Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Biological equality

profile picture
WidelyHomier
Posts: 49 - Karma: 108
I'm in no way trying to be edgy or anything like that, I'm just curious of what you guys think. Do you think the reason women are bad at things like soccer, skating and whatnot is because they are discouraged from doing such things, and the really talented ones don't use their potential, or do you think they are physically inferior.

I just wanna know opinions.
Nov 3 2015 2:09AM
80 34
profile picture
onenerdykid
Posts: 6638 - Karma: 10,532
californiagrownHahahahaha so you do agree with the statement "men are physically superior to women". You just don't agree with the statement " all men are physically superior to all women". Funny thing is, no one said the latter, but your own mind sure did twist the first onto the latter. Have fun arguing the wording instead of the VERY obvious intent.


So in your mind, the sentence "men are physically superior to women" is logically equivalent to the sentence "men can be physically superior to women"? I can see why you don't do well with actual logic. These sentences are not the same yet the thing is some people do argue this point, and I was making sure OP wasn't. But, nice try.
Nov 6 2015 1:34PM
1 0
profile picture
deleted5
Posts: 14507 - Karma: 13,500
onenerdykidSo in your mind, the sentence "men are physically superior to women" is logically equivalent to the sentence "men can be physically superior to women"? I can see why you don't do well with actual logic. These sentences are not the same yet the thing is some people do argue this point, and I was making sure OP wasn't. But, nice try.

I think you're taking what op said too literally, he was clearly just implying women are worse at playing soccer than men, not bad at actually playing it.
Nov 6 2015 1:40PM
0 0
profile picture
californiagrown
Posts: 9794 - Karma: 2,014
onenerdykidSo in your mind, the sentence "men are physically superior to women" is logically equivalent to the sentence "men can be physically superior to women"? I can see why you don't do well with actual logic. These sentences are not the same yet the thing is some people do argue this point, and I was making sure OP wasn't. But, nice try.


Never said anything of the sort. You just have terrible reading comprehension... Or are always looking to debate semantics and wording instead of ideas.
Nov 6 2015 1:43PM
0 0
profile picture
onenerdykid
Posts: 6638 - Karma: 10,532
californiagrownNever said anything of the sort. You just have terrible reading comprehension... Or are always looking to debate semantics and wording instead of ideas.


The starting point of any discussion is a clear definition, and if we can't be clear about it then mistakes will be made. Why should I assume what he meant?

If you re-read my post to you, it was phrased in the form of question. And if you say yes to the question, then I was calling you out. It seems like you are the one with terrible reading comprehension.
Nov 6 2015 2:04PM
0 0
profile picture
californiagrown
Posts: 9794 - Karma: 2,014
onenerdykidThe starting point of any discussion is a clear definition, and if we can't be clear about it then mistakes will be made. Why should I assume what he meant?

If you re-read my post to you, it was phrased in the form of question. And if you say yes to the question, then I was calling you out. It seems like you are the one with terrible reading comprehension.


Go back and read your first post. Then sit down, shut up, and think about what you've done.

Now, do you think women are physically inferior, superior or equal to men? It's a simple question, with a very clear ideological intent, and allows for a wide berth of qualifiers in your answer. Can you bring yourself to actually address the question instead of the wording?
Nov 6 2015 2:33PM
0 0
profile picture
onenerdykid
Posts: 6638 - Karma: 10,532
californiagrownNow, do you think women are physically inferior, superior or equal to men? It's a simple question, with a very clear ideological intent, and allows for a wide berth of qualifiers in your answer. Can you bring yourself to actually address the question instead of the wording?


Wow your reading comprehension is deplorable, and now I just know you're trolling because I've already agreed with the OP that in a general sense men are physically stronger than women before you came into the debate. I agree with him in the first sentence of my second post in this thread. You just don't understand it I guess.
Nov 6 2015 2:51PM
0 0
profile picture
californiagrown
Posts: 9794 - Karma: 2,014
onenerdykidWow your reading comprehension is deplorable, and now I just know you're trolling because I've already agreed with the OP that in a general sense men are physically stronger than women before you came into the debate. I agree with him in the first sentence of my second post in this thread. You just don't understand it I guess.


