Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
Okay im sure theres been threads on both skis aplenty, but not one in comparison. THe AR6 and T-Hall are both simialr skis such as the Dumont and Suspect. THe AR6 and T-Hall have the same construction, dimensions, and cores. My question what are the flex patterns in each ski specifically.
Note that i'm a midwest rider and am 60% Jib 40% Jump if yourconcerning on giving me a "what ski is best for me" review.
Any Input is noted Cheers!
I was completely thinking that the flexes were the other way around. Usually pro models are alot stiffer than the regulars, and normally tanner loves his stuff really stiff, hence why they buffed up the il moro t for this year. But in this case im thinking the T-Halls are best for me i really want somethingn soft and playful yet can handle its own on jumps.
Origionally i was on they hype train with the afterbangs but ive heard they blow on jumps and tend too rocker out over time, plus a 177 is too small for me, 186cm or 6'1.5''. But i relly wanna try and stick with a cemetrical demensioned ski.
were they freshly out for demos? Because it takes about ~7 good full days of skiing to break in either AR6s or Thalls because of the flex they have, and before that they will feel a lot alike(because they are the exact same shape/materials).
On a side note, Pipe Cleaners have a very different flex IMO(AR6s have much more of a flex point, PCs have a softer seeming flex throughout, that is more smooth) and PCs break in alot faster. After all skis are fully broken in, Thalls will hand-flex and ski the softest, then PCs(to me anyways) hand flex softer than AR6s.
