Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
gorbdawggybrentwet plus maybe
WoFlowzReckoner 102 possibky
Piss_BoyYeah but the playfullness really isnt comparable to wets or blends
WoFlowzI figured with them being apart of a freeride family and a fairly softish flex theyd be a good option cause they can still be skied somewhere other than the park
Piss_Boytrue. Homestly though reckoners arent that sofft
gorbdawggybrentfrom what i hear they are “soft as fuck”
WoFlowzReckoner 102 possibky
weastcoastWe need a nogoggs pro model
Piss_BoyThey are not.
Suitcase_My reckoner 102 showed up at my door step earlier in the week and they are definitely a softer ski when hand flexing them
pinkcamo1000I've owned blends and wets, wets are definitely better skis overall. But as people have said, if you're coming from a freeride background wides or wet+ would probably be more fun for you.
Wets are great for doing little jibs all around the mountain, but def aren't the best skis for boosting floaty 3s off of natural features, you'll want a more stable ski for that. If you can afford them, ON3Ps are def better suited for skiing on variable snow and charging around the mountain, Magnus 102s or Jefferys might be the call if you're used to skiing aggressively.
Skiblade420I’ve had 185 blends and am looking at possibly getting 189 wets.
Which would you say had more stability on jump landings?
My blends were okish but was looking for something a touch more solid on landings.
I’m 6’2 so I want 189s, so I’m kind of turned off by the weight the 189 wides will probably be, and the wet plus graphics aren’t really my thing. So it leaves me wondering if the wets will be enough...
Skier_man05Get wets. the New blends are ugly as fuck
Skiblade420Yeah dude wtf is up with those bright colors. Graphic is so try hard too