Member of the Month

profa_212
July, 2025

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Is line skis cool anymore?

profile picture
andreyer
Posts: 92 - Karma: 463
Line skis traveling circus is core asf and was my childhood but now everybody rides em and their social media is a lil bunk. Their skis delam and break pretty quickly, their new videos are okay and they have alot of social media skiers on their team. Open to all opinions but idrk what to think of them anymore.
3 years ago
6 10
profile picture
snowmosexual
Posts: 1941 - Karma: 10,090
yeah its super cool to spend hundreds on skis to have them fall apart
3 years ago
39 1
profile picture
r00kie
Posts: 5238 - Karma: 59,606
Line seems to have lost a lot of their identity as a brand. Pollard leaving was a huge loss and the quality issue hurts a lot. Bring back "Keep Skiing Weird" Line and skis like my old Step Ups that were fricken tanks and I'm a buyer. Also, you all should have been paying Andy way more all these years.
3 years ago
43 0
profile picture
supremeblientele
Posts: 991 - Karma: 5,738
3 years ago
20 0
profile picture
supremeblientele
Posts: 991 - Karma: 5,738
no, but they had a good run

its like k2's autistic sister brand now
3 years ago
32 2
profile picture
dwt802
Posts: 3389 - Karma: 33,412
Yes. It’s line skis of course they’re cool.
3 years ago
10 5
profile picture
supremeblientele
Posts: 991 - Karma: 5,738
ive only snapped 2 pairs of skis in my life, both lines
3 years ago
8 2
profile picture
dwt802
Posts: 3389 - Karma: 33,412
I’m guessing points actually need to be made here.

line skis is dope because:
- they pioneered freeskiing
- they still support traveling circus
- they actively give hundreds of skiers free and discounted skis
- they donate product to tons of events
- they support tons of projects
- they’re still weird compared to other ski brands despite the K2 ownership

it doesn’t matter if their durability is shit and they don’t have the same identity they used to but they’re is much worse. Like yeah we who ski hella shouldn’t buy lines bc of durability but they’re great for many people who ski less and don’t want to spend an arm and a leg. They still do great things for the community which shouldn’t be overlooked. Line skis is still cool.
3 years ago
42 1
profile picture
caveman31
Posts: 401 - Karma: 3,783
not core. they dont pay andy enough
3 years ago
25 0
profile picture
andreyer
Posts: 92 - Karma: 463
r00kieLine seems to have lost a lot of their identity as a brand. Pollard leaving was a huge loss and the quality issue hurts a lot. Bring back "Keep Skiing Weird" Line and skis like my old Step Ups that were fricken tanks and I'm a buyer. Also, you all should have been paying Andy way more all these years.


I back this statement heavy
3 years ago
6 0
profile picture
STEEZUS_CHRI5T
Posts: 3055 - Karma: 23,677
Remember when Line tried to make their fans pay for their team van instead of sponsoring their riders and doing it themselves? Yea their pretty cool
3 years ago
37 1
profile picture
brownetown
Posts: 505 - Karma: 4,988
Can’t speak to the quality of their skis but they do a ton for the culture. Every year Line would send free skis and merch to my uni’s ski and snowboard club so we could do giveaways and raffles and such, and they’d give us nice discount codes to send out to club members too. Always stoked on what we were doing and happy to contribute, big ups to them for that
3 years ago
12 0
profile picture
migidimigi
Posts: 460 - Karma: 3,333
Have you used their new skis like sakana, blade, blade optic and so on?
Sakanas are the most weird and inspiring skis I've had in last 5 years and skiing them is an absolute blast every time!
In my mind park skis have reached their peak and development is only incremental, look elsewhere and you find true innovation
r00kieLine seems to have lost a lot of their identity as a brand. Pollard leaving was a huge loss and the quality issue hurts a lot. Bring back "Keep Skiing Weird" Line and skis like my old Step Ups that were fricken tanks and I'm a buyer. Also, you all should have been paying Andy way more all these years.
3 years ago
2 1
profile picture
HypeBeast
Posts: 10097 - Karma: 76,795
Still cool enough to karma farm by shitting on Line. Y'all sound like a bunch of butthurt fanboys "wahh Eric pollard wahhhhhhh". This subject is getting to be as monotonous as "wHat sKi sHouLd i bUY?" It seems to be a great NS past time analogous to recommending ON3P for every ski gear question or saying "full tilt" every other post like a goddamn retard.

