Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Icelantic Danollies or Armada Thalls?
Posts: 197
-
Karma: 10
Hey I found some good deals on the 2011/2012 models of both skis, 170 for the Danollie and 171 for the Thall. I was wondering what every one's experience was with each. I understand they both have a good amount of flex to them which I'm looking for, since I skied the fuckin 10/11 suspects which were pretty stiff and had awful durability. I ski about 60% rails 40% jumps and I'm 5' 8" 135 lbs.
Posts: 685
-
Karma: 235
i am 5'9" 140 and i ride a 176 t hall. 171 will be nice on rails but i worry it wouldnt be enough ski for you on a jump bigger than 20 ft. next years is stiff underfoot and gets softer at the very tip and tail. still a stiff ski overall tho.likes to go fast on hard snow.
havent skied the icelantics.
Posts: 10581
-
Karma: 11,092
thalls because they're not icelantics. lol
Posts: 197
-
Karma: 10
Well I'm from the midwest so we don't have the biggest jumps out hurr..thanks i'll keep that in mind
Posts: 5679
-
Karma: 2,792
AR7 are also good, very similar to T-Halls for a cheaper price. If you are interested in more info pm me.
Posts: 8385
-
Karma: 2,060
They are stiffer though, he wants flexy
Posts: 5679
-
Karma: 2,792
true but IMO they are pretty flexy after skiing on them for a season. Amazingly poppy and can flex enough for good butters also they hold up on any jump or rail with the stiffness and durability. Just saying he should check em out.
Posts: 328
-
Karma: 1,056
Posts: 1207
-
Karma: 263
Icelantic, You wont be disappointed!
Posts: 1124
-
Karma: 387
I'm with him I absolutely love my danollies.
Posts: 1571
-
Karma: 1,302
def the thalls, love em to death
Posts: 2455
-
Karma: 5,745
Icelantics are really light. I demoed a pair of 170's and i could do flat ground 3's easy and im 5'8" and 110 lbs
All times are Eastern (-4)
