Member of the Month

JalmarKalmar
April, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Rodeo 3/sw rodeo 3

profile picture
thebusiness19
Posts: 794 - Karma: 6,715
Is this possible??? I know flat 3 is like clearly possibly but can u stop the rodeo rotation at 360???
Jul 2 2012 12:42PM
1 0
profile picture
easy.steezy
Posts: 2931 - Karma: 1,056
By definition, rodeo 3s don't exist.  A rodeo is a flip with a spin, and since a full flip is 360 degrees, the minimum amount of spinning in a rodeo is 540 degrees.  Most flat 3s aren't actually flatspins, but since they're not rodeos they're just shoved under that category.  I call flat 3s wackflips, cause they're just slightly off axis, and most of the time with a japan or safety grab.
Jul 2 2012 12:52PM
0 0
profile picture
ColinB
Posts: 1452 - Karma: 2,236
flat 3.. rodeo 3.. i'd consider them to be the same thing. after all, a flatspin is technically just a less inverted rodeo
Jul 2 2012 1:00PM
0 0
profile picture
Lapander
Posts: 400 - Karma: 10
How about.. NO!!!!!
Jul 2 2012 1:27PM
0 0
profile picture
ColinB
Posts: 1452 - Karma: 2,236
alright sick!
Jul 2 2012 1:38PM
0 0
profile picture
wameron
Posts: 1233 - Karma: 1,220
eric pollard does flat 3s
Jul 2 2012 2:31PM
0 0
profile picture
JWoods
Posts: 2369 - Karma: 2,635
No, You are wrong. A flat spin is a flat spin and a rodeo is a rodeo. There is no such thing as rodeo 3 and there never will be.
Jul 2 2012 2:33PM
0 0
profile picture
jeR.
Posts: 1325 - Karma: 58
here's another similar question i've always thought about: if the opposite of ro 5 is misty 5, then what is the opposite of a flat 3 called? i assume itd be a frontflippy type thing, like a misty but without landing switch. if anyone has vids of anyone doing this trick thatd be cool
Jul 2 2012 2:55PM
0 0
profile picture
ColinB
Posts: 1452 - Karma: 2,236
well obviously nobody calls it a rodeo 3. but please explain to me the difference between a flatspin and a rodeo? and don't say "flatspins are less inverted" because from what i've seen/experienced, "flatspin" and "rodeo" are completely interchangeable depending on preference. unless in the pipe, i consider rodeos in the pipe to be "flatspins"
Jul 2 2012 3:10PM
0 0
profile picture
VanMelle
Posts: 1277 - Karma: 1,140
Spencer did something that was what i thought between a flat and rodeo 3...he figured a true flat 3...

at 1:07
https://www.newschoolers.com/membervideo/435755.0/Spencer-Milbocker-Ain't-No-Joke?s=139235&t=2&o=8
Jul 2 2012 3:11PM
0 0
profile picture
Toaster-Tony
Posts: 3531 - Karma: 5,850
It's very possible, but known in the skiing world as a backflip.
Jul 2 2012 3:16PM
0 0
profile picture
Brown_Bag
Posts: 273 - Karma: 677

i agree

Jul 2 2012 3:31PM
0 0
profile picture
ColinB
Posts: 1452 - Karma: 2,236
that is implying that a backflip-180 is a rodeo. however i'm pretty sure that its relatively well known that a backflip-180 is a flare..
Jul 2 2012 3:37PM
0 0
profile picture
lukemeahan.
Posts: 1689 - Karma: 330
I thought rodeos and flatspins were the same thing
Jul 2 2012 4:37PM
0 0
profile picture
KillaSteeze
Posts: 3329 - Karma: 351
pretty similar id say, but just alitttle different
Jul 2 2012 4:39PM
0 0
profile picture
TORVINEN
Posts: 177 - Karma: 61
Kooters got sw rod 3s on lock. its called "the hot Karl"
Jul 2 2012 5:59PM
0 0
profile picture
CrotchKiller
Posts: 9037 - Karma: 6,940
you literally could not of contradicted yourself harder in one sentence
Jul 2 2012 6:03PM
0 0
profile picture
JWoods
Posts: 2369 - Karma: 2,635
You are so dumb. A flare is only a back180 in the pipe otherwise yeah technically it's a rodeo or in acrobatics a half twist. Although no one does rodeos like backflip then a 180 most rodeos are a backwards flipping motion with spins. The difference between a fucking flatspin and rodeo is that a flat spin is just that, a spin. There is no flip in a flatspin I can't find the gif but image laying on your side on the floor and spinning around. That is a flat spin. a rodeo is like I said, a backwards FLIP with spin. Granted some people do rodeos that are VERY close to flatspins and thrown super flat at that point I could see someone calling one the other or so forth but there is a difference between the two. Also there is no such thing as rodeo 3 because that would be a 180 degree spin and 180 degree of flip, also known as falling on your head upside down and backwards. On that note a flat 3 is not a wackflip there is a HUGE difference. just because you throw a backflip slightly off axis (wackflip) and tweak the grab a little or grab safety doesn't mean its a flat three dipshits it's just a wackflip.
Jul 2 2012 6:32PM
0 0
profile picture
ColinB
Posts: 1452 - Karma: 2,236
so basically we're saying the same exact thing. you're just too silly to realize it and just nod your head and be like "oh okay i guess you can look at it that way"
Jul 2 2012 6:41PM
0 0
profile picture
JWoods
Posts: 2369 - Karma: 2,635
Can you read?
Jul 2 2012 6:47PM
0 0
profile picture
SpookyCat
Posts: 1232 - Karma: -2,617
Dude you're not going to win this one. Remember this is the site where kids think a triple backflip with a 180 thrown at the end is a triple rodeo...

