ON3P Jeffrey 100 vs ON3P Woodsman 100 vs Wildcat 101

QuantumlagI'm trying to decide between these two skis. I broke a pair of lines (shocked face) and I'm going to replace them. I'm definitely an expert skier so I ski a lot of bumps, trees and also like blasting groomers. I haven't done much in the park, but I really want to learn. I currently have Stockli Stormrider 88s and Wildcat 108s. Out of these 3 skis, which should I choose/why?

ON3P Jeffrey 100
ON3P Woodsman 100
Moment Wildcat 101

apc.frAll 3 skis are great.

The Jeffs are the most progressive, stiffish all mountain park ski. Strongest tail ime. Also the ski just wants to go FAST.

Wildcats are very slightly less progressive. Ime less stiff, especially in the tail. Waaaay better one hard groomers than the Jeff and better, ime, than the woodsman,

Woodmans are most directional, you can really push the tips comparatively. Feels "slower" than the Jeff, but not in a bad way. It's hard to explain, but basically the Jeff wants to striaghtline everything, the wildcats want to make a few turns and the woodsmans want all few more.

Which ski you want depends on what and where you'll be skiing, and how you want to ski it.

I'd say, if you like the wildcats and want a similar vibe get the smaller size.

If you want something more progressive and/or to charge extremely hard and/or to really get into the park go Jeff's.

From what you've said, it sounds like the woodsman ain't it.

colerichardmyersHaving been on the Jeff 100, in addition to actual stiff, heavier, more freeride skis, IME they aren't super fast skis that want to straight line everything. Sure they are fast for freestyle oriented skis, but are no means some charger. The woodsman is ON3P's "freeride ski" and would be suitable for larger and fewer turns and higher speeds. I'm going to guess ON3P would agree with that.

jumpman101On3p Jeff 100. Love mine I rip all mtn and some park love how they ski. They are soon going to make most likely a Jeff 92 for the next season

gustafsonkevin12They’re going to make a 92? Do you know if they’ll make a woodsman in that width as well?

gustafsonkevin12They’re going to make a 92? Do you know if they’ll make a woodsman in that width as well?

colerichardmyers92 Woodsman would be a killer for mid west and east coast.

GayWolf420I ski Kartel 108s @186cm (Now the Jeff) and just remounted my Woodsman 108s at 186cm with STH 16s. The Woodsman is an insane ski to ride. The right amount of meat on the bone, so to speak. It snaps in and out of turns soooo well. It’s a mean ski to ride for sure.

**This post was edited on Mar 2nd 2024 at 9:38:15pm

GayWolf420I ski Kartel 108s @186cm (Now the Jeff) and just remounted my Woodsman 108s at 186cm with STH 16s. The Woodsman is an insane ski to ride. The right amount of meat on the bone, so to speak. It snaps in and out of turns soooo well. Its a mean ski to ride for sure.

BenchhitterHey mate, I’m also trying to decide on some 3ps so hope you no mind if I jack this thread and ask you since you seem to have em all. I’ve never had a chance to try them. Trying to downsize my collection of shitty promo skis I hate and get one good honest resort ripper. Probably a woodsman 108.

would you say the Woodsman can kinda box in the same class as like Volkl Revolts, Fischer Rangers, Nordica Enforcers, Head Kores etc?

Looking for something that skis with some refinement but knows how to party. I really like damp, energetic, chargy. I generally like a stiffer ski but hate light+stiff, and esp hate planky park skis.