Member of the Month

theabortionator
April, 2025

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Question about twixtor

profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
how long does it take people to render twixtor clips? what computer do you have?

13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61936 - Karma: 126,480
Just don't use it.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
but that's not what i asked...
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
dispatchQ_main
Posts: 2619 - Karma: 629
it takes a while. but so does any other plugin. I run a gtx with 8gigs on my desktop and it takes just as long as my base acer laptop to render.

Oh and dont use it.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
[J_Gasper]
Posts: 2983 - Karma: 1,594
if your gonna use it, use it correctly. if your using it to ramp slo mo and not get crazy with it. its fine.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
deciblast
Posts: 52 - Karma: 10
Motion 5 is $50 and can do the same thing as Twixtor now using Optical Flow. Shoot at 720 60p with a shutter at least 1/1600 and then retime to 15% and choose Optical Flow.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
gravel
Posts: 5524 - Karma: 42,379
the only appropriate time to use twixtor, is as one guy up there said, for ramp slow mo.... and even then, no more than 50% back...
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
okay i really don't care when it's necessary, that's not my question at all. Not trying to sound like a dick but this argument happens every day. I'm wondering how long it takes people to render a clip they twixtor. can anyone help, please? it's taking me about 20 minutes per clip and this seems way too long..
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61936 - Karma: 126,480
the only way it will be faster is with a faster computer
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
[evan]
Posts: 5628 - Karma: 117
Nope that seems accurate. Yesterday I put together my first edit and used twixtor in almost every shot, took a solid 18 hrs to render like 3/4 of it.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
will_powder
Posts: 3194 - Karma: 5,445
Well thats gonna suck...
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
[evan]
Posts: 5628 - Karma: 117
lol-at-this-guy-thinking-i-made-an-entire-edit-with-twixtor.jpeg

i was waiting for somebody to absoultely rage at me, but w/e
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61936 - Karma: 126,480
in EVERY SHOT? you have got to be kidding me.....
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
why does it bother you? it's not like it affects you in any way whatsoever. GET OVER IT, some of us like twixtor
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
will_powder
Posts: 3194 - Karma: 5,445
I guarantee you guys will use too much, and not give a crap about the massive amounts of warping some of the shots will most likely have.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61936 - Karma: 126,480
tell me who you really are and ill tell you why i dont think he should use twixtor.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
i don't care why you don't think he should use twixtor.. some of us like the way it looks and that's enough of a reason to use it. stop acting like your opinion matters.

i don't know who you are i joined a few weeks ago, you just seem like you hate on everything
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61936 - Karma: 126,480
Twixtor is cliche and amateur as fuck, i dont care if you "like how it looks" its pointless, overused and drags along shit. Plus, 90% of the people who use twixtor just use to to slow it down to like 10% and its always got mad warping and blurring. Shooting 60p, conform to 24, thats plenty slow. There is no practical use for twixor, since its so glitchy, unless you have some dumb ass paying you to make some stupid edit of super slow mo shit. If someone really wants slow motion and they are serious about it, they'll hire someone with a red/phantom.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
no you misread. i really don't care what you think about it. I like it and i'm going to use it. your opinion sucks
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
family_vacation
Posts: 6200 - Karma: 7,840
jesus that edit is going to be painful to watch.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61936 - Karma: 126,480
Sorry that the more experienced, more knowledgable person gave you an opinion and advice. You're definitely right, I'm definitely wrong, you DEFINITELY know what you're talking about. Your edit is gonna be so banger right when the dubstep drops and the skier is moving sooo slow and its like hes just paused in the air then 30 seconds later he lands...
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
don't toot your own horn. honestly, there are plenty of edits you make that aren't very "professional" looking. I have my opinion and you have yours. let me thread go back to my question about twixtor
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61936 - Karma: 126,480
Dude, you're so right. I'm sorry I ever challenged your opinion, its obviously the right one.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
Jaymon
Posts: 860 - Karma: 1,213
with a name like firstdropkid and a question about twixtor you know its gonna be a banger
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
are you sarcastic because your fat or are you fat because you're sarcastic
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61936 - Karma: 126,480
Dude, you're so witty, i can't believe i ever tried to talk down on you.


So who are you?
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
you're just annoying, leave my thread so people can actually help
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61936 - Karma: 126,480
People already did help you! even i did, jesus.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
okay then lets just let the thread die. im sick of your bullshit
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
blakroc
Posts: 2323 - Karma: 28
I wouldn't worry about the hate,

every little kid on here takes what eheath says proclaiming it as the word of god and has it tattooed on their forearms like the ten commandments so they can assess their responses to a thread accordingly.