You're going to have better luck convincing Keefer that he's not made of meat blocks... impossible.
Jul 2 2012 6:52PM
0 0
profile picture
JWoods
Posts: 2369 - Karma: 2,635
Wait he isn't? I've always just known him as Meat
Jul 2 2012 6:57PM
0 0
profile picture
ColinB
Posts: 1452 - Karma: 2,236
quite well actually. i agree with some of the stuff that he's saying. he's just not willing to see that the majority of our arguments are pretty much saying the same thing as far as rodeo/flatspin. they are too close to distinguish, thus people use the terms based on preference. i'll admit that most people look at flares as only in the pipe, i just don't look at things like backflip-180s as rodeos. because i've always looked at rodeos as an off axis trick.
Jul 2 2012 6:58PM
0 0
profile picture
JWoods
Posts: 2369 - Karma: 2,635
People rarely do them so close that you can't really tell and for that reason they have different names. People use the terms based on preference but that's wrong. They are different tricks for a reason, because they are very different.
Jul 2 2012 7:03PM
0 0
profile picture
Flowbear
Posts: 339 - Karma: 828
rdeo 3 is definetly possible i've been tryin them on my trampoline all you have to do is shifty forwards to make it a 3.
Jul 2 2012 10:06PM
0 0
profile picture
JWoods
Posts: 2369 - Karma: 2,635
Then it's not a rodeo shit head
Jul 2 2012 11:23PM
0 0
profile picture
SpookyCat
Posts: 1232 - Karma: -2,617
When blocks of meat join together, like the flexibility of a ballerina and the jumping abilities of a park skier, it becomes a singularity... a singularity of meat. beautiful, beautiful meat.

[IMG]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_739zRcIHeOs/TL5fyFIEkKI/AAAAAAAAABY/XH0YNoWgRbw/s1600/Smb4Bit.png{/IMG]
Jul 3 2012 1:44AM
0 0
profile picture
SpookyCat
Posts: 1232 - Karma: -2,617
Click for larger image
Jul 3 2012 1:45AM
0 0
profile picture
JWoods
Posts: 2369 - Karma: 2,635
It is beautiful, as if god himself created the creature with great loving from 1-2 lb packages of ground beef from the supermarket. The result boggles the mind and leaves intense and often provocative feelings deep in one's soul.
Jul 3 2012 1:49AM
0 0
profile picture
easy.steezy
Posts: 2931 - Karma: 1,056
Andy Mahre(sp?) does a really sick on in On Top of Hood, too.  I'm not saying they're impossible, just most of the time "flat 3s" are not actually flat spins.  An actual flatspin 360 looks dope.

