

@th1337

im not saying that the dads dont do anything, or that they are better. but i DO think that its a better environment for the kid with at least one stay at home parent.

my point was more towards the half of everything on divorce issue. its not like they are just sitting around because they arent in a literal job.

Jun 18 2009 1:22PM

0 0

MAPLE_SYRUP

Posts: 1910 - Karma: 68

Karma: 68

Posts: 1910

Insane

lol. this shit is really heating up.

keep it goin : )

Jun 18 2009 1:25PM

0 0

Posts: 14217 - Karma: 2,891

Karma: 2,891

Posts: 14217

Crazy Fool

day care is probably cheaper in most cases, because the care is divided between children, but it is still very expensive, as you are not only paying for the care of your children, but the facilities as well.

growing up, my sister and i were lucky enough have an after-school nanny, then we started going to another family's house after school, where a few of the other neighbourhood kids would also go (it was basically a daycare, but it felt more like going a friends house because all the kids were good friends and we basically grew up together for a few years, hard to explain but it didn't feel like a nanny or a daycare), then we went to a daycare at a facility, and that was alright but it wasn't very fun at all, and it was apparently more expensive than the previous situations. we still had plenty of time with our parents when they finished work, and then as soon as i was old enough to take care of myself i just took care of my sister as well until my parents finished work.
if my mom had stayed home, we wouldn't have as nice of a life as we do now, and she wouldn't have as great of a career as she does now. it might have been nice to hang out with my mom all day as a kid, but i think the daycares gave me a better social experience than i would have had with a stay at home mom. it's like homeschooling, in a way. sure, you might get better grades and get to hang out at home all day, but in the end you're missing out on that time with other people.

Jun 18 2009 1:32PM

0 0

deleted5

Posts: 14507 - Karma: 13,500

Karma: 13,500

Posts: 14507

Crazy Fool

so your saying you would rather die by being shot then raped?

Jun 18 2009 4:54PM

0 0