Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight

profile picture
theater.thug
Posts: 441 - Karma: 671
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBREA2701720140308?irpc=932

Ground loses contact with flight from Kuala Lampur to Beijing. Says they would have run out of fuel by now. Pretty crazy stuff.
Mar 7 2014 9:11PM
930 245
profile picture
Barefootin_Fiend
Posts: 7618 - Karma: 4,727
facebook isn't the issue. it sounds like it's an instant messenger service that might autoconnect as long as the phone remains on.
Mar 12 2014 12:52PM
0 0
profile picture
fujarome
Posts: 8630 - Karma: 1,561
But once again, think of how long your phones battery lasts. Even if you barely touch it, most phones would be long dead by this point.

It's definitely an interesting point, but I think people are putting way too much emphasis on it.
Mar 12 2014 12:57PM
2 0
profile picture
ManicMaverick
Posts: 68 - Karma: 66
threads for updates
Mar 12 2014 1:07PM
0 0
profile picture
itzbrett
Posts: 108 - Karma: 43
The mean depth of the gulf of Thailand is 40m, and the western part is only 15m This case is rated to 100 ft.

http://www.otterbox.com/Pursuits/40/77-22859,default,pd.html?KPID=77-22859&gclid=CMz73v6_jb0CFcURMwodD2wAfA



Mar 12 2014 1:23PM
0 1
profile picture
RJ_Res
Posts: 628 - Karma: 292
100ft = roughly 30 meters, so on average the depth is greater than what that case is rated for. Also, that's not exactly a phone case, it's more of a relatively large protective carrying case for an assortment of valuables. It isn't exactly meant for carrying your phone around in on the daily and I doubt anyone on the plane had their phone in something like that.
Mar 12 2014 1:42PM
0 0
profile picture
itzbrett
Posts: 108 - Karma: 43
^^^ I agree with all of that. Still cannot rule it out as an explanation though.
Mar 12 2014 1:45PM
0 0
profile picture
Ribss.
Posts: 3442 - Karma: 3,344
ELT's don't transmit underwater, the antenna would need to be above the surface. I think they float but it would need to be dislodged from the craft and in all honesty if they hit the water nose first its probably destroyed. The blox box pingers would be the only option at this point.
Mar 12 2014 2:19PM
1 0
profile picture
Barefootin_Fiend
Posts: 7618 - Karma: 4,727
i agree. though i do remember reading something along the lines that the phone was showing active on that service up through mid day monday when it finally disconnected. which would roughly fit about the right timeline for a phone with no use...i don't know if any of them are STILL showing connected.

and who knows, there may be a perfectly reasonable explanation for it, but all things considered, it adds to the WTF of the whole situation. this whole thing is a huge WTF.
Mar 12 2014 2:58PM
1 0
profile picture
Bombogenesis
Posts: 1984 - Karma: 4,006
Some oil rig worker said he saw it burning in the air?
Mar 12 2014 3:00PM
0 0
profile picture
JStrathern
Posts: 8747 - Karma: 1,536
Click for larger image
Mar 12 2014 3:26PM
19 0
profile picture
Barefootin_Fiend
Posts: 7618 - Karma: 4,727
that's fucked up.
Mar 12 2014 3:38PM
2 8
profile picture
El_Barto.
Posts: 11630 - Karma: 24,465
link for mobile?
Mar 12 2014 3:56PM
0 0
profile picture
Ribss.
Posts: 3442 - Karma: 3,344
They didn't even put the right airplane, what a fucking piece of shit.
Mar 12 2014 4:18PM
1 2
profile picture
Barefootin_Fiend
Posts: 7618 - Karma: 4,727
http://i.imgur.com/M2tL4kY.png
Mar 12 2014 4:19PM
0 0
profile picture
t_rob
Posts: 6433 - Karma: 11,458
Putting the plane for sale on the internet could be funny but for 100k on craiglist with a stock pic just isn't witty and therefore not even worth this disproving post.

