Red Bull Unrailistic | LIVE Broadcast

Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

TGR's new lens

profile picture
TijmenDal
Posts: 4849 - Karma: 1,295
http://www.tetongravity.com/tgrstudios/uncategorized/the-move-to-hdslr-and-creation-of-a-new-lens/

Cool read and awesome what they did.

Those shots are outrageous. Zoomed all the way out I can't even see the black dot that used to be a human!
May 28 2011 6:33PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61107 - Karma: 118,282
Its got some gnarly CA going in some shots...
May 28 2011 6:46PM
0 0
profile picture
[~_~]
Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273
Looks awesome but I'll bet it takes a pretty burly/expensive tripod for it to even be usable.
May 28 2011 7:09PM
0 0
profile picture
CrotchKiller
Posts: 9037 - Karma: 6,940
if you can afford that lens i doubt you have to worry about the price of the tripod
May 28 2011 7:13PM
0 0
profile picture
[~_~]
Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273
How so? They're roughly the same price. Does this mean that if I can afford one 7D, I can afford two 7Ds?
May 28 2011 7:23PM
0 0
profile picture
[~_~]
Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273
A functional tripod for a 768mm focal length will likely run $3,500+

So if a person has $4,500 to spend on a lens, then they automatically have an additional ~80% of that to spend on a tripod? Doesn't make much sense to me, but then gain math was never my forte.
May 28 2011 7:38PM
0 0
profile picture
kalum.ko
Posts: 585 - Karma: 1,672
dearr lorrdd
May 28 2011 9:44PM
0 0
profile picture
S.C
Posts: 3068 - Karma: 2,281
so sick!
May 29 2011 1:30PM
0 0
profile picture
.cam.
Posts: 1852 - Karma: 48
Or English? Hahaha. What you are saying makes sense though.
May 29 2011 4:40PM
0 0
profile picture
TWoods
Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,385
based on the post, the tripod they use with it is generally a 1800 dollar setup - seems like they would need more to prevent shake at that focal length, pretty crazy.
May 29 2011 5:26PM
0 0
profile picture
blatt
Posts: 5584 - Karma: 3,097
That video in their post was not too fluid. But I guess at 768mm nothing is fluid unless motorized. But honestly up to this point I thought TGR shot from a stationary helicopter
May 29 2011 9:57PM
0 0
profile picture
Shredability
Posts: 2756 - Karma: 501


ge sus
May 29 2011 10:30PM
0 0
profile picture
blatt
Posts: 5584 - Karma: 3,097
I just saw the related post. Way more interesting. It's a slider for the backcountry, extremely lightweight

Click for larger image
Click for larger image
May 30 2011 12:54AM
0 0
profile picture
KnobJockey
Posts: 797 - Karma: 37
that looks awesome.
May 30 2011 1:09AM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61107 - Karma: 118,282
I can see that being very finicky, i guess if you made a nice track for it and went slow, itd be decently stable.
May 30 2011 1:13AM
0 0
profile picture
ja.
Posts: 1705 - Karma: 144
use 2 cameras and not drop $30k on 1 lens? ha
May 30 2011 2:56AM
0 0
profile picture
[~_~]
Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273
I've done this before; it's just a Manfrotto magic arm + super clamp.

If you build a channel so that theres no lateral movement, it works quite well, but only for wide shots since telephoto dollies require a much more stable contraption.
May 30 2011 12:57PM
0 0
profile picture
KarmaInitiative
Posts: 2028 - Karma: 174
classic TGR
May 30 2011 5:20PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)