Yes twixor is overused by kids in ski edits, no it doesn't effect me or anyone else besides they might take 2 seconds out of their day skipping through an edit. NS needs to stop being so cynical, if you believe filming is an art form you should let ppl do whatever they want and not try to control their work. Some of the best films and art of the century we're done breaking the rules so fuck off and shut up no body cares about ur stupid little clickish, cynical, highschool bullshit rules let people do what they want.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
thankyou. eheath needs to get off his high horse. everyone has their own opinion on what looks good and that's why filming is an art.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
family_vacation
Posts: 6200 - Karma: 7,840
Art is also cool when the pieces are unique. With twixtor, you end up with a bunch of identical snore fests which convert a single trick into a 20 second ordeal.

Not to mention the fact that twixtor decimates footage with warping. Twixtor is played.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
can we please just let people do what they want with twixtor without all the twixtor haters invading every thread. it's pretty simple.. an opinion is an opinion stop forcing yours on others
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
gwhitey
Posts: 2249 - Karma: 312
i just came in here to say lol.
lol
lol
lol
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
quaive
Posts: 1055 - Karma: 99
In this case I'd agree with eheath ONE HUNDRED percent. I enjoy slow motion, adds a more dramatic effect, but when I see an edit that a 14 year old made using twixtor in every shot it makes me cringe. I don't know why you would second guess eheath's opinion about filming, considering he is WAY more experienced than you, and in this case I think he does not need to get off his high horse. He's right, you're wrong, don't use twixtor it looks tacky.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
honestly i'm not a fan of most of the work that eheath does. if he's hating twixtor so much why would he have bought the fs100 which has 120fps.

here is his test edit, i suggest he tries out twixtor because it looks a hell of a lot better.

13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
family_vacation
Posts: 6200 - Karma: 7,840
hahahaha

There are countless reasons (amazing low light capability, interchangeable lenses, reduced aliasing, etc) that the fs100 is amazing, the frame rate is not one of them. I don't think anyone who knew anything about cameras would be dumb enough to purchase one for the low quality extra frame rates.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
i know i just thought it was really funny how shitty his "slow-mo edit" came out
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
family_vacation
Posts: 6200 - Karma: 7,840
Read the description on vimeo. This is clearly a test, not an "edit" like you think it is. He knows the limitations of this feature, and you should stop posting.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
well regardless it was a shitty "test" if that's what you want to call it. If that was 120fps I think he was doing something wrong......not using twixtor
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
quaive
Posts: 1055 - Karma: 99
You are really that thick-skulled? That was the slowest slow motion that would ever be practical in any use of filming. You need to realize that you don't always need twixtor let alone slow motion to make your shots look "cool". The slow motion in that edit was fine, realistically there's no practical use to go slower. I don't really understand why you are being so critical on a 'test' edit. We get it, you're a 13 year old keyboard hero who thinks he's an m&a know-it-all. Truth is you really aren't. Before coming to more assumptions I would like to see some of your edits to further evaluate.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
txixtor does much better slow mo than his "120fps" there's no arguing it
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
quaive
Posts: 1055 - Karma: 99
Oh my God... I give up.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
don't give up just try using twixtor for a smoother slowmo
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61936 - Karma: 126,480
hahahahahahah how is a "test" shitty? did you read the description? you obviously didnt, id go back and read it then come back and post.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
firstdropkid
Posts: 149 - Karma: 63
I read it and still go by what I said
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61936 - Karma: 126,480
i wrote

"Shot with the "smooth slow motion" mode on my fs100 which comes out to 120fps/1080i60i in post. Put shots in a 720p timeline to try and preserve some quality but as you can see in full screen that the images resolution is unusable for online content. This mode could work well if used in a SD timeline for dvd, but while you save the quality of these shots you degrade your other shots, kind of pointless"


did you miss the fact that i saids its not usable even at an SD level? it was a fucking test dude, i had NEVER used the feature before and i did not buy an fs100 for the feature. You need to give the fuck up and tell me who you really are, this alais is getting fucking old.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
[evan]
Posts: 5628 - Karma: 117
You are seriously stupid as shit, I was joking about saying I made a twixtor edit, (Read my next post everybody), but you seem to have a hard on for it. Just listen to what heath says, then kill youself, I dont know about anybody else, but I think you should stick to NSG
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
quaive
Posts: 1055 - Karma: 99
No. Quit Newschoolers.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
gravel
Posts: 5524 - Karma: 42,379
bahahahahaha. you're honestly pretty damn retarded. are you really trying to argue that a shitty little plug-in that distorts, warps, and alters the original image in the interpolation of missing frames is BETTER than a slowing down of REAL, unaltered, unwarped, undistorted video? Wow. really. i'd agree, fake and warped is always much better than real and smooth.
13 years ago
0 0
profile picture
juicedrummer11
Posts: 1960 - Karma: 1,331
Click for larger image
13 years ago
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4); Currently it's 7:30AM