And at the second part of the OP, a switch rodeo 3 is still impossible because like I said, the least amount of spinning in any rodeo is 540.  I think I've seen bdog do a switch cork 3, and I've seen footy of Karl Fostvedt(sp?) and Joss Christensen have done switch lincoln loops.  Also, I wanna say I've seen Colby West and Torin do switch wackflips.
Jul 3 2012 8:38AM
0 0
profile picture
L.G.P.
Posts: 906 - Karma: 187
a rodeo 3 almost looks like a weird backflip im guessing and for a sw rodeo 3, i would assume that u could do a rodeo 5 but then shifty back to a 360. i guess it would be possible
Jul 3 2012 9:05AM
0 0
profile picture
Flowbear
Posts: 339 - Karma: 828
uh it kinda is same rotation you just add a shifty.
Jul 3 2012 3:00PM
0 0
profile picture
CrotchKiller
Posts: 9037 - Karma: 6,940
point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh point and him and laugh
Jul 3 2012 3:47PM
0 0
profile picture
SpookyCat
Posts: 1232 - Karma: -2,617
by your logic we can call 360s 540s just as long as you spin the 540 degrees at some point, even if you land the same way you took off the jump.

does that make any sense to you because it sure as hell doesn't to any skier who isn't an idiot.
Jul 3 2012 9:26PM
0 0
profile picture
Chubz.
Posts: 13918 - Karma: 25,658
you're my favorite ns member. ever.
Jul 3 2012 9:29PM
0 0
profile picture
JWoods
Posts: 2369 - Karma: 2,635
.
Jul 3 2012 9:46PM
0 0
profile picture
Flowbear
Posts: 339 - Karma: 828
I have no clue what ur talking about what u just said makes no sense to me im saying do the trick the same as a rodeo 5 but just shifty forward in the air. And steezemaster24 said the exact same thing as me if u need clarification on what im saying.
Jul 3 2012 11:25PM
0 0
profile picture
thebusiness19
Posts: 794 - Karma: 6,715
Nah dude thats a sw lincoln, he just dips the right shoulder and rolls which is a lincoln
Jul 4 2012 1:00AM
0 0
profile picture
JWoods
Posts: 2369 - Karma: 2,635
Yeah DCrew is just a fucking idiot
Jul 4 2012 1:26AM
0 0
profile picture
SpookyCat
Posts: 1232 - Karma: -2,617
You're missing the point. At its most simple description a rodeo is a flip backwards with at LEAST a 180 spin, meaning you have to take off one way and land the other direction for it to be a rodeo, meaning a RODEO, NOT SPINS ADDED INTO A RODEO AS IN A RODEO 720 (that's for all the nit-picking bitches on this site). You can continue to be little bitches and fight with what makes a rodeo or a flat 5 but to say that you can do a rodeo 3 shows that you have no understanding of what a rodeo is as a trick.

If you think we're wrong about this, go ask one of your favorite pros what they think of your idea of a rodeo 3, I bet they'll laugh in your face and then spit in it.
Jul 4 2012 2:58AM
0 0
profile picture
JWoods
Posts: 2369 - Karma: 2,635
In conclusion rodeo three isn't real, you're all stupid and this thread is now about
AMERICA!
Click for larger imageClick for larger imageClick for larger imageClick for larger image
Jul 4 2012 3:37AM
0 0
profile picture
thebusiness19
Posts: 794 - Karma: 6,715
I think ur slightly overthinking it. Haha its kinda hard to respond with JWoods flipping the thread on me. Anywho, I was asking for like a rodeo type of rotation in which you dip your shoulder and go off axis but end at 360. Okay yeah maybe it hurts the "definition of the trick", people said the same thing with my "cork zero" thread. "A cork is a spin off axis and if you don't spin it can't be considered a cork". Again I dont really care about the definition of the trick or what its called I am just curious if someone can get off axis and return back with no spin (as I was shown is possible by Adam Delorme). Similarly, I don't care if it hurts the definition of the trick, I was just curious if someone can do that type of rotation with only a 360, which apparently might even be possible with just a 180, (Henrik Harlaut did a transfer from one QP to another with what pretty much looked like a flat 180)
Jul 4 2012 12:45PM
0 0
profile picture
Flowbear
Posts: 339 - Karma: 828
Like said before i don't care about the definition either and u don't have to call it a rodeo if u dont want to. and i don't think the pros would give a crap they're just out there to have fun
Jul 4 2012 1:47PM
0 0
profile picture
JWoods
Posts: 2369 - Karma: 2,635
Yeah that's what we like to call a bio 360
Jul 4 2012 2:34PM
0 0
profile picture
thebusiness19
Posts: 794 - Karma: 6,715
The people who came up with the definition probably just specified "with a spin" because they thought otherwiae it would be impossible to do like go off axis without a spin, which people like Delorme are proving is wrong
Jul 4 2012 2:37PM
0 0
profile picture
easy.steezy
Posts: 2931 - Karma: 1,056
Why do you keep mentioning Delorme.  I have never seen him do anything like you're describing.  All of the footy of him doing 3s that I've seen consisted of corks and lincolns.
Jul 4 2012 11:34PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)