Quick edit from PC with redrock

eheath · 2010-12-04 03:17:30

What do you guys think? still debating with myself about the vignette of the 20mm... Quick Day at PC from Evan Heath on Vimeo.

.jr

Posts: 5313 - Karma: 356

Karma: 356

Posts: 5313

No Life

Sorry bub, you need new glass. Vignettes too much, and its off center. Its causing overexposure in the middle of your frame too. And what ever other prime you have (1:00), the CA is noticeable. I know its not what you want to hear, but Id say both lenses have to go.

What lenses/versions are they?

15 years ago

0 0

D1X

Posts: 402 - Karma: 16

Karma: 16

Posts: 402

Ridiculous

Sick as usual

15 years ago

0 0

eheath

Posts: 61964 - Karma: 126,855

Karma: 126,855

Posts: 61964

Play Ball

The wide angle is a 20mm vivitar, but even the nikon 20mm 2.8 has a small rear element and will have vignette on a 35mm adapter. The other is a nikkor non-ai 50mm 1.4.

15 years ago

0 0

dozerr

Posts: 4007 - Karma: 404

Karma: 404

Posts: 4007

No Life

el ten eleven and the park cafe. tight!

15 years ago

0 0

TWoods

Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,392

Karma: 8,392

Posts: 10014

Crazy Fool

If it's a full frame lens, it should will project an image that will cover the whole image area.

That vignetting / spotlight combo is terrible though, especially the blueish halo around the burned out area. You need a new wide angle lens for sure.

15 years ago

0 0

LIL_WAT

Posts: 1900 - Karma: 475

Karma: 475

Posts: 1900

Insane

sick. nice vibe plus that switch 10eighty was balllerrrr.

15 years ago

0 0

mnjib

Posts: 5592 - Karma: 363

Karma: 363

Posts: 5592

No Life

That or stop the lens down, typically that helps with Vignetting.(not sure if there are limitations to stopping down with a redrock though)

15 years ago

0 0

IanAvery-Leaf

Posts: 9939 - Karma: 9,498

Karma: 9,498

Posts: 9939

Crazy Fool

15 years ago

0 0

eheath

Posts: 61964 - Karma: 126,855

Karma: 126,855

Posts: 61964

Play Ball

Most of the really bad vignette is in a lower light situation, when its sunny out its not as bad at all.

15 years ago

0 0

Canadianfreeride

Posts: 281 - Karma: 227

Karma: 227

Posts: 281

Loner

I am going to be totally honest as a non-Filmer. I don't like the black on the side, I don't like the shaky camera work (get a damned fluid head). The riding is sick, and there is potential.

15 years ago

0 0

eheath

Posts: 61964 - Karma: 126,855

Karma: 126,855

Posts: 61964

Play Ball

Ha, you think those hand held shots were on a tripod? i had this with a shoulder mount:

can't exactly keep that super steady, its not meant to just fling around like i was doing haha i thought my two actual tripod shots were nice, you didnt seem to notice.

15 years ago

0 0

[~_~]

Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273

Karma: 1,273

Posts: 20239

@th1337

Vintage lenses can suck too.

get a new lens.

15 years ago

0 0

MatRich

Posts: 4789 - Karma: 1,814

Karma: 1,814

Posts: 4789

No Life

the vigneting was a blow. whats the advantage of havving a 35 mm adaptor instead of using a dslr? it seems anoying as fuck to use and comber sum

15 years ago

0 0

eheath

Posts: 61964 - Karma: 126,855

Karma: 126,855

Posts: 61964

Play Ball

Having a real video camera is the advantage. Plus, 35mm adapters actually look good, dslrs are so digital.

15 years ago

0 0

MatRich

Posts: 4789 - Karma: 1,814

Karma: 1,814

Posts: 4789

No Life

Il give you the real video camera advantage but only for two reasons: focus and zoom. I cant dissagree more with the digitalness of dslr's. I think you just want to swim against the current like you tend to do about popular things. you go against things that are popular so that you can be that one guy who is always against something

15 years ago

0 0

[~_~]

Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273

Karma: 1,273

Posts: 20239

@th1337

Zoom is irrelevant when using a 35mm adapter because it is only used to frame shot on the ground glass. Any zooming has to be done with a telephoto, and by that point, your camera is over two feet long, making it extremely impractical.

Also, DSLRs are far superior to 35mm adapters, optically speaking. 35mm adapters stick out like a sore thumb because of their inferior optics, but you won't have artifact problems either. DSLRs look digital because of the processors, not the optics. It's a trade-off really.

Video + 35mm adapter
Pros: no artifacts
Cons: light loss, bad optics, extremely problematic, impractical size/shape

DSLR
Pros: optics, light sensitivity, size, simplicity
Cons: artifacts

15 years ago

0 0

TWoods

Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,392

Karma: 8,392

Posts: 10014

Crazy Fool

DSLR sensors are essentially photo sensors that have been rigged to shoot video. A panasonic HPX sensor shoots better quality video than any DSLR if you are looking at color rendition.

Some people like the DSLR look. If I shot video, I would do so with an HPX and an adapter with nikon glass.

If you can get a copy of Gunnie Season, check out the bonus feature "Sound and Light". You can't get that sort of footage on a DSLR.

*Disclaimer - I'm sure there's ways to get similarly stunning footage out of a DSLR, but in the end, the video cameras, made for video are going to work better in general.

15 years ago

0 0

TWoods

Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,392

Karma: 8,392

Posts: 10014

Crazy Fool

of course, that's assuming you have good glass on the end of your adapter, and a good adapter.

15 years ago

0 0

TWoods

Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,392

Karma: 8,392

Posts: 10014

Crazy Fool

and read what Landis said. I like the look of the adapter better mostly because I hate how most colors render on DSLRs - but he knows a lot more than me about video.

15 years ago

0 0

Canadianfreeride

Posts: 281 - Karma: 227

Karma: 227

Posts: 281

Loner

Just so you know, I am not a hater. Causwell PC and Glide are probably 2 of my favorite edits.

15 years ago

0 0

Ben.

Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683

Karma: 683

Posts: 21463

@th1337

that vig really is obnoxious. the CA on the other lens was noticeable but tolerable if you really cant afford a new one. but that wideangle needs to go asap.

15 years ago

0 0