2001 Boeing 777-200's go for 50 mil legit....
Mar 12 2014 4:23PM
1 0
profile picture
Gherbs
Posts: 530 - Karma: 903
source?
Mar 12 2014 4:32PM
0 0
profile picture
DIX~
Posts: 4695 - Karma: 6,502
Okay, I laughed
Mar 12 2014 4:33PM
6 0
profile picture
Bombogenesis
Posts: 1984 - Karma: 4,006
http://www.boston.com/news/source/2014/03/report_oil_rig_worker_tells_employer_he_saw_malaysia_airline.html



Google it there are many articles. I haven't really been paying attention so it might be old news.
Mar 12 2014 4:45PM
0 0
profile picture
jensen
Posts: 2575 - Karma: 1,250
http://newyork.craigslist.org/mnh/for/4370884298.html
Mar 12 2014 4:50PM
0 0
profile picture
MACAQUE
Posts: 2811 - Karma: 696
Wait so are there any military bases immediately along the possible path after turned around? I'm not sure how far away the military's radar was from the flight when they said the picked up a signal.
Mar 12 2014 4:56PM
0 0
profile picture
whoa-dere
Posts: 10596 - Karma: 7,100
It includes all the snacks?! Sold
Mar 12 2014 4:58PM
3 0
profile picture
MACAQUE
Posts: 2811 - Karma: 696
---Unidentified aircraft approaches military airspace
--Military orders aircraft to turn around or get shot down
--Aircraft's communications system went down so it can't hear the message
--Military shoots down jet
--Realizes it was a passenger jet
--Coverup
Mar 12 2014 5:17PM
16 1
profile picture
AT-AT
Posts: 3281 - Karma: 3,256
lolz. threads for updates.
Mar 12 2014 5:17PM
0 0
profile picture
fujarome
Posts: 8630 - Karma: 1,561
I'd say ridiculous, but the fact that this has happened multiple times means it's a pretty credible theory
Mar 12 2014 5:22PM
3 0
profile picture
Rafiki
Posts: 3858 - Karma: 2,251
i'm offended that you'd accuse me in such a way.

watch your back because we're already watching it
Mar 12 2014 6:07PM
14 0
profile picture
fujarome
Posts: 8630 - Karma: 1,561
Chinese released a satellite photo showing something quite large floating. Really hope it's the plane just to get some answers
Mar 12 2014 7:14PM
1 1
profile picture
Barefootin_Fiend
Posts: 7618 - Karma: 4,727
sounds like the pieces are rather squarish....definitely now what i would expect plane wreckage dimensions to be...

13*18 meters
14*19 meters
24*22 meters


the wingspan of a 777 is 61 meters and it's length is 64 meters. i just don't understand how those dimensions could result in debris that size....

but then again, im certainly not a specialist.

on the other hand, i can't imagine the chinese going public with these kind of details without being fairly certain of their findings....unless there's a cover up of some sort going on...
Mar 12 2014 7:36PM
0 0
profile picture
Barefootin_Fiend
Posts: 7618 - Karma: 4,727
i suppose the fuselage could peel open, but even if it did, that stuff wouldn't float? i'm having a really hard time seeing how this could possibly be wreckage...
Mar 12 2014 8:02PM
0 0
profile picture
Blake.P
Posts: 9894 - Karma: 3,585
with the fuselage, if the impact were hard enough, i would it would imagine it could break apart. say it broke into a 20m long section then was essentially unrolled, the circumference of teh fuselage could easily be 30m around
Mar 12 2014 8:03PM
0 0
profile picture
gotti
Posts: 4269 - Karma: 4,548
Its pretty fucking obvious to me that there is a cover up going on. YOU DONT JUST LOSE A FUCKING 777. My bet is the cia or malaysian equivalent knows exactly what happened by this point and there is a reason the world doesnt know
Mar 12 2014 9:28PM
3 0
profile picture
Barefootin_Fiend
Posts: 7618 - Karma: 4,727
that's what i was saying in the post just above yours. that unrolled section still wouldn't float though....
Mar 12 2014 9:30PM
0 0
profile picture
fujarome
Posts: 8630 - Karma: 1,561
it could definitely float. maybe not for very long, but it could. The tail from AF447 floated for a few days until they found it.
Mar 12 2014 9:37PM
1 0
profile picture
DERS.
Posts: 6299 - Karma: 1,293
the vertical stabilizer on an a330 is made of composite materials and thus was found floating. the same part on a 777 is made of metal and would not float. very unlikely any large components are still floating.

