Limiting people to having 2 children per couple?

McNocheI'm on board. I hate kids.

DirtYStylEhahahaha mr. alias is back at it kids watch out. I wonder how many accounts belong to this 4chan wannabee

McNocheWhat are you talking about you dumb mother fucker? I have had 1 account. Member since 2012. Learn your facts before spewing shit, dumb cunt.

DirtYStylEYou got trolled. Go back the sewage waste plant you crawled out of. HA THAT WAS SO FUCNNY OMG

McNocheMake America great again #trump

DirtYStylEI am going to quote you agin, you will downvote me, then post a reply that hardly relates to what I said. Ready... GO!

McNocheTake a hike cunt

doubleui am a huge advocate of blowjobs. they are healthy, delicious, and tasty.

DingoSeanThread too long. Will read when less busy.



In meantime, my $0.02



Sterilize everyone. Humans are dumb.





Edit: Read the thread. Again. Humans are dumb.

Also, people need to learn not to get into internet fights with skiierman. It's just not really worth it. He's even immune to banhammers. It's impressive.

I mean. The way he comes back from the dead. It's like Voldemort found a lake of unicorn blood...

**This post was edited on Jun 3rd 2018 at 4:09:29am

mulchbrainIts very easy to blame developing country's for over population while we complain about the latest skis and what winter was like. Its a very complicated issue . There is a lot of different reasons why it makes sense to have more or less children depending on the stage in development in a country. The only proven way to change population is for a country to become richer / developed. Also as stated near the start of this thread , its about the average not about one couple having 8 kids. Its a super complicated problem , but blaming underdeveloped country's is the last thing and easiest thing to do .

DirtYStylEDownvote me I don't give a fuck. I am just being real unlike these stupid fucking keyboard warriors who think they are hot shit for being mean to kids

theLiquorWere not blaming African countries, we get that. India (and mormons, to appease our UT baged posters). Shame!


I digress, but I’m disappointed ghat I was the only one to downvote this.
I had to train a guy who was annoying AF but very smart and spent a couple years teaching in China. Why isn’t there more tension between China and India? Here China has 1 child policies and then the Indians next door having tons of kids. Anyways co-worker was just talking about an Indian family with 5 children visiting China and how insanely disrespectful that is to do there

**This post was edited on Jul 13th 2018 at 4:44:13pm

**This post was edited on Jul 13th 2018 at 4:45:13pm

SnickleFriz"I think human consciousness, is a tragic misstep in evolution. We became too self-aware, nature created an aspect of nature separate from itself, we are creatures that should not exist by natural law. We are things that labor under the illusion of having a self; an accretion of sensory, experience and feeling, programmed with total assurance that we are each somebody, when in fact everybody is nobody. Maybe the honorable thing for our species to do is deny our programming, stop reproducing, walk hand in hand into extinction, one last midnight - brothers and sisters opting out of a raw deal."

theabortionatorPeople complained a lot about China's one child policy, but was it really that bad? We have 7.6 billion people on this earth and people are still cranking out 5+ kids. Then those kids are cranking out more kids.

We're like rabbits. Just fucking and popping out more and more.

Personally I'd be very okay with a 2 or 3 child limit going forward. I get that on the one hand, some people are able to support a big family and give them a great life. I get that, and can see it as an argument. The downside is there will still be more kids than needed going forward who will get older and start their own families.

At a certain point we need to start thinking about controlling this shit. It's already pretty out of hand, but seems to be something to unpopular to discuss. Do people really need to have 7 kids? I get that in the old days there were less people, and birth control wasn't really a thing. It's 2018 though. Absolute worst case you can get free condoms.


Like Bob Barker always said, "Help control the human population. Take the pill, get a vasectomy, get your tubes tied, check out your local abortion clinic, or wear a fucking condom".

mulchbrainWhats the idea behind overpopulation being a problem at this time anyway?

jeremyo13i don't think you should be able to have any kids at all until you pass some kind of competence test. Also, we now protect and coddle idiots. So now retards that should have died due to natural selection are now living and breeding, passing on their idiot genes.
And if you're on welfare, no kids for you.

theabortionatorStop having so many fucking kids. When the world population goes over 10 bil we're fucked. We need to knock these numbers down not go up. When you have 10 kids, those stupid fucks are growing up and each having more kids.

People who have 10+ kids should be punched in the face not get a reality show. Nature is chill, fuck you and all your kids.

IsitWinterYet17We could hit 10bil as soon as 2040 at the fastest projections. The world population is growing exponentially and eventually will hit a level where a mass die off event/period happens from food likely or even worse from whatever global warming causes. Some people think it's around 10bil or some think more. Likely it will impact third world countries and high population countries like China the hardest. India for sure. I'd like to think the US would fare better than those places because of our farmable land:population ratio but we will probably be fucked too. We can only prevent it for so long. It happens everywhere in nature; humans are just more delayed in our cycles cuz we can partially control it.

Interesting quote from Wikipedia "It took over 200,000 years of human history for the world's population to reach 1 billion; and only 200 years more to reach 7 billion."

Exponential growth .....


China did have a decent but radical idea of population restriction with the one child law. Technically over time that would reduce populations, but we humans like to procreate so....