Line's durability can only be measured by the materials and construction of the skis themselves. Any anecdotal story of durability is the equivalent of a case report, which is the lowest reliable form of data. Every situation and every single aspect of that situation is different. Any ski can die in a day, and any ski can last years. It's purely situational. The only way to compare one ski to another is in a controlled environment with no other factors than the ski itself. Even then, each individual ski brand/model varies and even within each ski, there will be subtle differences. This durability testing would have to be tested tons of times to be certain and no one has the funds to do that. Maybe we should have demolition ranch do us a wildly unscientific test.

These discussions are dumb. Literally saw a durability post the other month comparing skis with the exact same bases saying one is more prone to core shots -_-
It's coincidence until proven otherwise folks.

If you think they're so shitty, then don't buy them. Simple. Or stop buying beer, weed, and/or coffee for a few months, and pony up the cash for skis you deem durable.


Tldr: durability arguments are stupid and irrational.
3 years ago
7 16
profile picture
Goretex_Vidal
Posts: 979 - Karma: 13,995
migidimigiHave you used their new skis like sakana, blade, blade optic and so on?
Sakanas are the most weird and inspiring skis I've had in last 5 years and skiing them is an absolute blast every time!
In my mind park skis have reached their peak and development is only incremental, look elsewhere and you find true innovation


I got Sakanas over the summer and they've been stupid fun to do big slash turns on berms. I've probably regressed as a skiier because of them because I'm just goofing off on them all the time.
3 years ago
6 0
profile picture
ski_salmon69
Posts: 1943 - Karma: 29,117
They’re cool other than tom wallisch pros
3 years ago
5 0
profile picture
r00kie
Posts: 5238 - Karma: 59,606
migidimigiHave you used their new skis like sakana, blade, blade optic and so on?
Sakanas are the most weird and inspiring skis I've had in last 5 years and skiing them is an absolute blast every time!
In my mind park skis have reached their peak and development is only incremental, look elsewhere and you find true innovation


I'd love to try a pair of Sakanas but I'm not sure I have a need for another carvy ski.
3 years ago
1 0
profile picture
Farmville420
Posts: 5220 - Karma: 67,783
r00kieLine seems to have lost a lot of their identity as a brand. Pollard leaving was a huge loss and the quality issue hurts a lot. Bring back "Keep Skiing Weird" Line and skis like my old Step Ups that were fricken tanks and I'm a buyer. Also, you all should have been paying Andy way more all these years.


Pollard was big but what about founder of Line and inventor of twin tips Jason Levinthal leaving? Feel like that was a little more major
3 years ago
6 0
profile picture
Newsheepers
Posts: 2170 - Karma: 4,281
If you still buy line is 2023 you're hopeless, and honestly who am I kidding your mom's paying for that shit ever since you saw jackson carstarter riding them on tiktok. But in that case you'll prolly never have an issue with them cuz you can't even slide a tube. So yes line is still cool to 10-12 year olds
3 years ago
3 8
profile picture
IsaacNW82
Posts: 780 - Karma: 6,776
Turd__AuthorityStill cool enough to karma farm by shitting on Line. Y'all sound like a bunch of butthurt fanboys "wahh Eric pollard wahhhhhhh". This subject is getting to be as monotonous as "wHat sKi sHouLd i bUY?" It seems to be a great NS past time analogous to recommending ON3P for every ski gear question or saying "full tilt" every other post like a goddamn retard.

Line's durability can only be measured by the materials and construction of the skis themselves. Any anecdotal story of durability is the equivalent of a case report, which is the lowest reliable form of data. Every situation and every single aspect of that situation is different. Any ski can die in a day, and any ski can last years. It's purely situational. The only way to compare one ski to another is in a controlled environment with no other factors than the ski itself. Even then, each individual ski brand/model varies and even within each ski, there will be subtle differences. This durability testing would have to be tested tons of times to be certain and no one has the funds to do that. Maybe we should have demolition ranch do us a wildly unscientific test.

