Red Bull Unrailistic | LIVE Broadcast

Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Why?...

profile picture
skichicky3
Posts: 2593 - Karma: 64
Why aren't skis pre-drilled for bindings like snowboards are?
Mar 13 2011 11:27PM
0 0
profile picture
skijunkiedtm
Posts: 9229 - Karma: 61
Because we lack an industry standard.
Mar 13 2011 11:28PM
0 0
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,844
Binding manufacturers insist on having a very wide variety of hole patterns.
Mar 13 2011 11:28PM
0 0
profile picture
skiingute
Posts: 630 - Karma: 15

Bindings don't all have the same screw placement

Mar 13 2011 11:29PM
0 0
profile picture
PJS.
Posts: 11943 - Karma: 895
because ski manufacturers are the demon spawn of satan, seeking to crush any semblance of organization, so that we will all live in completer, hellish anarchy.


wait three years and it will happen
Mar 13 2011 11:30PM
0 0
profile picture
Fluttershy
Posts: 586 - Karma: 763
because lets say you want center mounts and somebody else wants a +3 mount. you have a size 12 boot and they ahve a size 9 boot. you wouldnt be able to mount both of those boots if the holes were pre drilled. they could be too close together and the bindings would rip out of the skis..besides it would look retarted to just see a bunch of holes in your skis
Mar 13 2011 11:30PM
0 0
profile picture
skichicky3
Posts: 2593 - Karma: 64
I just laughed my ass off... you win
Mar 13 2011 11:31PM
0 0
profile picture
corona
Posts: 12752 - Karma: 32,266
the problem I see, even if bindings all had the same hole pattern, is that some people will mount a ski at 0, while another person will mount that same ski at -6. meaning there will have to be like 8 extra holes in the ski. while on a board that wouldn't matter so much, I would imagine on a ski that would make a huge difference in it's ability to not snap.
Mar 13 2011 11:33PM
0 0
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,844
I dont see that happening at all. Maybe if a binding is developed that is instantly superior and takes over the market, but man, you are asking Rossi, Marker, etc to all come together and spend money on something that aids the competition.
Mar 13 2011 11:34PM
0 0
profile picture
j.saaaarela
Posts: 1859 - Karma: 856
K2 has that on a few of their skis. the hellbent and the obsethed i know for sure have a pre-drill option for Marker bindings.

But unless companies made a ridiculous amount of different mounting positions for each model ski, it couldnt happen.
Mar 13 2011 11:38PM
0 0
profile picture
spere
Posts: 6105 - Karma: 248
This.

There's way more variation in mounting locations for skis, and having enough holes to accommodate everyone would greatly impact its strength.
Mar 13 2011 11:39PM
0 0
profile picture
PON3
Posts: 3817 - Karma: 783
because mounting bindings is a precise practice. unlike how snowboarders are used to the same 4 fucking holes no matter how big the feet
Mar 13 2011 11:48PM
0 0
profile picture
Mr.Huck
Posts: 6096 - Karma: 14,893
I know this will be perceived as blasphemy, but perhaps someone may actually not want to have their bindings center mounted, or is the idea to have multiple holes pre-drilled for various bindings at different placements on the ski?  They could call it the Swiss Cheese. 
Mar 14 2011 12:53AM
0 0
profile picture
.brian
Posts: 1710 - Karma: 233
I wonder if something similar to the reactors will ever be attempted again. It'd be dope if it was successful.
Mar 14 2011 1:00AM
0 0
profile picture
ChrisitanKloser
Posts: 5 - Karma: 10
Ski binding have lots of different hole patterns, and people like to put the skis at different places on the ski
Mar 14 2011 2:26AM
0 0
profile picture
snowbombz
Posts: 2456 - Karma: 96
because snowboarding was made by one company that set up all the standards, skiing has been around for thousands of years and to set up a standard would be ridiculous.


also, may i remind you of TELEMARK
Mar 14 2011 3:52AM
0 0
profile picture
hoodratz47
Posts: 11992 - Karma: 9,212
cause your ski tech needs a job.. thats why......



thats why .. if you have skis you cant ask for a wrench at the shop.
Mar 14 2011 5:28AM
0 0
profile picture
ryman
Posts: 113 - Karma: 21
really?

Mar 14 2011 6:01AM
0 0
profile picture
skier_boy26
Posts: 11295 - Karma: 502
you can use inserts if you please

otherwise, it will probably never happen. Mounting locations vary by boot size and desired location, so unless you want a lot of extra metal and clunky shit to make bindings adjustable (e.g. reactor, or most demo bindings), just deal with it.
Mar 14 2011 6:28AM
0 0
profile picture
Lemuel
Posts: 14477 - Karma: 10,515
Yea, probably the best idea anyone has ever had for bindings but the worst quality. So convenient to have 1 pair of bindings for multiple skis. I'm waiting for someone to do it again. They will bank off of it.
Mar 14 2011 10:25AM
0 0
profile picture
undercover_skier
Posts: 1079 - Karma: 160
I think it also is due to the fact that different skiers like to have their own set up for the placement of the bindings, if it's for park, pipe or free riding.
Mar 14 2011 10:31AM
0 0
profile picture
RubberSoul
Posts: 11249 - Karma: 14,642
yeah it was a great idea but they shit the bed so hard with those things. heavy as shit yet still super breakable.. saw multiple pairs of those things blow up on ~20 foot jumps that year, what a joke.. shoulda put a little more R&D into those before releasing them, sort of blew a good chance at a great idea
Mar 14 2011 11:20AM
0 0
profile picture
Scrambles
Posts: 2270 - Karma: 63
haha, my friends exploded from hitting a side booter.
Mar 14 2011 11:37AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)