Member of the Month

abjectwoe
May, 2025

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

The official SCIENCE nerd/geek thread

profile picture
chicken
Posts: 6844 - Karma: 2,122
because the other one got taken over by the gamers!
13 years ago
108 61
profile picture
chicken
Posts: 6844 - Karma: 2,122
you didn't even know what they were. so how can you say that they don't mean shit? I literally posted two things that I was stoked on at the time and a map of the milky way.

I might not be an expert on anything yet but I still have a decent amount of education in science and it's what I plan to do for my career. Sorry that I am enthusiastic about things like this.

Hell even if you don't really understand them I still like it when people are interested in pictures like this. after all a lot of science is funded by public dollars and we need to get the general population stoked on it.
12 years ago
2 1
profile picture
FuckAllOfYou
Posts: 3864 - Karma: 2,518
it would've made more sense even if you just posted a little bit about them, so people "like me" would have a chance to also 'enjoy' them. No context = stupid.

i'm not dumb, but don't expect everyone to understand what's posted without explanation. isn't that the point of the thread? jesus
12 years ago
1 0
profile picture
FuckAllOfYou
Posts: 3864 - Karma: 2,518
what? this is just a thread to look at pretty pictures? I came in here under the impression a "SCIENCE nerd/geek thread" would be a little bit less superficial
12 years ago
1 0
profile picture
corona
Posts: 12845 - Karma: 33,290
This is a skiing website with an average age of 16-18 with practically no formal scientific education.

If you're looking for anything more than cool pictures and fun facts then you're in the wrong place.

Although I doubt you'd understand anything other than 'superficial science' anyways, so I don't know what you're complaining about.
12 years ago
1 0
profile picture
chicken
Posts: 6844 - Karma: 2,122
what do you want to know about them? If you didn't understand what something was you could have asked instead of getting all upset.
12 years ago
2 0
profile picture
Arabian
Posts: 702 - Karma: 1,303
Why is someone going through and downvoting everything?
12 years ago
1 0
profile picture
BE..
Posts: 1185 - Karma: 81
http://youtu.be/Ir3v5yDk9Ws

12 years ago
0 1
profile picture
BE..
Posts: 1185 - Karma: 81
i fucked up, never mind
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
chicken
Posts: 6844 - Karma: 2,122


12 years ago
1 0
profile picture
DrZoidberg
Posts: 5676 - Karma: 4,299
We covered it for 2/3 of p chem last semester. Like, particle in a box, harmonic oscillator, the rotor, central force problem, among other things. H and He treatments. A whole bunch of stuff. I liked it, and my grades actually went up when we started that since kinetics was boring, to me anyway.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
chicken
Posts: 6844 - Karma: 2,122
that's cool! I have also taken a couple basic quantum mechanics courses and also a course on nuclear physics. Right now I am taking my first "real" quantum mechanics course which basically goes over everything again in a mathematically rigorous way. Then after that I still have two more courses to take in my undergrad (a second course in QM and then a particle physics course which is an introduction to QFT). I also might take atomic and molecular physics if I can fit it in. It's probably similar to what you are taking. I have self studied that subject quite a lot from Bransden and Joachain though so I don't know if I need the course.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
chicken
Posts: 6844 - Karma: 2,122
what are you planning to do with your chem degree Dr.Z?
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
DrZoidberg
Posts: 5676 - Karma: 4,299
Good question. Go to school more? Ask cern if they want people to shoot particles at other particles. That would awesome, but I'd imagine they're not always hiring. Teach? No idea. I'm just going on the idea that, since I enjoy what I'm studying, I can hopefully get a job I like. Some might consider that a bit, um, stupid, but whatever. It's not like a chem degree is a bad one to have, so I'd be better off than having like a history of ancient greek pots degree or something.

I'd consider working with instrumentation. I like building things, taking them apart, all that. Instruments seem to combine that well. Which is why I went after getting on the EEM spec thing. If I took it that far, I'd always be looking out for when some fancy facility like cern needs somebody to look after their detectors. Every time I go into a lab, I'm like, if they wouldn't kill me I'd take that apart. I could just be a spectroscopist or something and shoot lasers at stuff all day. At least my job description would be funny. Particle physics and nuke physics are cool too. I'd consider learning more physics in later schooling, if I went.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Cannaburner
Posts: 1007 - Karma: 785
My physics hw involved a question where the graph had no units. I was mad.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
chicken
Posts: 6844 - Karma: 2,122
why?
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Arabian
Posts: 702 - Karma: 1,303
You're not going to get this for a looooong time. Alternative, graded, and C*-algebras are some heavy stuff, and you won't have the proper foundations to cover quantum algebras until you've finished Real and Complex by Rudin, and moved onto the graduate series for quantum algebra in Kassel's book: http://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Groups-Graduate-Texts-Mathematics/dp/0387943706


Good luck
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
chicken
Posts: 6844 - Karma: 2,122
ok more mathematically rigorous than the last time I took quantum mechanics haha. I don't know what that means. I just started taking the course.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
chicken
Posts: 6844 - Karma: 2,122
if it's really that complicated then i'm assuming there wont be any formal rigour that would satisfy a math major though.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61949 - Karma: 126,672
Oh look, chicken made another thread to boast about himself...


get some friends or a hobby, jesus.
12 years ago
3 2
profile picture
chicken
Posts: 6844 - Karma: 2,122
yeah man. in 2012. and I don't see how this is boasting about myself.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
FuckAllOfYou
Posts: 3864 - Karma: 2,518
>implying i'm dumb
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
FuckAllOfYou
Posts: 3864 - Karma: 2,518
i must have came in here expecting something shitty and I thought I was right, but now I see real discussion and i'm interested. sorry!
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Brule.
Posts: 3988 - Karma: 6,714
Psssshh, OP's definition of "science" doesn't compare to this:

Click for larger image
Click for larger image
Click for larger image
Click for larger image
Click for larger image
Click for larger image

None of that vegan b.s.
12 years ago
1 1
profile picture
DrZoidberg
Posts: 5676 - Karma: 4,299
Math people...