These discussions are dumb. Literally saw a durability post the other month comparing skis with the exact same bases saying one is more prone to core shots -_-
It's coincidence until proven otherwise folks.

If you think they're so shitty, then don't buy them. Simple. Or stop buying beer, weed, and/or coffee for a few months, and pony up the cash for skis you deem durable.


Tldr: durability arguments are stupid and irrational.


I disagree, anecdotes are low quality data but more than nothing. Of course I agree the online durability discussions are way too overconfident, even sometimes irrational, but overall not completely useless.

I think the most realistic measure of ski durability would be to know the warranty rates and average lifespan of a ski model, even better if you control for skier ability and usage. Companies probably have at least information on warranty rates, but there's no way they'd publish that, and even then as mentioned it would be skewed by ability and usage (how many Blizzards or Salomons do you see in the park?)

The problem with controlled environment testing is that it needs to effectively simulate the real-world use case, which is not always easy or intuitive to do. You need to be 100% sure you are looking at what needs to be looked at, and modelling it realistically. There are many tales of caution in engineering like this, for example the steel used to build the titanic was tested for tensile strength, but its lack of ductility in cold temperatures (which was never tested back then) proved to be crucial in hindsight.

Also I definitely argue that durability comes from materials and construction, but also from the ski design itself. Poorly thought out tip designs are prone to delamination, designs with little thought to binding retention pull out bindings easier, die cut bases can separate and fold out with coreshots, etc.
3 years ago
8 0
profile picture
cyphers
Posts: 1867 - Karma: 21,477
Turd__AuthorityY'all sound like a bunch of butthurt fanboys


is that why you proceeded to write an essay about how much you want line's meat in your mouth?

their brand/content is great. unfortunately their products are quite ass. common knowledge at this point
3 years ago
9 0
profile picture
Christian_Bale
Posts: 2344 - Karma: 26,435
Turd__AuthorityTldr: durability arguments are stupid and irrational.

I agree that the perceived durability of a ski generally comes down to anecdotal evidence. But if I buy skis from a company and they snap/delam quickly, and then I keep hearing more bad things from other people in person and online, then I'm going to arrive at a certain conclusion. That's just the way it is. Having scientific data would be dope but I do put some trust in anecdotal evidence, because it's better than nothing. Considering k2 reckoners for instance: I don't know or understand much about their construction at all, but I've seen enough pairs get quickly destroyed in person that I would never buy them.
3 years ago
3 0
profile picture
Christian_Bale
Posts: 2344 - Karma: 26,435
I think I have mixed feelings about line. They have an incredible history, TAFT is one of the dopest events in skiing, and they still put out team videos. That being said, I do have durability concerns. Not a fan of a lot of the TW pro content that I come across, and some of their sponsorship choices are questionable to me.
3 years ago
5 0
profile picture
andreyer
Posts: 92 - Karma: 463
Turd__AuthorityStill cool enough to karma farm by shitting on Line. Y'all sound like a bunch of butthurt fanboys "wahh Eric pollard wahhhhhhh". This subject is getting to be as monotonous as "wHat sKi sHouLd i bUY?" It seems to be a great NS past time analogous to recommending ON3P for every ski gear question or saying "full tilt" every other post like a goddamn retard.

Line's durability can only be measured by the materials and construction of the skis themselves. Any anecdotal story of durability is the equivalent of a case report, which is the lowest reliable form of data. Every situation and every single aspect of that situation is different. Any ski can die in a day, and any ski can last years. It's purely situational. The only way to compare one ski to another is in a controlled environment with no other factors than the ski itself. Even then, each individual ski brand/model varies and even within each ski, there will be subtle differences. This durability testing would have to be tested tons of times to be certain and no one has the funds to do that. Maybe we should have demolition ranch do us a wildly unscientific test.

These discussions are dumb. Literally saw a durability post the other month comparing skis with the exact same bases saying one is more prone to core shots -_-
It's coincidence until proven otherwise folks.

