Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
2013 Surface Double Time or 2013 Line Chronic
Posts: 431
-
Karma: 175
Hey guys just wanted to see which ski you prefer, the surface double time or the line chronic ? I will will be using them as my park ski, I hit everything in the park. I've ridden the double time in the past but I want to know more about the chronic. Any input is appreciated, thanks
Posts: 38
-
Karma: 9
Posts: 1634
-
Karma: 273
chronic is 92 mm in the waist, tip and tail rocker along with thin tip and tail which allows it to have a light swing weight and makes the ski a little more playful in the tip and tail. Camber under foot which gives you pop and energy you look for in a ski, cap wall construction, line claims it helps with edges not pulling out. That's the chronic in a few words, great ski, 4 of my bosses all different skiers skied it last year at the on snow and all came back and said they loved it. It seems like a great ski, I was on the fence between chronics and kinks, ended up with a kink because i'm not gonna be in the park too much. I don't like the double times honestly, I had a pair come into the shop I work at like two months ago, they felt like 2 by 4's under foot with a super thin tip and tail which makes it a little playful, just not a big fan of surface, but that's my opinion. I'd say the chronic, but i'm biased
Posts: 2310
-
Karma: 392
Just rode my chronics yesterday for the first time. It was the most fun I've ever had on skis, these skis are loaded with pop super lightweight I threw a 7 off a at most 10 ft jump. They are super playful in the tip and tail but underfoot the are extremely stable.
Posts: 431
-
Karma: 175
Thanks for the input guys, I guess my biggest concern is stability. I'm 6'4" and 200 lbs so that's an issue I run into frequently
Posts: 1983
-
Karma: 37,398
hit the nail on the head right there.
All times are Eastern (-4)
