Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

What photography effect is this?

profile picture
AndrewNZ
Posts: 477 - Karma: 13
Click for larger image

Whenever I see this guys photography he kinda puts a real weird tone on it, is anyone aware of what it is? It kinda makes it look, dull? green? like a photo from 1930's? anyway. Thought someone may know.. Anyone?
Nov 6 2010 11:34PM
0 0
profile picture
benk
Posts: 1342 - Karma: 988
it looks like the vibrance is taken out a tad and added a little split tone, blue shadows and a little yellow highlights
Nov 6 2010 11:40PM
0 0
profile picture
.jr
Posts: 5313 - Karma: 356
Meh.. Looks more like he just balanced for a warmer flash, then added a little green/took out red. I feel like more digital shadows tend to have a cool tint to them on their own.

OP post more photos and well let you know.
Nov 7 2010 12:12AM
0 0
profile picture
AndrewNZ
Posts: 477 - Karma: 13
Click for larger image

Click for larger image

Nov 7 2010 1:02AM
0 0
profile picture
.jr
Posts: 5313 - Karma: 356
I meant different photos, not the same one..
Nov 7 2010 1:07AM
0 0
profile picture
AndrewNZ
Posts: 477 - Karma: 13
wtf haha
Click for larger image

Click for larger image
Sorry, meant those ones
Nov 7 2010 1:19AM
0 0
profile picture
.jr
Posts: 5313 - Karma: 356
Well the vibrance is brought down a whole lot in the original shot, but heres what I think he is doing.
Shoots photo with a warmer (yellow) gelled flash, then pushes midtones to green, and pushes shadows bluer.
The couch shot almost looks like he gelled green, but based off the other two, and the work required to change gels, Id say just edited green in post.

Either way, they are still just a bunch of hipster bar shots. I mean really.. there is a leather jacket in every shot.
Nov 7 2010 1:36AM
0 0
profile picture
gordie.
Posts: 2014 - Karma: 84
dude you even think he's got a gel on there at all? I don't even think the first one had a warm gel on even. It looks all post to me, and you're right, it looks like some hipster baloney.

It just seems to me he's colour correcting to the same weakened colour scheme in each, and kind of ignoring the whole... composition side of photography...
Nov 7 2010 1:04AM
0 0
profile picture
.jr
Posts: 5313 - Karma: 356
No I do actually think he is using a gel but I may be wrong. Look at shot number 2, we all know flashes put out white light, and can overpower/wash out skin tones. Now to get their skin tones close to true, you could either gel, or change your camera WB. If you change to camera WB, it affects all the other colors, so in this case everything in the photo should have a warmer tint, but I'm not seeing that. I also don't think he split toned to get their skin (highlight) to be warmer, if you check the fridge highlight directly to the right of his neck and his shirt, they are pretty much white. Not a yellowish cast you would get from split toning.
Nov 7 2010 1:57AM
0 0
profile picture
benk
Posts: 1342 - Karma: 988
not that i care. but i'll trust you. i do so much in post that it's hard for me to tell any difference
Nov 7 2010 2:00AM
0 0
profile picture
RileySnyderPhoto
Posts: 688 - Karma: 1,451
Looks like it isn't an effect. just looks like a cheap lomo camera
Nov 7 2010 1:15PM
0 0
profile picture
MADDECENT
Posts: 5579 - Karma: 951
That's what I originally thought.

Then again, I know nothing about photography...
Nov 7 2010 1:52PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)