If you think they're so shitty, then don't buy them. Simple. Or stop buying beer, weed, and/or coffee for a few months, and pony up the cash for skis you deem durable.


Tldr: durability arguments are stupid and irrational.


This is probably one of my least favorite replies. The ski durability is not even the biggest concern, line has been known to delam in the tip which is almost always the companies fault. If the glue is not strong enough to hold the materials together that's on the company. Also weather the company is dope or not is more related to their marketing, quality of product and riders on their team. Any company with money can write a pay check to a sick comp jock but if their products break quickly then that reflects bad on the company and cannot be overlooked.

Line has some sick ass riders and does put out content. The quality of content and and gear they are putting out should reflect on the company more than the amount of shit that they are putting out (quality over quantity). If they are handing out cheap ass park skis that delam and break super quickly are they really that sick? Also if they are just putting out mad reals and pushing this Instagram culture on skiing are they core?

Tucker dropped one of the hardest street parts this year mad probs, also peace lily was one of the dopest ski vids this year. Line supported these videos which makes them super cool but the other side of lineskis is their reel influencer shit baby ski culture. They are turning into a cariuma type of company which is kind of sad.

Line is a dope company with some cool riders. By no means could you consider them core anymore. They have pioneered freeskiing but are lowkee selling out. If you think cariuma is cool then you probably think what line is doing is cool.
3 years ago
4 3
profile picture
andreyer
Posts: 92 - Karma: 463
NewsheepersIf you still buy line is 2023 you're hopeless, and honestly who am I kidding your mom's paying for that shit ever since you saw jackson carstarter riding them on tiktok. But in that case you'll prolly never have an issue with them cuz you can't even slide a tube. So yes line is still cool to 10-12 year olds


Yo this is some gifted hater type shit, mad respect
3 years ago
7 0
profile picture
Trifes
Posts: 669 - Karma: 5,628
we got something coming up step step for durability of our skis. we've been working one some models that you will hear about soon. we always knew and we always worked on it. it just takes time to get the right things right :)

keep your eyes out for february & more
3 years ago
12 0
profile picture
HypeBeast
Posts: 10097 - Karma: 76,795
cyphersis that why you proceeded to write an essay about how much you want line's meat in your mouth?

Love their meat

Christian_BaleI agree that the perceived durability of a ski generally comes down to anecdotal evidence. But if I buy skis from a company and they snap/delam quickly, and then I keep hearing more bad things from other people in person and online, then I'm going to arrive at a certain conclusion. That's just the way it is. Having scientific data would be dope but I do put some trust in anecdotal evidence, because it's better than nothing. Considering k2 reckoners for instance: I don't know or understand much about their construction at all, but I've seen enough pairs get quickly destroyed in person that I would never buy them.

My point was that using anecdotal evidence to make conclusions is wrong. If it was right to make conclusions off case reports, we'd all be on ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine by now. Y'all do you. I'm just saying it's stupid and we all are entitled to our opinions no matter how unpopular or irrational.
3 years ago
2 0
profile picture
Christian_Bale
Posts: 2344 - Karma: 26,435
Turd__AuthorityLove their meat


My point was that using anecdotal evidence to make conclusions is wrong. If it was right to make conclusions off case reports, we'd all be on ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine by now. Y'all do you. I'm just saying it's stupid and we all are entitled to our opinions no matter how unpopular or irrational.

i agree it would be stupid to make conclusions based on anecdotal evidence in medical cases, but that's because there's actual scientific data to use instead. In the case of ski durability, we don't have that.
3 years ago
1 0
profile picture
TOAST.
Posts: 7801 - Karma: 40,441
I like the keep skiing weird side of line and as much as I like wallisch they should have paid traveling circus dudes more instead of picking him up. just isn't a good fit imo.
kinda still want to buy a pair of blends. might pick up a pair for cheap at end of season
3 years ago
2 1
profile picture
rusteezuschrist
Posts: 14 - Karma: 21
Does anyone know whether their warranty is legit? I have some blends and am curious whether if they delam I can get either a refund or new pair. They claim 2 year warranty for stuff like that. Lmk
3 years ago
1 0
profile picture
HypeBeast
Posts: 10097 - Karma: 76,795
Christian_Balei agree it would be stupid to make conclusions based on anecdotal evidence in medical cases, but that's because there's actual scientific data to use instead. In the case of ski durability, we don't have that.

