New rossi S3 or SCIMATAR

So as I'm sure you know the S3 is pretty much a skinnier S7 and skis very much the same.  For my money it's geared a bit more towards the older guy that is afraid to go to a wider ski but wants rocker and a more modern shape.  It still skis awesome and is super versatile but a bit more directional and all mountain in shape.  The Scimitar I love, but then again I have been skiing the S6 since it was the Steeze.  Much like the S3, the Scimitar is a narrower version of the Sickle (S6) and like its big brother is a bit more jib inspired.  The rocker profile is more balance towards the true center of the ski, and while not as aggressive as you find in the S3 is still plenty for shredding lighter snow days and maching crud and crust.  I'm sure people that are more rail focused than me will say its a bit wide for proper rail control but I really like it for all things park as well and the full rocker shape makes it hard to catch an edge if you come up a bit short on rotation.  So the S3 is a sweet ski but my vote is for the Scimitar, and its $100 cheaper.

i just picked up the scimitars... have yet to ski em tho.

im hoping they are poppy enough, never been on a rockerd ski for park before.

my answer to ur questions would be to get the scimitars. 98 underfoot is great for rails. plus the rocker is called spin turn or something so they will be easy to maneuver

The scimatar sounds more like what I'm looking for I guess. No point really getting a skinnier S7 and I can see how it would be geared towards the older crowd or even tele skiers.

So is the Scimatar cambered under foot out to tail and tip rocker? And I can actually get the S3 a little cheaper then I can get the Scimatar, $350 vs $395 I believe.

So it's flat under foot like the S7 and then has tip and tail rocker?

s7 and s3 have the rockered tip n tails, camber underfoot

sickle and scimitar have complete reverse camber profile, although im pretty sure its pretty mellow

input for the s3: i rode the s3 Koopman all last season in the park. I loved it so buttery you could press for days, but they where still stiff enough to hit 50ft park jumps. I had the 168 and with the tip/tail rocker the ski measured 164 from contact points you may wana go a size up on the s3.

CONS: riding switch on groomers felt awkward (may have been the rocker in the tip/tail), edges fell out by end of my season

The Koopman is a different shape I believe then what I am looking at, here is what I am talking about for the S3 http://www.evo.com/skis/rossignol-s3.aspx?gclid=CJzRjt2ao6sCFUdrKgodnCg34Q#utm_source=googlebase&utm_medium=shoppingengine

The Koopmans were the kids versions or the cheaper version I believe. The more I'm looking the more I wan't a pair of S5's, last years top sheet because Will Barras grpahics are the shiz!