Member of the Month

vibecheck
August, 2020

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Marker Jester Pro

profile picture
Just_Send_It
Posts: 4707 - Karma: 457
Searchbar-ed..

Worth the steep price and flashy colors?

http://www.evo.com/alpine-ski-bindings/marker-jester-pro.aspx

Is the toe bombproof?
Light weight?
any difference between the 2012, 2013, and 2014 models other than color?

thanks, k+ for solid answers...

Sep 23 2013 6:41PM 13 4
profile picture
Lemuel
Posts: 13971 - Karma: 6,067
They redesigned the whole line for 2013. After having the previous generation Jesters, I would probably veer towards the new design. My Jesters got real sketchy, so much play in the heel pieces both on the track and at the pivot point. The new design seems slightly beefier.
Sep 23 2013 11:12PM 1 0
profile picture
Just_Send_It
Posts: 4707 - Karma: 457
thanks anyone else have somthing to add?
Sep 24 2013 4:26PM 0 0
profile picture
Pipe_Munky
Posts: 10808 - Karma: 1,586
they will take a shit kicking before letting you down. just remember that the AFD doesn't move like on the regular Jester and Griffon. other than that, they're pretty much just a Jester with a tougher spring
Sep 24 2013 5:06PM 1 0
profile picture
rozboon
Posts: 1642 - Karma: 827
For the money, I would get FKS/Pivots or STH16 before Jester Pros... but that's just me.
Sep 25 2013 3:09AM 1 0
profile picture
LC.
Posts: 5952 - Karma: 2,401
If I was going to pay full retail for any bindings on the market, it would be Jester Pros.
Sep 25 2013 3:59AM 0 0
profile picture
k2andcannoli
Posts: 644 - Karma: -38
They redesigned it because they had to cover their asses. If I were you id get some fks, same design heel for 20+ years. If Iit aint broke dont fix it.
Sep 25 2013 9:13AM 0 3
profile picture
Pipe_Munky
Posts: 10808 - Karma: 1,586
actually there has really been no significant change to the core Griffon/Jester design since it first came out. the "new" design was strictly for aesthetics.

you've got a massive hate on for marker eh?
Sep 25 2013 9:39AM 0 0
profile picture
K-Dot.
Posts: 3492 - Karma: 5,824
What about the fact that the fks has a super narrow mounting position. That seems like it should be "fixed"
Sep 25 2013 9:46AM 0 0
profile picture
-SnowSnoli-
Posts: 756 - Karma: 1,703
STH 16s> Jesters.
Sep 25 2013 10:13AM 2 0
profile picture
tomPietrowski
Posts: 6494 - Karma: 12,497
that and the fact there is no easy way to change brakes
Sep 25 2013 10:27AM 1 0
profile picture
k2andcannoli
Posts: 644 - Karma: -38
No I dont hate marker. I used to love the mrr they made, still have a mint pair on my gaper sticks. Moreover, I guess im a fan of high elasticity. To me thats what keeps me skiing. I ride at 9ish on the fks; markers and sollies I just cant stay Iin them at such a low din.
I just laugh that every year shit hss to be new and better, just so ppl will keep wanting new shit.

I like that Rossi didn't even bother with a new paint job this year. Give me a 18 or 15 and ill have that binding forever.
Sep 25 2013 1:15PM 0 0
profile picture
k2andcannoli
Posts: 644 - Karma: -38
Its a binding not for children, wait till ur feet stop growing.
Sep 25 2013 1:16PM 0 0
profile picture
k2andcannoli
Posts: 644 - Karma: -38
Ok...this is a bitch.
Sep 25 2013 1:18PM 3 0
profile picture
MartianMan
Posts: 1101 - Karma: 2,093
FKS 180 > Jester Pro
Safer, no pre-release.
Sep 25 2013 3:32PM 0 1
profile picture
Evangelista
Posts: 481 - Karma: 1,554
Get them. They are the best binding on the market in my opinion.
Sep 25 2013 9:44PM 1 0
profile picture
Plankton
Posts: 3206 - Karma: 6,552
this is extremely false but yeah they're not a bad binding at all
Sep 25 2013 10:44PM 0 0
profile picture
rsvp
Posts: 1509 - Karma: 2,485
I've had the 2012 model on my pow skis for one season now and they've been solid as a rock, super beefy and no heel slop whatsoever (yet).
Sep 25 2013 10:53PM 0 0
profile picture
rsvp
Posts: 1509 - Karma: 2,485
I've had the 2012 model on my pow skis for one season now and they've been solid as a rock, super beefy and no heel slop whatsoever (yet).
Sep 25 2013 10:53PM 1 0
profile picture
K-Dot.
Posts: 3492 - Karma: 5,824
Wat. I'm just saying that as skis have widened, so have bindings so that you can have more control over the ski. It would make sense if they were to make a wider version of the fks
Sep 26 2013 4:10AM 0 0
profile picture
Ghini
Posts: 2029 - Karma: 1,601
Well thats not the best news since the white jester from a few years back had a lot of issues with the toe piece.. (getting a lot of play in it)
Sep 26 2013 6:46AM 0 0
profile picture
Pipe_Munky
Posts: 10808 - Karma: 1,586
what do you consider as a lot? i sold a ton of those bindings and never saw one come back with an issue. granted i sold most of them with new boot setups so they didn't get sloppy if your boot was still within acceptable DIN compliance. they did add the height adjustable afd for those with super worn boots.
Sep 26 2013 9:18AM 0 0
profile picture
MartianMan
Posts: 1101 - Karma: 2,093
FKS bindings seem skinny, but they have an extra wide AFD, and have great power transmission on wider skis.
Sep 26 2013 8:36PM 0 0
profile picture
k2andcannoli
Posts: 644 - Karma: -38
Im no physicist but if a wide (110+) ski is designed for soft snow then why would you require additional force into the ski vs. A narrow (70-90) ski which is skied on hard snow.

Ultimately the on piste ski has greater forces exerted into it from the skier through the binding.
Sep 26 2013 9:11PM 0 0
profile picture
Goku
Posts: 8119 - Karma: 4,220
Jester Pro's are fucking bomb proof
I have had 2 pairs and I absolutely love them
They're not terribly heavy and they hold up great.
The metal in the toe piece is great, along with the non moving afd.
Only non A/T binding I would ever buy
Sep 27 2013 12:14PM 1 0
All times are Eastern (-4)