Red Bull Unrailistic | LIVE Broadcast

Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Quick Question On Sir Francis Bacons

profile picture
willyg0808
Posts: 4231 - Karma: 1,364
OK So I'm getting my first powder stick this year and I would like to get some bacons. I am 5'6 but growing quick. Do you think I could handle a 178? Or should I rock the 172? I want a ski I can keep for a while, but I also want to be able to control them in tree runs, ect. I currently ride 166 afterbangs.
Aug 15 2011 11:07PM
0 0
profile picture
J.S.
Posts: 359 - Karma: 74
Go for the 178s.
Aug 15 2011 11:27PM
0 0
profile picture
argo801
Posts: 602 - Karma: 39
height doesnt matter at all         it all weight my man      you should know this

Aug 15 2011 11:38PM
0 0
profile picture
blatt
Posts: 5584 - Karma: 3,097
go 178.
Aug 16 2011 12:10AM
0 0
profile picture
Bender.
Posts: 711 - Karma: 659
This.
I'd get the 178 if I were you.
Aug 16 2011 12:15AM
0 0
profile picture
J-Sway
Posts: 685 - Karma: 111

Dude Measure out 6cm. Thats not that much at all I would go with the 178. I weigh 125pounds, had last years 172 bacons and wish I would have gotten them in a biger size. Too Me It feels like that little difference in size comes down to skiing ability.

Aug 16 2011 2:57AM
0 0
profile picture
Gstrong
Posts: 4776 - Karma: 518
I was in the same predicament last september, unfortunately I got the 172, now there too small, go 178.
Aug 16 2011 6:01AM
0 0
profile picture
belden...
Posts: 2914 - Karma: 1,273
Alright now that you have your answer (178 for sure) Can I steal this thread and ask, can you use sfb as an all mountain (park to pow) ski?
Aug 16 2011 9:01AM
0 0
profile picture
Bender.
Posts: 711 - Karma: 659
I found them really versatile (last season's model). I used them on hardback in the park and for the deep stuff. They will suck ass if it's shear ice your skiing on. So, anything but ice I found them to be awesome. In the pow in trees they shut down speed soooo fast. They were great.
Aug 16 2011 7:09PM
0 0
profile picture
Gstrong
Posts: 4776 - Karma: 518
Yes
Aug 17 2011 5:48AM
0 0
profile picture
mountainviper
Posts: 1931 - Karma: -3
Yeah dude I rode last years SFR for everything....sucks cause I didn't actually realize just how versatile they were till halfway through the season....the 12s look even more versatile with the new sidecut....and that width underfoot is so stable on boxes it's almost like cheating...haha
Aug 17 2011 9:27AM
0 0
profile picture
thomjphilly
Posts: 181 - Karma: 10
The 2012 SFB may be the most versatile ski I have skied in a long time.  The shape is a bit more narrow than the previous years but it keeps the near symmetrical shape and true symmetrical flex so it rails turns, is solid in the park, and killer everywhere else. 
http://www.skis.com/powder-skis/c1000006836/line-sir-francis-bacon-powder-skis-2012-p226047.html
That's got all the stats and a good description, but hop on them fast cause we already have already almost sold out of our re-order and from what I hear they are selling out quickly everywhere.



Aug 17 2011 3:31PM
0 0
profile picture
belden...
Posts: 2914 - Karma: 1,273
Alright ill actually probably be getting 2013's. I'm really just looking for a longer elizabeth.
Aug 19 2011 8:29AM
0 0
profile picture
mountainviper
Posts: 1931 - Karma: -3
Well if that's the case......opus?....pretty flexy tips and tails.
Aug 19 2011 2:18PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)