Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Need Fast Help!!! CHRONIC vs ANTIGEN
Posts: 17360
-
Karma: 28,438
I've skid on LTES and Phil Larose pros the past 4 years and just broke my skis this past weekend. I know they are both light and both have tip and tail rocker. Mostly wondering how they compare in flex as i've never held a pair of 2013 Chronics before. If you can compare their flex to the LTEs that would be even better and much appreciated!
Oh and also I know LINE skis used to run long for their size. Is this still true?
Posts: 17360
-
Karma: 28,438
Forgot, I want to throw Recoils into the mix as well
Posts: 17360
-
Karma: 28,438
c'mon people trying to make a decision tonight/tomorrow
Posts: 1436
-
Karma: 250
I'd say it's really a tossup between what you personally want. Don't know much about the Anitgen, but the Recoil and Chronics are both decent all-mountain skis, but slay the park, and can hold up on small-medium jumps, and both are very, very durable. The Chronics have early rise, the Recoils have jib-rocker. The Recoil is 90mm underfoot, the Chronic 93mm underfoot. Both have essentially the same dimensions, 121/90-93/115-117. I personally would say the Recoil, the rocker is nice, even with the Chronic having early rise. I also think the Chronic will be a bit stiffer. Just my opinion.
Posts: 17360
-
Karma: 28,438
Well the recoils have all terrain rocker not jib rocker but ya it's basically a toss up.
Mostly wanna know if the chronics are really stiff and if someone can compare their stiffness to another ski.
All times are Eastern (-4)
