Member of the Month

Jems
November, 2021

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Help with Candide 2.0 ski length

profile picture
Hough
Posts: 8 - Karma: 95
So i'm 5'9 140lb and i've been riding Faction 1.0 176s for the past 3 years mostly park indoors. Off to Japan for a season next year and want to get something a little wider for all mountain ripping. I ski very aggressively on the mountain and can't make my mind up between the 178 or 184 version of the Candide 2.0. Anyone got any advice? I'll have them centre mounted again so I don't think the 184 will feel too much longer. Currently leaning towards the 184s..

edit: I've got some 185 pow skis for the deep days so the Candides will be my everyday ski

**This thread was edited on Jan 11th 2018 at 10:20:41am
POLL
Edit Poll
Votes:

Take care when editing a poll; Options should be similar to maintain vote integrity.

More options will be added automatically as you type. You must supply a question and at least two options. No HTML is allowed.

Jan 11 2018 10:06AM 1 1
profile picture
jjams
Posts: 75 - Karma: 325
I'm 5'7'' 150lb and I ski the 178. The dimensions and light weight make the skis feel short, in a good way. I'd consider going for the 184. Also, they are crazy fun, enjoy!
Jan 11 2018 10:31PM 1 0
profile picture
Bondy
Posts: 277 - Karma: 442
buddy if your heading to Japan get CT 3.0s in a 184
Jan 16 2018 1:49PM 3 0
profile picture
SofaKingSick
Posts: 6768 - Karma: 34,260
either one will be just fine so don't worry about it. but id say 184 since it's for all mtn ripping and youre centering them
Jan 16 2018 2:07PM 1 0
profile picture
Grindy_McSlider
Posts: 480 - Karma: 1,261
Japan, I would take the CT 3.0 lol
Jan 16 2018 3:08PM 4 0
profile picture
Cade2
Posts: 2116 - Karma: 2,649
3.0? Get the 4.0 haha
Jan 16 2018 9:43PM 3 0
profile picture
Hough
Posts: 8 - Karma: 95
Thanks for all your help guys, like I said in the post above i've got some 120 waist full rocker Majesty Lumberjacks for the deep days, but this will be my daily ski for everything else
Jan 17 2018 8:44AM 0 0
profile picture
Bondy
Posts: 277 - Karma: 442
HoughThanks for all your help guys, like I said in the post above i've got some 120 waist full rocker Majesty Lumberjacks for the deep days, but this will be my daily ski for everything else


Still man maybe you would even like the ON3P Kartel 108 like the candide but better float and FAR more stable. I had the CT2.0s and hated them for all mountain like a floppy noodle with only a decent amount of playfullness
Jan 17 2018 12:25PM 0 4
profile picture
BushwhackerNZ
Posts: 14 - Karma: 32
HoughThanks for all your help guys, like I said in the post above i've got some 120 waist full rocker Majesty Lumberjacks for the deep days, but this will be my daily ski for everything else


To be fair man I think you’ll appreciate the 3.0’s more as a daily driver over there. Depending on where you’re going, park isn’t really gunna be that much of a thing either.

Groomers get destroyed pretty quick over there too either from more snow falling or little crews of boarders hiding around blind corners and rolllers waiting for you to take them all out ..I think that extra width in the 3.0 would be appreciated, especially with the kind of skiing you’ll most likely end up doing and the snow conditions there.

In all honesty, depending what you wanna do over there and how you ski etc, you’ll probably get away with the lumberjacks as your daily.
Jan 20 2018 9:34PM 0 0
profile picture
Mj2936
Posts: 62 - Karma: 58
JakeBondyStill man maybe you would even like the ON3P Kartel 108 like the candide but better float and FAR more stable. I had the CT2.0s and hated them for all mountain like a floppy noodle with only a decent amount of playfullness


How would you compare kartel 108 vs CT 3.0?
Jan 20 2018 11:40PM 0 0
profile picture
Bondy
Posts: 277 - Karma: 442
Mj2936How would you compare kartel 108 vs CT 3.0?


You can ACTUALLY ride the whole mountain on Kartels you really cant on the CT 2.0s. Where the cts will have an advantage is buttering thats it
Jan 20 2018 11:45PM 0 4
profile picture
Mj2936
Posts: 62 - Karma: 58
JakeBondyYou can ACTUALLY ride the whole mountain on Kartels you really cant on the CT 2.0s. Where the cts will have an advantage is buttering thats it


Did you mean 3.0's? I understand they are a different beast compared to the 2.0s
Jan 21 2018 10:05AM 0 0
profile picture
jjams
Posts: 75 - Karma: 325
JakeBondyYou can ACTUALLY ride the whole mountain on Kartels you really cant on the CT 2.0s. Where the cts will have an advantage is buttering thats it


Have you actually skied the 2.0s or are you just talking shit? I skied them all over Alta today and had a blast.... didn't even go to the park.
Jan 21 2018 8:32PM 1 0
profile picture
Bondy
Posts: 277 - Karma: 442
jjamsHave you actually skied the 2.0s or are you just talking shit? I skied them all over Alta today and had a blast.... didn't even go to the park.

Owned a pair for 60 plus days thank you very much. I didnt like them, i ski whistler which has a lot of snow, japan is going to have even more.
There floopy noodles
Jan 21 2018 10:39PM 0 0
profile picture
Cade2
Posts: 2116 - Karma: 2,649
JakeBondyOwned a pair for 60 plus days thank you very much. I didnt like them, i ski whistler which has a lot of snow, japan is going to have even more.
There floopy noodles


I think JakeBondage just sucks at skiing
Jan 22 2018 12:51AM 0 0
profile picture
Bondy
Posts: 277 - Karma: 442
CadeRI think JakeBondage just sucks at skiing


Buddy just cause your dad didn’t come back from the cigarette store doesn’t mean you can go around and be a fucking retard
Jan 22 2018 1:35AM 4 0
profile picture
Cade2
Posts: 2116 - Karma: 2,649
JakeBondyBuddy just cause your dad didn’t come back from the cigarette store doesn’t mean you can go around and be a fucking retard


Hahaha nice
Jan 22 2018 2:13AM 3 0
profile picture
CanDong_Thovex
Posts: 1 - Karma: 13
Sheeeesh, that escalated quickly
Jan 26 2018 2:10PM 0 0
All times are Eastern (-5)