A quick word on blocking ads
It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
geibI just got the 168. I have not rode them yet but they are kinda heavy i noticed. Thats the only down side. They are super flex and have the perfect amount of rocker in my opinion. They will probably be very buttery and fun though so I'm stoked to ride them
freeski1620I love this ski. I have 6 skis and this is my go to. It's great everywhere.
Just make sure you put an orange binding on it.
#OBC
geibGet em, the swing weight is low from what i heard but the overall weight is kinda heavy but not that bad
yeahmonwhat is the brake size for them
geibI will probably get 100 to 110 brake width. And i will mount them probably at -1 or center because i pretty much mainly do park.
AftergurnerI wouldnt do center because they aren't a symmetrical ski. The tip has more rocker than the tail too. I have been contemplating where remount mine, either -1 or -2. They have a line at -2 but I am intrigued on how far forward they can be mounted forward with no substantial performance tradeoffs. I have 100mm brakes and they're fine.
geibOh ya your right thanks. Ill probably do -1 then. maybe -2 but i really want the most balance i can get.
AftergurnerI used 100mm brakes. They work pretty well as they are 97 underfoot I believe. What are you using for bindings?
yeahmoni have fks now and they r on armada ar7s would/could i just get new brakes?