Everything said has gone straight over your head... Or your trolling. And doing a terrible job of it. First rule of trolling: you should never put in more effort than the person you're trying to troll. Come on man!
Nov 6 2015 3:19PM
0 0
profile picture
The-Rodent
Posts: 1222 - Karma: 325
KazabazuaExcept for the Williams sisters who pretty much are men.


Cant disagree there
Nov 6 2015 4:35PM
0 0
profile picture
act.resist
Posts: 8875 - Karma: 513
nocturnalOur brains are different

http://www.m.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/features/how-male-female-brains-differ


OH MY GOD. do you ever shut the fuck up?
Nov 7 2015 12:06PM
0 5
profile picture
250r
Posts: 2274 - Karma: 1,020
how about race? even more of a taboo question really, but i find it very interesting.

can the average black man jump higher and run faster than the average white man?

are more asians talented in math than whites?

are inuits better adapted to the cold?

im all for equality, but realistically, we all have some differences.
Nov 7 2015 3:11PM
0 0
profile picture
onenerdykid
Posts: 6638 - Karma: 10,532
250rim all for equality, but realistically, we all have some differences.


Generally, when people speak about equality, it's in reference to moral equality which is not the same thing as physical equality, the things you listed.
Nov 7 2015 3:31PM
0 0
profile picture
deleted5
Posts: 14507 - Karma: 13,500
butterslut.OH MY GOD. do you ever shut the fuck up?

Do you ever say anything that's correct?
Nov 7 2015 3:43PM
0 0
profile picture
californiagrown
Posts: 9794 - Karma: 2,014
250rhow about race? even more of a taboo question really, but i find it very interesting.

can the average black man jump higher and run faster than the average white man?

are more asians talented in math than whites?

are inuits better adapted to the cold?

im all for equality, but realistically, we all have some differences.

Ill bite.

1) the average african american has a greater potential vert and top speed largely because Slaves in the americas were picked based upon their strength and athletic look. additionally it took some strong fucking humans to survive the abhorrent conditions to reproduce.

2) no. i think its nurture more than nature.

3) yes. better adapted to utilize a high fat, high meat diet. blood vessels and circulatory differences also allow for lower heart rate and circulation to extremeties.
Nov 7 2015 4:38PM
0 0
profile picture
Download-My-Apps
Posts: 5069 - Karma: 1,017
250rhow about race? even more of a taboo question really, but i find it very interesting.

can the average black man jump higher and run faster than the average white man?

are more asians talented in math than whites?

are inuits better adapted to the cold?

im all for equality, but realistically, we all have some differences.


californiagrownIll bite.

1) the average african american has a greater potential vert and top speed largely because Slaves in the americas were picked based upon their strength and athletic look. additionally it took some strong fucking humans to survive the abhorrent conditions to reproduce.

2) no. i think its nurture more than nature.

3) yes. better adapted to utilize a high fat, high meat diet. blood vessels and circulatory differences also allow for lower heart rate and circulation to extremeties.


Those are some pretty loaded questions, and I actually agree with Californiagrown. Your examples there are more specific populations adapting to the environment (not race). As for your example of Asians and academics, I would think that is more a cultural thing.
Nov 7 2015 5:15PM
0 0
profile picture
supersquid
Posts: 1430 - Karma: 2,545
Women are free to du what they want. They should never be discriminated against for doing stuff that is not typical. But people can not turn their heads away from the fact that men are typically physically stronger than women. does not mean they can not be stronger than some or even most men but they are not biologically designed to be strong. in prehistoric time they stayed at home and watched the kids while the men went out hunting thats just how it was. maybe in 10,000 years they will adapt and men and women will get closer biologically as brute strength is no longer needed in todays society but as of right now they are biologically inferior when it comes to pure muscle mass.
Nov 7 2015 8:42PM
0 0
profile picture
act.resist
Posts: 8875 - Karma: 513
nocturnalDo you ever say anything that's correct?


lets agree to disagree on this subject and the other subject
Nov 8 2015 12:08AM
0 0
profile picture
deleted5
Posts: 14507 - Karma: 13,500
butterslut.lets agree to disagree on this subject and the other subject


Lets agree that I'm right because im backed by science, and you don't know what you're talking about.
Nov 8 2015 10:54AM
1 2
profile picture
californiagrown
Posts: 9794 - Karma: 2,014
On the otherhand it could be argued that women are physically superior because a woman's body is NECESSARY for reproduction. A man's is not, only his sperm is.
Nov 8 2015 12:10PM
0 0
profile picture
deleted5
Posts: 14507 - Karma: 13,500
californiagrownA man's is not, only his sperm is.