You're reiterating my point but clearly not getting it. Oh well
3 years ago
1 0
profile picture
Christian_Bale
Posts: 2344 - Karma: 26,435
Turd__AuthorityYou're reiterating my point but clearly not getting it. Oh well

Nah I'm disagreeing with you. You're saying that using anecdotal evidence to make conclusions is wrong. I'm saying that, in this case, it's the best we have.
3 years ago
1 0
profile picture
isaacwrong
Posts: 2460 - Karma: 19,714
Popped up when i was browsing housing spots on facebook, couldn't refrain. Rip to all left skis




**This post was edited on Jan 21st 2023 at 7:29:16pm
3 years ago
4 0
profile picture
thankagaper
Posts: 911 - Karma: -1,569
line skis sucks
willwesson sucks
traveling circus sucks
wallisch sucks.
end of story.
Support Real Ski Companies,
Fatypus is handmade in america ,
nick lyons is indestructible, he cant destruct fatypus skis.
3 years ago
3 11
profile picture
BigPurpleSkiSuit
Posts: 9663 - Karma: 71,945
Blade optics ive heard great things about and they had Jonnie Merrill helping design those so you know he did a good job on them. Park lineup maybe not as good. I have never skied a pair of lines though.
3 years ago
1 0
profile picture
SteezyYeeter
Posts: 4122 - Karma: -14,053
not when they sign soyboys like andy parry. he 100% gets pegged.
3 years ago
1 14
profile picture
hi_vis360
Posts: 5399 - Karma: 56,090
I’m calling it now

if they get rid of “thin tip” technology, their skis will stop snapping. It’s that simple.

My first twin tips were the original chronics in 04. Tons of guys I grew up skiing with rode lines as well. I NEVER saw a pair of lines snap until they introduced “thin tip” technology. Then they seemed to snap all the time.

Honestly I think line has known this for a while. But if they made their skis thicker and more durable, they would be heavier, and for the past 10 or so years ski design has been light = good. I think that is finally ending, I hope. Cause line could make bomber skis if they wanted to, they have the ability, I just think they have lacked the will in recent years.
3 years ago
3 0
profile picture
rusteezuschrist
Posts: 14 - Karma: 21
I think it’s probably just a couple years of bad batches and shitty epoxy, I think we’ll see a comeback in a year or so if they drop their tiktok team
3 years ago
4 0
profile picture
supremeblientele
Posts: 991 - Karma: 5,738
hi_vis360I’m calling it now

if they get rid of “thin tip” technology, their skis will stop snapping. It’s that simple.

My first twin tips were the original chronics in 04. Tons of guys I grew up skiing with rode lines as well. I NEVER saw a pair of lines snap until they introduced “thin tip” technology. Then they seemed to snap all the time.

Honestly I think line has known this for a while. But if they made their skis thicker and more durable, they would be heavier, and for the past 10 or so years ski design has been light = good. I think that is finally ending, I hope. Cause line could make bomber skis if they wanted to, they have the ability, I just think they have lacked the will in recent years.


I snapped a pair of those all wooden after bangs back in the day, honestly that ski was bound to break looking back in hindsight. Also snapped a pair of 08 invaders
3 years ago
0 0
profile picture
hi_vis360
Posts: 5399 - Karma: 56,090
supremeblienteleI snapped a pair of those all wooden after bangs back in the day, honestly that ski was bound to break looking back in hindsight. Also snapped a pair of 08 invaders


Invaders for sure had durability issues, saw a few of those delam. My stepups also delammed but as you said those skate deck skis were bound to break.

line has always had some durability issues, but I’m talking about a specific, iconic type of snap, which has become very common. The tw pros above are a prefect example.
3 years ago
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4); Currently it's 2:50PM