I found the probability function for a particle in a box being in the left quarter of the box. So now they want the quantum number, n, that maximizes that. That would involve setting the function to 0 and solving, right? I know for a fact that my function is correct. So I did that, and got into a mess of trig functions and n's. Halp? I'm probably missing some incredibly helpful trig identity or exponential thing or something. Work with some explanations is attached, and none of my friends do this stuff, hence why I'm here.

All I need is to solve for n really, a math issue now, no QM knowledge needed. Unless I'm going about this all wrong, in which case it's a QM issue. Fuck it's sideways, whatever, any help is greatly appreciated. Haven't done this in a while so I'm derping all over.

Click for larger image
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
corona
Posts: 12845 - Karma: 33,290
implying you've probably never studied anything science related past high school.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Dirac
Posts: 1304 - Karma: 335
since you are only dealing with integer values of n I think you would be better of showing that when n is even then P=1/4 and then showing that when n=1,5,9 you are subtracting a decreasing sequence from 1/4 and when n=3,7,11 you are adding a decreasing sequence, so then maximum is when n=3.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
DrZoidberg
Posts: 5676 - Karma: 4,299
That's interesting, I'll have too look into that later.

But shit, I'm off my math game. They wanted the slope of the probability for n=4 at some point in the box, which is easy. Just get the f' and evaluate, and I was putting in the value for x too early. Serious amateur mistake right there. Also I haven't done an ordinary diff eq in a while...
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Zimmerman
Posts: 6992 - Karma: 1,021
I grew up on astronomy/cosmology documentaries. And have taken several courses on the topic. Great shit.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Wompuscat
Posts: 818 - Karma: 380
Mmmmm biochemistry.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
CliffyByro
Posts: 5678 - Karma: 3,904
i got an overall score of 19/20 in my recent Engineering Mathematics course and an 18/20 in Electronic and Mechanical Systems despite not having a fucking clue how to electronics GOML
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
a_pla5tic_bag
Posts: 9244 - Karma: 5,692
my MCAT is tomorrow. herp.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
FuckAllOfYou
Posts: 3864 - Karma: 2,518
implying you don't know the first thing about me
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
chicken
Posts: 6844 - Karma: 2,122
so we are officially in interstellar space now. time to party!
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Darth.Maul
Posts: 2472 - Karma: 652
e^(ipi)+1=0 is my favorite math equation/identity.

#nerdout
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
DrZoidberg
Posts: 5676 - Karma: 4,299
Search for the Exit: Voyager 1 at Heliosphere's Border with the Galaxy

S. M. Krimigis et al. Science 341, 144 (2013);

Posted in post what's on your mind thread but might as well throw it here. That should get you to the sciency article about this. I believe it's the sort of thing you can get on a college's internet if they subscribe, or obviously if you subscribe. It does get rather dense though, considering I'm not familiar with space like these dudes are.

12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
blatt
Posts: 5584 - Karma: 3,097
Go read some real biotechnology articles: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
chicken
Posts: 6844 - Karma: 2,122
yeah I read that one awhile ago when it was published. today is when NASA made it "official" though.

if someone can't download the pdf i'm sure they could obtain one messaging someone in this thread...
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
chicken
Posts: 6844 - Karma: 2,122
*by messaging.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
SFB
Posts: 8895 - Karma: 26,363
why do you always start shit with chicken then blame him for being a douche.
he is a douche but chill out.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
blatt
Posts: 5584 - Karma: 3,097
Go read some real biotechnology articles: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Bodhisattva_
Posts: 5749 - Karma: 2,009
Hope to understand some of this shit soon!
Starting my first year in college as an ecology major at MSU.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
chicken
Posts: 6844 - Karma: 2,122
I hope you take some math courses. mathematical biology is some pretty cool stuff. lots of applications in ecology too.

We did a section on ecology in one of my math courses. check it out! (chapter 11)

http://www.math.upatras.gr/~bountis/files/def-eq.pdf
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
corona
Posts: 12845 - Karma: 33,290
implying I'm going the logical route and regarding you as falling into the vast majority of NSers.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
howlongcanausern
Posts: 4982 - Karma: 1,737
yet another stellar achievement brought to you by the taxpayers of the USA
12 years ago
1 1
profile picture
corona
Posts: 12845 - Karma: 33,290
thank you everyone. also not just USA since some technologies were developed in other countries. and a lot of brains behind it came from other countries. thanks world.
12 years ago
1 0
profile picture
howlongcanausern
Posts: 4982 - Karma: 1,737
i can't hear you... no sound on the moon

Click for larger image
12 years ago
1 0
profile picture
DrZoidberg
Posts: 5676 - Karma: 4,299
It's like a pun, or something
Click for larger image

Got more in depth with this EEM spec thing. It sounds fun. Build it, see what doesn't work, come up with a solution, test and see. Science. We're gonna locate some parts and start building it soon.
12 years ago
0 0
profile picture
chicken
Posts: 6844 - Karma: 2,122
how did it go?
11 years ago
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4); Currently it's 6:34AM