**This post was edited on Nov 19th 2018 at 2:23:52am

IsitWinterYet17We could hit 10bil as soon as 2040 at the fastest projections. The world population is growing exponentially and eventually will hit a level where a mass die off event/period happens from food likely or even worse from whatever global warming causes. Some people think it's around 10bil or some think more. Likely it will impact third world countries and high population countries like China the hardest. India for sure. I'd like to think the US would fare better than those places because of our farmable land:population ratio but we will probably be fucked too. We can only prevent it for so long. It happens everywhere in nature; humans are just more delayed in our cycles cuz we can partially control it.

Interesting quote from Wikipedia "It took over 200,000 years of human history for the world's population to reach 1 billion; and only 200 years more to reach 7 billion."

Exponential growth .....


China did have a decent but radical idea of population restriction with the one child law. Technically over time that would reduce populations, but we humans like to procreate so....

**This post was edited on Nov 19th 2018 at 2:23:52am

Profahoben_212Is the problem that most people with tons of kids are usually wackos and the normal people stick at one or 2? some idiocracy shiz

SnickleFriz"I think human consciousness, is a tragic misstep in evolution. We became too self-aware, nature created an aspect of nature separate from itself, we are creatures that should not exist by natural law. We are things that labor under the illusion of having a self; an accretion of sensory, experience and feeling, programmed with total assurance that we are each somebody, when in fact everybody is nobody. Maybe the honorable thing for our species to do is deny our programming, stop reproducing, walk hand in hand into extinction, one last midnight - brothers and sisters opting out of a raw deal."

theabortionatorPeople complained a lot about China's one child policy, but was it really that bad? We have 7.6 billion people on this earth and people are still cranking out 5+ kids. Then those kids are cranking out more kids.

We're like rabbits. Just fucking and popping out more and more.

Personally I'd be very okay with a 2 or 3 child limit going forward. I get that on the one hand, some people are able to support a big family and give them a great life. I get that, and can see it as an argument. The downside is there will still be more kids than needed going forward who will get older and start their own families.

At a certain point we need to start thinking about controlling this shit. It's already pretty out of hand, but seems to be something to unpopular to discuss. Do people really need to have 7 kids? I get that in the old days there were less people, and birth control wasn't really a thing. It's 2018 though. Absolute worst case you can get free condoms.


Like Bob Barker always said, "Help control the human population. Take the pill, get a vasectomy, get your tubes tied, check out your local abortion clinic, or wear a fucking condom".

theLiquorI hate people who want like4-5 kids. It’s one thing when you’re a farmer in a rural area.. my wife’s asian-Indian friend wants 4-5. Like wtf...
Full agreement. I think what gets people is say they want a boy, after two girls do you roll the dice and go for the third? But some people just want tons of kids. It’s really impressive whenyou look at the amount of people with 0 kids yet they’re still outbalanced
Our world is f’d either way

theabortionatorYeah I feel you. And def. The wanting a boy or girl is a reason some people keep sending it. Idk why people wont adopt. Also pretty sweet that christians generally have bigger families, are strongly against abortion, hate gay people and fighting gay adoption, and very rarely ever adopt.

I spent years in churches and don't really remember anybody that adopted kids. Obviously some do, but its not an ultra common deal.

They protest abortion (I was at the huge "march for life" in DC with my parents a few times and dozens of other protests) but then they don't adopt kids, they pop out more kids, and want to ban perfectly normal couples that aren't having kids from adopting.

If somebody is against abortion but has adopted a kid, at least they seem steady with their beliefs. There is no shortage of kids that need permanent homes and people need to realize that their genes probably aren't all that special.

BenWhiti'm not sure i follow either of you as to what the problem is with having 4+ children, at face value.

i come from a family of 4 boys... i'm the oldest (26) and the youngest is 18. my family had the means to raise 4 well-educated, productive children. that's not to be braggadocios, it's stating a fact that we are all or will be college graduates, above average earners, and largely healthy people. the incremental cost to society of us being alive vs. say, a family of four obese, low-IQ, chronically ill people is incredibly low.

population is a multifaceted problem, but i would personally say that a major part of that problem are unfit parents producing more than their fare share of children. my SO works in a low-income school district as an LMHC and a large percentage of this kids she spends most of her time with are products of low income, low education, abusive, drug-addicted, poor mental health parents. what's more, some of them are one of 6+ children from the same mother and more than one father. it sounds fucked up, but there parents are creating children with a low probability of being healthy, productive members of society. therein lies the problem.

VinnieFJust going to point out that, on average, the US, Canada, and pretty much all other developed countries have fertility rates of less than 2 births per woman. Canada is 1.6, US is 1.8. So we are already below your target number. The world is at 2.4, with a rate of 2.1 needed to maintain the population.

VinnieFJust going to point out that, on average, the US, Canada, and pretty much all other developed countries have fertility rates of less than 2 births per woman. Canada is 1.6, US is 1.8. So we are already below your target number. The world is at 2.4, with a rate of 2.1 needed to maintain the population.

VinnieFJust going to point out that, on average, the US, Canada, and pretty much all other developed countries have fertility rates of less than 2 births per woman. Canada is 1.6, US is 1.8. So we are already below your target number. The world is at 2.4, with a rate of 2.1 needed to maintain the population.

notadoctorStop being ridiculous. The problem isn't that there's too many people it's that there's people at all.
The hopeful alternative to the extinction of millions of species of plants and animals is the voluntary extinction of one species: Homo sapiens... us.
http://www.vhemt.org

icedI ain’t saying this is morally right but if you snipd all Indians we would probably have a world population of 4billion next week