Member of the Month

ReturnToMonkey
July, 2022

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

686 Pants

profile picture
yoit
Posts: 25 - Karma: 351
I’m looking to buy new pants and I saw the 686 3 in 1 pants on sale. If any of you have used them I would appreciate your opinion. Also are they a looser fitting pant?

**This thread was edited on Jul 24th 2021 at 10:57:00am
Jul 24 2021 10:56AM 4 0
profile picture
Session
Posts: 5099 - Karma: 18,769
They are kind of a classic snowboard fit in my opinion, definitely looser than my Trew bibs, but not as loose as say Saga. Bomber pant for sure.
Jul 24 2021 12:50PM 3 0
profile picture
yoit
Posts: 25 - Karma: 351
SessionThey are kind of a classic snowboard fit in my opinion, definitely looser than my Trew bibs, but not as loose as say Saga. Bomber pant for sure.


Aight thanks man rn I’m deciding between the 686 and the FW 2L pants
Jul 24 2021 3:03PM 0 0
profile picture
SavageBiff
Posts: 3267 - Karma: 13,518
My 686 bibs are prob my favs and most used, they are tear free after a years of trees and eating shit in questionable areas, sliding down ice faces at 60mph. They’re very comfy, not baggy but looser than a reg fit, not too long so they don’t get in way of pulling knees up like my planks bibs, also great warmth/cooling with 60g insulation, vents and good snow coverage, compatible with powder skirts, def recommended
Jul 24 2021 10:05PM 3 0
profile picture
yoit
Posts: 25 - Karma: 351
SavageBiffMy 686 bibs are prob my favs and most used, they are tear free after a years of trees and eating shit in questionable areas, sliding down ice faces at 60mph. They’re very comfy, not baggy but looser than a reg fit, not too long so they don’t get in way of pulling knees up like my planks bibs, also great warmth/cooling with 60g insulation, vents and good snow coverage, compatible with powder skirts, def recommended


On a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being skinny pants and 10 being average harlaut pant wearer what would you rate the bagginess?
Jul 24 2021 11:49PM 2 0
profile picture
SavageBiff
Posts: 3267 - Karma: 13,518
5
yoitOn a scale of 1 to 10 with 1 being skinny pants and 10 being average harlaut pant wearer what would you rate the bagginess?
Jul 25 2021 9:18AM 2 0
profile picture
oldmanski
Posts: 2365 - Karma: 13,378
I got a pair of 686 pants and really dig them! I agree with @SavageBiff on the bagginess, right in the middle. Im not a tight pant wearer nor do I like the super baggy fit. I like them just baggy enough to go over my knee braces and allow me a full range of motion. They are super durable and I highly recommend, especially if you can get them for a deal like I did for $60 new at the Portland ski expo.
Jul 26 2021 7:44AM 1 0
profile picture
SavageBiff
Posts: 3267 - Karma: 13,518
Damn that’s a steal not a deal, I got mine for idk $130-$180 usd and I was happy, blew all more more expensive spider pants etc out the water, will be wearing them this seaz too
oldmanskiI got a pair of 686 pants and really dig them! I agree with @SavageBiff on the bagginess, right in the middle. Im not a tight pant wearer nor do I like the super baggy fit. I like them just baggy enough to go over my knee braces and allow me a full range of motion. They are super durable and I highly recommend, especially if you can get them for a deal like I did for $60 new at the Portland ski expo.
Jul 26 2021 9:14AM 1 0
All times are Eastern (-4)