Member of the Month

Dlonetti
August, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Atomic Punx vs. Volkl Walls vs. Fischer Nightsticks

profile picture
Micah-W
Posts: 83 - Karma: 76
I am 6 foot tall and 135 lbs. I ski mainly park I live on the west coast so sometimes I need them to handle a bit of powder. I do 80 percent jumps and 20 percent rails. Which skis should I get and what size?
Sep 30 2014 7:56PM
16 3
profile picture
Micah-W
Posts: 83 - Karma: 76
bump
Sep 30 2014 9:07PM
0 0
profile picture
.FRY.
Posts: 5620 - Karma: 22,860
get the fishers...the brett fishers



for real though. I'd recommend the walls. I skied on them all last season. They're awesome.
Sep 30 2014 10:49PM
7 0
profile picture
Micah-W
Posts: 83 - Karma: 76
.FryI'd recommend the walls. I skied on them all last season. They're awesome.


What size and is stiffness an issue since im light?
Sep 30 2014 11:22PM
0 0
profile picture
Micah-W
Posts: 83 - Karma: 76
Bump
Oct 1 2014 10:34AM
0 0
profile picture
Micah-W
Posts: 83 - Karma: 76
All advice/opinions help, Thanks.
Oct 1 2014 1:12PM
0 0
profile picture
G_Wink
Posts: 67 - Karma: 76
All three skis are great choices! but here are a few things to keep in mind.

Punx have a slight tip and tail rocker and are a bit stiffer underfoot due to the new sidewall construction, which is great for jumps and all around skiing.

Walls are a full camber ski that is also made for jumps

Nightstick is also a full camber ski but you say being light is a issue, it has carbon fiber underfoot making it extremely stiff especially when it is cold out.


Making the choice of wanting rocker or not is what it will come down to

Punx or Wall is my opinion for you, can't go wrong with either

Lastly on size i would say the 182 Punx or 185 Wall just because you mostly do jumps and will eventually gain weight, they will be a bit stiff at first but you will quickly get used to it if you are a experienced park rider.
Oct 1 2014 3:03PM
1 1
profile picture
Micah-W
Posts: 83 - Karma: 76
G_WinkAll three skis are great choices! but here are a few things to keep in mind.

Punx have a slight tip and tail rocker and are a bit stiffer underfoot due to the new sidewall construction, which is great for jumps and all around skiing.

Walls are a full camber ski that is also made for jumps

Nightstick is also a full camber ski but you say being light is a issue, it has carbon fiber underfoot making it extremely stiff especially when it is cold out.


Making the choice of wanting rocker or not is what it will come down to

Punx or Wall is my opinion for you, can't go wrong with either

Lastly on size i would say the 182 Punx or 185 Wall just because you mostly do jumps and will eventually gain weight, they will be a bit stiff at first but you will quickly get used to it if you are a experienced park rider.

Thanks for the advice.
Oct 1 2014 3:32PM
0 0
profile picture
Micah-W
Posts: 83 - Karma: 76
Buying skis today bump.
Oct 2 2014 9:42PM
0 0
profile picture
Park.
Posts: 2480 - Karma: 4,582
Fischers have carbon fibers throughout the ski, not just underfoot (just a correction) but for durability, Walls or Nighsticks, I have personally seen punx blow massive amounts of edge in only a few months (east coast ftw) but Walls usuallly last over 1 season over here and every pair of nightsticks i have seen look to be in almost perfect condition and the owners said they were amazing skis.

IMO i would go nightsticks, thats what I almost got this season and thats what I think would be your best bet
Oct 2 2014 9:50PM
0 0
profile picture
Park.
Posts: 2480 - Karma: 4,582
Fischers have carbon fibers throughout the ski, not just underfoot (just a correction) but for durability, Walls or Nighsticks, I have personally seen punx blow massive amounts of edge in only a few months (east coast ftw) but Walls usuallly last over 1 season over here and every pair of nightsticks i have seen look to be in almost perfect condition and the owners said they were amazing skis.

IMO i would go nightsticks, thats what I almost got this season and thats what I think would be your best bet
Oct 2 2014 9:50PM
0 0
profile picture
Micah-W
Posts: 83 - Karma: 76
Are the walls light? How does the swing weight of those skis compare?
Oct 2 2014 10:04PM
0 0
profile picture
Micah-W
Posts: 83 - Karma: 76
Bump, one more opinion before I buy them
Oct 2 2014 11:11PM
0 0
profile picture
SwedishSteezeJDH
Posts: 60 - Karma: 314
Gus Kenworthy vs Nick Goepper vs Joss Christiansen (coincidence?)
Oct 2 2014 11:28PM
2 0
profile picture
Micah-W
Posts: 83 - Karma: 76
SwedishSteezeJDHGus Kenworthy vs Nick Goepper vs Joss Christiansen (coincidence?)


Haha they all ride symmetrical skis that are fairly stiff
Oct 2 2014 11:30PM
0 0
profile picture
Micah-W
Posts: 83 - Karma: 76
bump
Oct 3 2014 5:39PM
0 0
profile picture
.FRY.
Posts: 5620 - Karma: 22,860
Micah-Wbump


stahp
Oct 3 2014 6:05PM
2 0
profile picture
lurking
Posts: 2221 - Karma: 6,786
You asked about the podium, so go with the "gold" standard
Oct 4 2014 12:14AM
0 0
profile picture
last_tango
Posts: 2635 - Karma: 2,665
The nightsticks are the og fischer addicts and out east as a liftie i saw a ton of addicts that were still in use. They are the heaviest out of the skis you are looking at. They are the stiffest underfoot with a sheet of titonal underfoot. If you don't go with the nightstick and you are still wanting to have them/try them out the value of them will drop with fischer not having a lot of product movement.
Oct 4 2014 10:55AM
0 0
profile picture
icydope
Posts: 450 - Karma: -2
SwedishSteezeJDHGus Kenworthy vs Nick Goepper vs Joss Christiansen (coincidence?)

: D
Dec 30 2014 1:51PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)