• Forums
  • Media And Arts
  • The Most Popular Cameras and Settings for Reuters’ 2012 Photos of the Year

Member of the Month

JalmarKalmar
April, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

The Most Popular Cameras and Settings for Reuters’ 2012 Photos of the Year

profile picture
1337
Posts: 31039 - Karma: 29,013
Looks like they love Canon!

http://www.petapixel.com/2012/12/02/the-most-popular-cameras-and-settings-for-reuters-best-photos-of-the-year-2012/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+PetaPixel+%28PetaPixel%29
(Images can be embedded but the 86 just finished downloading and I'm off to watch it)

Dec 5 2012 1:23AM
1 0
profile picture
TijmenDal
Posts: 4849 - Karma: 1,295
Good to see my beloved 5D classic 6th on that list! Who would've thought!
Dec 5 2012 3:10AM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61157 - Karma: 118,846
Most popular lenses -- 16-35 and 70-200

Most popular fstop -- 2.8

28% of the time on the top two lenses used, they shot wide open....


-______________________________________-
Dec 5 2012 3:22AM
0 0
profile picture
CrotchKiller
Posts: 9037 - Karma: 6,940
DOF doe
Dec 5 2012 3:30AM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31039 - Karma: 29,013
wanna know how I know you've never been in a journalist's position before?
Dec 5 2012 3:35AM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61157 - Karma: 118,846
wanna know how i don't care? lol


but for real, their most popular setup/settings is 1dm4, iso 200, shutter 320 and f2.8
Dec 5 2012 3:38AM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31039 - Karma: 29,013
do you really think someone in their right mind would shoot f2.8 1/320th iso200? no of course not, it's just the combinations of popular combinations
Dec 5 2012 3:41AM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61157 - Karma: 118,846
lol i mean, maybe?
Dec 5 2012 3:59AM
0 0
profile picture
andrew.ski
Posts: 368 - Karma: 69
Not a fair list at all (even though I love that my setup is way up there on the list)

Reuters is a canon only company, and therefore canon should have taken 100% of the pictures had the photographers maybe not used their own Rigs once in a while

If AFP did a test it would probably show up all Nikon.
Dec 5 2012 4:16AM
0 0
profile picture
Mag
Posts: 8155 - Karma: 14,809
Those pie charts are so shit, makes it much harder to read.
Dec 5 2012 5:28AM
0 0
profile picture
tombu
Posts: 138 - Karma: 69
Lololo pic #60
"Canon EOS 5D Mark II, lens 16-35mm, f1.4, ISO 250 "
Nice lens bro.
Dec 5 2012 9:40AM
0 0
profile picture
SSteezle
Posts: 9221 - Karma: 9,939
no t2i :(

also those pie charts hurt my eyes
Dec 5 2012 11:53AM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61157 - Karma: 118,846
Ya they left out soccer moms in this test...

Saying no t2i is like aw no 18-55
Dec 5 2012 1:06PM
0 0
profile picture
SSteezle
Posts: 9221 - Karma: 9,939
i was kidding, but after looking through the pictures the t2i is more than capable of taking most of them. I get that it's capturing moments, but I was a little disappointed for "photos of the year"
Dec 5 2012 1:28PM
0 0
profile picture
zbphoto
Posts: 7789 - Karma: 12,039
lol, no
Dec 5 2012 1:40PM
0 0
profile picture
SSteezle
Posts: 9221 - Karma: 9,939
lol, i'd love to hear why not
Dec 5 2012 1:46PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31039 - Karma: 29,013
it's capable, sure. But I bet 100% of all professionals, when given the resources, would not bring a t2i into battle as an A or B cam. There's nothing the t2i has featured that another body in Canon's lineup doesn't have, and it lacks in build quality, out of the box ISO, FPS, trustworthy, etc etc.

Obviously any camera can take a good image in the right hands, but it's all about choosing the right tool for the job.
Dec 5 2012 1:50PM
0 0
profile picture
[~_~]
Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273
Because Canon's crop sensors are worse than Hitler.
Dec 5 2012 2:37PM
0 0
profile picture
zbphoto
Posts: 7789 - Karma: 12,039
Pretty much.
Dec 5 2012 6:19PM
0 0
profile picture
TravelsTI
Posts: 1000 - Karma: 353
That made me chuckle.
Dec 5 2012 9:11PM
0 0
profile picture
.qzyxya
Posts: 1479 - Karma: -26
they really that bad? never used a 5d or a nikon so dont have anything to compare to
Dec 5 2012 9:16PM
0 0
profile picture
Downtofilm
Posts: 6896 - Karma: 20,399
Dec 5 2012 9:17PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31039 - Karma: 29,013
there's your problem

/inb4 FF shitstorm
Dec 5 2012 9:26PM
0 0
profile picture
Balto
Posts: 25985 - Karma: 4,398
once you go FF, crop really does go to complete shit

then once you deal with 6x7 negatives, FF seems like crap
Dec 5 2012 9:46PM
0 0
profile picture
zbphoto
Posts: 7789 - Karma: 12,039
Then once you deal with large format, 6x7 seems like crap
Dec 5 2012 9:57PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31039 - Karma: 29,013
Then you realize people don't realize this and you kill yourself
Dec 5 2012 10:04PM
0 0
profile picture
.qzyxya
Posts: 1479 - Karma: -26
haha
Dec 5 2012 10:19PM
0 0
profile picture
BolderPro
Posts: 767 - Karma: 426
I lold
Dec 5 2012 10:40PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)