Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Question for the tall skiers
Posts: 133
-
Karma: 513
Recently I've been looking for more of a baggy fit in my ski pants. I'm 6'2 so to all the tall skiers out their that rock look, what size pants should i get?
Posts: 228
-
Karma: 69
Posts: 1054
-
Karma: 641
XL pants work great for me. I'm 6'2 - 6'3
Posts: 133
-
Karma: 513
would the orage belmont pant be a good buy?
Posts: 75
-
Karma: 265
My buddy has them, they look really nice but they're not very baggy.
Posts: 502
-
Karma: 1,972
Armada harlaut/local in XL is baggy AF. Jacket is the real struggle when youre 6'2"
Posts: 44
-
Karma: 40
Saga L-XL pants, depending on bag/sag level. And Bloom outwear XXL jacket for me. Works great
Posts: 444
-
Karma: 1,642
Virtkia v3 pants, xl/xxl. Fat as shitt
Posts: 133
-
Karma: 513
Does anyone else have experience with the belmont pant?
Posts: 2091
-
Karma: 3,754
6'3... Xl armada and saga work fine
Posts: 40
-
Karma: 357
I'm 6'2 too and I like my pants really baggy. Saga XXL pants are baggy enough, although I'd probably get XXXL if I could (they don't make them that big, do they?)
Posts: 2211
-
Karma: 2,394
I'm ~6'4 and I have the Belmont in L. They're good for spring days or if I'm going for a hesh look that day. My other pair that I wear regularly are the under amour desert camo pants from this year in the biggest size, those fuckers are baggy. The baggiest pair I have though are the pants that T-wall actually wore in the super unknown edit. They're called burton ronins and are huge even on me.
Posts: 133
-
Karma: 513
what about the lethal descent standard issue pant? does that sag well?
Posts: 3053
-
Karma: 1,975
Agreed 100%. I love mine.
All times are Eastern (-4)
