Why are the virtually 0 girls who do engineering or hard sciences?

SpssWhere are you dirac? Furiously search for an article to read that will prove me wrong and vindicate you, saving your precious fucking ego?

You wont find it.
Keep trying tho

SpssHey utard you know what another name for bohmian mechanics is?
THE CAUSAL INTERPRETATION

Why dont you go lecture the geniuses who deal with it on how they must change the name, according to you haha.
Youre a state school cocksucking loser.
If you were proud of your uni, youd tell us what it was.
But youre not going to. You didnt get into where you dreamed of going because those schools dont accept fucking average losers.
Stop pretending youre something which youre not, fuckboi.
Nobody here buys your genius facade.
Youre not special, utard. Your parents lied to you.

ArabianI go to a state school. Many state schools have fantastic departments in many different areas of study. The University of Utah features one of the leading researchers in Dark Matter, as well as a top 20 ranked mathematics department in Algebraic Geometry, Algebraic number theory, and Geometric Topology. People like John Baez (whom I'm sure you know of) head schools like UCR, and someone like George McNulty heads CS/Maths at UNC, and the University of Wisconsin (yet another state school) has historically had a top 10 mathematics department for the going on 50 years.

State schools are not to be looked down upon. A quality education can occur in any location where there's a good library and enough help to keep you motivated if you get stuck. It's the sign of someone who is terribly insecure about their ranking within their class who falls back upon the name of their school.

SpssYoure a state school cocksucking loser.

SpssStop pretending youre something which youre not, fuckboi.

SpssNobody here buys your genius facade.

Diracthat probably makes no sense. but I like writing equations on NS

\[H\Ket{\Psi}=E\Ket{\Psi}\]

Arabiantake the mutually adjoint operators taking the semidirect

ArabianI've never taken a quantum physics class, but I do know from my vague cursory studies that the creation and annihilation operators take the mutually adjoint operators taking the semidirect product of finitely many hilbert spaces into the complex numbers and from the complex numbers to back again respectively. I've been reading lately also that QF theorists (specifically w.r.t. gravity) have been using topoi to represent operators and entanglements. Do you know of any introductory notes/books on the subject, or is it strictly research at this point? Maybe spss can point me in the right direction, since he can spell "causal" :^)

SpssAnd dirac, i read your article, and i find the toy setups a crock of shit.

Diracreally? because it unequivocally proves you are wrong. assuming you take the definition of "casual" that the authors (and most physicists) do.

they make no claims about anything physical. they just show that determinism and casualty are independent of each other.

SpssIm guessing he means topology

Arabian*She.

also, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topos

Diracyou are a girl?

Diracyou are a girl?

ArabianYou must be joking.

Diracno?

ArabianYes, i am lady.

ArabianYes, i am lady.

chickenHey Arabian

chickeni don't get it?

WillgumRight on!
My mom works in a field dominated by men. When there's a problem, the differences in the way women think vs. men think means that you get to approach the problem from different angles. More angles= more probability of finding a solution.