Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

My bad but this would be a big help.

profile picture
Manskimac
Posts: 108 - Karma: 237
Made a few too many threads about this, just don’t wanna have a bad time with the wrong ski. I’m 5’5 120 looking at either nomad 95 in 176, wet+ In 177, or regular wet 177. I occasionally like to charge, trying to progress on jumps here and there but a rail skier to the core. Love nomad 95’s currently riding a 171, 171 feels a little small that’s why I’m thinking 176, just hate the price. then thinking wets or wet+ 177 because they are (similar to nomads but just with more rocker) could be wrong on that one. Lmk what you think I should get. Thank you!
Mar 20 2022 12:01AM
6 3
profile picture
mott
Posts: 251 - Karma: 1,989
ManskimacMade a few too many threads about this, just don’t wanna have a bad time with the wrong ski. I’m 5’5 120 looking at either nomad 95 in 176, wet+ In 177, or regular wet 177. I occasionally like to charge, trying to progress on jumps here and there but a rail skier to the core. Love nomad 95’s currently riding a 171, 171 feels a little small that’s why I’m thinking 176, just hate the price. then thinking wets or wet+ 177 because they are (similar to nomads but just with more rocker) could be wrong on that one. Lmk what you think I should get. Thank you!


wets are great skis and super fun but honestly too soft and narrow for jumps and bigger rails. wides or wet+ are def the move
Mar 20 2022 12:14AM
7 3
profile picture
a_pla5tic_bag
Posts: 9210 - Karma: 5,357
Too narrow? Back in the day, all park skis were narrow. Wider skis are just more to throw around and make switch ups slow. Huge skis also suck in shit snow conditions. OP I'm the same size as you and ski a 175 JJ, 171 Magnus, and 159 redster SL. With the rocker, the magnus do feel a bit small to me but it's not like I'd gain some advantage from going slightly longer. These are park skis too, they don't charge.
Mar 20 2022 10:21AM
7 0
profile picture
Manskimac
Posts: 108 - Karma: 237
a_pla5tic_bagToo narrow? Back in the day, all park skis were narrow. Wider skis are just more to throw around and make switch ups slow. Huge skis also suck in shit snow conditions. OP I'm the same size as you and ski a 175 JJ, 171 Magnus, and 159 redster SL. With the rocker, the magnus do feel a bit small to me but it's not like I'd gain some advantage from going slightly longer. These are park skis too, they don't charge.

No clue what you’re trying to say, but I prefer a longer ski. Doesn’t feel like extra to throw around, feels like extra speed.
Mar 20 2022 9:07PM
0 2
profile picture
BradFiAusNzCoCa
Posts: 6632 - Karma: 57,138
He’s replying to the guy above him. He’s right. They aren’t “too narrow” for jumps or “big rails”. That’s just wrong.
But maybe they’re a tad soft for jumps
ManskimacNo clue what you’re trying to say, but I prefer a longer ski. Doesn’t feel like extra to throw around, feels like extra speed.
Mar 21 2022 10:09AM
0 0
profile picture
Keeneo
Posts: 138 - Karma: 839
I had pluses and they were great with high speeds and all mountain
Mar 21 2022 10:31AM
0 0
profile picture
isaacwrong
Posts: 2213 - Karma: 16,945
Wides are coming in a 177 next year too..something that might be good to add to the mix
Mar 21 2022 11:44AM
2 0
profile picture
Manskimac
Posts: 108 - Karma: 237
isaacwrongWides are coming in a 177 next year too..something that might be good to add to the mix

Ya that made me hype might end up ripping those
Mar 21 2022 11:53AM
0 0
profile picture
rymeisterbaby
Posts: 122 - Karma: -575
Id get line blends not wet but good for everything
Mar 22 2022 11:45PM
0 1
profile picture
piss.boy
Posts: 1491 - Karma: 10,615
They definitely have not rocker then nomads. I'd say get a wet + especially if your progressing on jumps,unless there tiny jumps
Mar 24 2022 11:03PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)