and its hard to compare these two crashes without knowing much about what happened. still the tail piece was found 5 days later w/ af447 and the main hull was not found until ~2 years later. point being, could be a very long time before anyone knows what the hell happened here.
Mar 12 2014 9:54PM
1 0
profile picture
Blake.P
Posts: 9894 - Karma: 3,585
meh i only saw your first post. i might have been typing when you posted again...


regardless, i guess thats true that it wouldnt be floating. at least very very unlikely
Mar 12 2014 11:27PM
0 0
profile picture
cornholio
Posts: 3952 - Karma: 3,057
Click for larger image
Mar 12 2014 11:43PM
2 0
profile picture
7springsprod
Posts: 2661 - Karma: 3,181
Made entirely of metal. Floats.
Click for larger image
Mar 13 2014 12:57AM
1 1
profile picture
7springsprod
Posts: 2661 - Karma: 3,181
Click for larger image
Mar 13 2014 12:59AM
1 1
profile picture
7springsprod
Posts: 2661 - Karma: 3,181
Click for larger image
Mar 13 2014 12:59AM
0 1
profile picture
7springsprod
Posts: 2661 - Karma: 3,181
Click for larger image
Mar 13 2014 12:59AM
0 1
profile picture
El_Barto.
Posts: 11630 - Karma: 24,465
^nice posts noob
Mar 13 2014 1:01AM
0 0
profile picture
Rafiki
Posts: 3858 - Karma: 2,251
learn about water displacement and ballasts. planes don't have ballasts, and a wrecked plane wouldn't displace water in such a way that it would float
Mar 13 2014 1:04AM
1 1
profile picture
7springsprod
Posts: 2661 - Karma: 3,181
Click for larger image
Mar 13 2014 1:07AM
1 1
profile picture
7springsprod
Posts: 2661 - Karma: 3,181
Click for larger image
Mar 13 2014 1:07AM
0 1
profile picture
.Duncan.
Posts: 1375 - Karma: 459
except its sinking....
Mar 13 2014 1:09AM
2 1
profile picture
Wallisch_pl
Posts: 5260 - Karma: 1,022
Keyword "wrecked" plane, anyways, they sink eventually
Mar 13 2014 1:13AM
2 1
profile picture
Scaredwhiteboy
Posts: 1395 - Karma: -946
CNN is now reporting that data the engines sent back suggests the plane was flying for four hours after it lost contact with the ground. Could somebody have actually stolen a plane?
Mar 13 2014 4:59AM
1 0
profile picture
corona
Posts: 12752 - Karma: 32,266
CNN is full of shit. Both Boeing and Rolls Royce say that no such thing has happened.
Mar 13 2014 7:27AM
0 0
profile picture
Bombogenesis
Posts: 1984 - Karma: 4,006
The malaysian government also denies it.
Mar 13 2014 7:46AM
0 0
profile picture
Sharknuts.
Posts: 339 - Karma: 953
I WANNNA KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO THE FUCKING PLANE!!!
Mar 13 2014 10:56AM
1 0
profile picture
Barefootin_Fiend
Posts: 7618 - Karma: 4,727
CNN is just repeating info from WSJ. According to the Malaysian gov't, Boeing and Rolls Royce deny it, but a spokeman for Rolls Royce declined to comment on the matter citing "an official air accident investigation".

who the fuck knows. there's so much fucking speculation going on right now. i have a hard time believing that a plane that size flew for four more hours without being spotted ANYWHERE. Then again, i also have a hard time understanding how a plane that size can just drop off of the face of the earth without a single trace of evidence.
Mar 13 2014 11:41AM
2 0
All times are Eastern (-4)