And where does that sperm come from that gave you half of your dna again? O that's right, Dez nuts!
Nov 8 2015 2:00PM
2 1
profile picture
remove
Posts: 2566 - Karma: 1,026
"I don't care, I just want to hear opinions."

that just makes you an asshole. take a side or don't bring it up
Nov 8 2015 2:25PM
0 0
profile picture
californiagrown
Posts: 9794 - Karma: 2,014
nocturnalAnd where does that sperm come from that gave you half of your dna again? O that's right, Dez nuts!


Yeah, but after the sperm, the man's body is never needed again for reproduction. A woman's body supplies the egg AND the vessel to grow a human.


Plus, the needed apendages to feed said little human for a good long time.
Nov 8 2015 4:12PM
0 0
profile picture
deleted5
Posts: 14507 - Karma: 13,500
californiagrownYeah, but after the sperm, the man's body is never needed again for reproduction. A woman's body supplies the egg AND the vessel to grow a human.


Plus, the needed apendages to feed said little human for a good long time.


Yeah, but we can dunk so I'd say it's even.
Nov 8 2015 4:16PM
0 0
profile picture
act.resist
Posts: 8875 - Karma: 513
nocturnalLets agree that I'm right because im backed by science, and you don't know what you're talking about.


no lets just agree to disagree thanks! :D
Nov 8 2015 5:45PM
0 0
profile picture
deleted5
Posts: 14507 - Karma: 13,500
butterslut.no lets just agree to disagree thanks! :D


I do not agree that we should agree to disagree.
Nov 8 2015 7:12PM
0 0
profile picture
skier58284
Posts: 1705 - Karma: 5,365
Women are not objectively physically inferior to men, but they are objectively physically different than men, which makes them inferior in some specific areas such as athletics.
Nov 9 2015 4:12AM
0 0
profile picture
act.resist
Posts: 8875 - Karma: 513
nocturnalI do not agree that we should agree to disagree.


good ol' zzzskizzz
Nov 9 2015 10:20AM
0 0
profile picture
californiagrown
Posts: 9794 - Karma: 2,014
Cats.Women are not objectively physically inferior to men, but they are objectively physically different than men, which makes them inferior in some specific areas such as athletics.


In what ways are they superior or equal, physically?
Nov 9 2015 10:30AM
0 0
profile picture
AgitatedHiatus
Posts: 319 - Karma: 1,053
californiagrownIn what ways are they superior or equal, physically?


I think he's trying to say that they aren't inferior, rather they are just different.
Nov 9 2015 10:52AM
0 0
profile picture
californiagrown
Posts: 9794 - Karma: 2,014
AgitatedHiatusI think he's trying to say that they aren't inferior, rather they are just different.


Being athletically worse by nearly all measurable standards isn't athletically inferior?

They are different. No kidding. I have named a way in which they are physically superior and a way tgey are inferior. I ask you, in what ways are they physically superior to males?
Nov 9 2015 12:12PM
0 1
profile picture
Charlie_Kelly
Posts: 11953 - Karma: 12,292
californiagrownYeah, but after the sperm, the man's body is never needed again for reproduction. A woman's body supplies the egg AND the vessel to grow a human.


Plus, the needed apendages to feed said little human for a good long time.


Men can produce breast milk tho....
Nov 9 2015 1:05PM
0 0
profile picture
las.
Posts: 1959 - Karma: 1,455
californiagrownOr are always looking to debate semantics and wording instead of ideas.


Oh god, the irony
Nov 9 2015 8:45PM
0 0
profile picture
skier58284
Posts: 1705 - Karma: 5,365
californiagrownBeing athletically worse by nearly all measurable standards isn't athletically inferior?

They are different. No kidding. I have named a way in which they are physically superior and a way tgey are inferior. I ask you, in what ways are they physically superior to males?


I didn't say that women are not athletically inferior. I said that women are not physically inferior. Athletically, men are generally superior. I meant "physically" in a broader sense than specifically athletically.
Nov 10 2015 12:51PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)