Obama to cut health benefits for Military

#ThanksObama

You're pretty ridiculous if you believe that we've ever had a politician that has told nothing but the truth... or better yet, try finding one human that fits your criteria.

Well, its certainly not this man..

Hate to burst your bubble, but it really doesn't matter what this one guy said. Saddam actually used Sarin, Mustard and VX gas on his own people. In order to use them, you kind of have to possess them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_chemical_attack

This was as verifiable as the chemical weapons recently used in Syria.

What was way more important was the testimony of Hussein Kamel, Sadam's son in law.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/unscom/experts/defectors.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hussein_Kamel_al-Majid

He was running Saddam's weapons program, defected, was told it was safe to return home. He went home and Uday and Qusay Hussein killed him. He gave valuable intelligence on how Saddam was moving his weapons program. That was fact. He may not have had nukes, but he did have the nastiest chemical weapons available. Where the hell they went to is anyone's guess, but he did have them because he did use them.

I wish some of you would try reading some of the history on this instead of taking these videos as gospel.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Fox News is less biased than this

so much is wrong with this post, come on man really mustard gas?

Weapons of mass destruction." No term has been more abused, or less understood. George Bush has made it his personal mantra, and the slogan of his presidency.

An administration that may have concocted fake evidence to launch war on Iraq may yet conveniently "discover" unconventional weapons there -- before November's U.S. elections. So let's define what such weapons are -- and are not.

Three types of unconventional arms are called WMD: nuclear, chemical and biological.

Of those, the only true weapons of mass destruction are nuclear. The U.S., Russia, China, France, Britain, Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea, alone possess them. Japan could make nuclear weapons within 90 days.

Without specialized medium and long-range delivery systems (aircraft or missiles), nuclear weapons are useless, even suicidal.

Last week, Bush warned of nuclear proliferation and called for a worldwide ban on the trade of nuclear material. This when U.S. ally Pakistan has been exposed as a major proliferator, Israel is covertly helping build India's nuclear capabilities and the U.S. plans to deploy a new generation of nuclear weapons designed to attack Third World targets.

Chemical weapons, which are not WMD, are blistering, choking, or toxic agents. Mustard gas possessed by Iraq, Libya, Syria, Egypt and other nations is World War I technology. Horrible as they are, these are strictly battlefield weapons, requiring large, clumsy holding tanks, and depend on favourable winds. Winston Churchill authorized using poison gas against "primitive tribesmen" -- Kurds in Iraq and Afghans -- when he was British home secretary. Benito Mussolini's Italy used mustard gas in Ethiopia and Libya.

Choking gas, like chlorine, is also a tactical battlefield agent. French troops without gas masks defending a 4-km front at Verdun in 1916 were hit by 60,000 chlorine gas shells, yet held their lines. So did Canadian troops in Flanders, also without masks, who heroically fought off superior German forces.

"reading some of the history" Quoting wikipedi nice. finally what does Syria have to do with anything? last time I checked we are not going to war with them. bush said there were wmds going to be used on the u.s.a. He lied some mustard gas being used on his own people is not WMD's.

"Three types of unconventional arms are called WMD: nuclear, chemical and biological."

Just ignore him, he's a fucking idiot.

Dude, this is an embarrassingly idiotic post. The entire thing is aimed at downgrading the effects of chemical weapons, yet you blatantly contradict yourself. The fact that you presented it with 4th grade writing skills does not help your case.

Please put down the crack pipe.

Not sure why I am wasting my time here, but I am just trying to figure out your argument. You list chemical weapons as WMD's which is how the U.S. government and NATO categorizing them too. Later you say they are not WMDs, or that they don't matter because they are not capable of killing enough people. Are you serious? VX gas, rendered aerosol, over a large city could kill millions. From the CDC(a fairly credible source):

http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ershdb/EmergencyResponseCard_29750005.html

You didn't like my source regarding Saddam's use of chemical weapons; is the BBC News OK with you?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/march/16/newsid_4304000/4304853.stm

"According to experts, the chemicals dropped by the planes may have included mustard gas, the nerve agents sarin, tabun and VX and possibly cyanide."

It is a fact that Saddam had these chemical weapons, it is a fact that he used them. There is no record that he ever destroyed them. They were never found. A small aircraft with a relatively primitive delivery system could disperse VX over a highly populated area, and no one would have any idea until their skin started to melt off. One drop is lethal.

There is a reason that even the most liberal politicians are scared about the possibility of a terrorist attack on the US using chemical weapons. There is a reason that this exists:

http://www.un.org/disarmament/WMD/Chemical/

I think you have to admit that you have no fucking idea what you're talking about.

I said people are riding the bandwagon, there's a difference.

Regardless, it doesn't matter how fucking long people have been doing it, it's still a sad waste of time when people seemingly only want to complain about someone doing a job that NOBODY can do in a way that will please everyone.

He improved their health benefits by not starting two pointless wars. Don't give me syria, no troops on the ground.

seems pretty fucked up seeing that the military is what makes the United States what it is. We have the best military in the world who risks their lives fighting for us and he decreases their health benefits.....seems stupid to me

He's not trying to start a war in Syria either... He promised no boots on the ground

No, he ends them.

This man has some actual knowledge. Thank you.

Lol this is true sometimes when i take a look on this thing it sounds a bit weird and like a lot of people i have the same opinion this isn't working somehow you have posted the correct thing.

Obama will go down as one of the worst presidents in us history. Even democrats are starting to jump ship on his presidency lol

George washington never told a lie, would your fourth grade history book lie to you?

Liberalism truly is a mental disease

Potato