Red Bull Unrailistic | LIVE Broadcast

Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Atomic punx or line afterbang?

profile picture
*stew
Posts: 488 - Karma: 124

atomic punx or line afterbang? i know i will get one of them but im not really sure which i should go with, any ideas?

Jun 14 2009 10:22PM
0 0
profile picture
special_k10101
Posts: 1498 - Karma: 72
i think the punx is more high performance, but also more expensive.  i've heard of some people really liking the afterbang, but i've also heard people complain that it feels dead.
Jun 14 2009 10:25PM
0 0
profile picture
*stew
Posts: 488 - Karma: 124
anyone know the pros and cons of these skis?
Jun 14 2009 10:39PM
0 0
profile picture
Calb3rt
Posts: 6005 - Karma: 2,202
punx? they are a tried and true ski already where as the afterbang has not really been consumer tested as much and can(not saying it will but CAN) turn into the invader situation all over again.
Jun 14 2009 11:02PM
0 0
profile picture
Evan.Frazee
Posts: 2285 - Karma: -40
definately the punx. Its a sick ski. Afterbangs sound like they are are gunna be soft as hell where punx have a stiffer flex so they will be better all around then the afterbangs would be. What what are you mainly using them for?
Jun 15 2009 12:52AM
0 0
profile picture
*stew
Posts: 488 - Karma: 124
so if i were to use one of these skis pretty much all in the park, the punx would be a better choice? how soft is the punx?
Jun 15 2009 10:48AM
0 0
profile picture
Evan.Frazee
Posts: 2285 - Karma: -40
The punx is like an Ar-6 softness. Not too soft and not too stiff.
Jun 15 2009 2:12PM
0 0
profile picture
T_h_o_m_a_s
Posts: 201 - Karma: 341
Defs the Atomic Punx
Jun 15 2009 10:16PM
0 0
profile picture
EasyEast
Posts: 1983 - Karma: 118
how big are you?
Jun 15 2009 11:54PM
0 0
profile picture
BC.
Posts: 1551 - Karma: 86
atomic punx are comparable to the AR6
the URBAN punx are more comparable to the Anthem's flex pattern
Jun 16 2009 1:34AM
0 0
profile picture
traylortrash
Posts: 1935 - Karma: 2,450
the invader situation?
also, I'm interested to see what the people that have skied the afterbang and DIDNT like it have to say, so far I've just heard a lot "best rail ski ever"....
Jun 16 2009 3:13AM
0 0
profile picture
*stew
Posts: 488 - Karma: 124

same question i have^

im 5 foot 2 or so but i will probably grow over the summer....

Jun 16 2009 10:44AM
0 0
profile picture
EasyEast
Posts: 1983 - Karma: 118

dude if i was you i'd get the punx they are sweet

Jun 16 2009 10:52AM
0 0
profile picture
Daydreaming
Posts: 1686 - Karma: 48
what other differences are there between the punx and urban punx?
Jun 16 2009 2:40PM
0 0
profile picture
pinklittlelamb
Posts: 161 - Karma: 7
Not to thread jack, but I'm curious about the all mountain performance with the atomic Punx. And, just so we're clear, I am talking about the Punx not the Urban Punx. People tend to get confused.
Jun 16 2009 4:26PM
0 0
profile picture
pjbauer
Posts: 2145 - Karma: 480
the punx are stiffer which means better for jumps.. its all depends on what type of skier you are
Jun 16 2009 4:46PM
0 0
profile picture
jason...
Posts: 9006 - Karma: 780
I have punx. I love them. Super solid ski and really good durability. I don't know much about the afterbangs but line skis tend to not be so great durability wise from my experiences.
Jun 16 2009 4:55PM
0 0
profile picture
griffin.paisley
Posts: 1520 - Karma: 38
bumppp
Jun 16 2009 7:40PM
0 0
profile picture
*stew
Posts: 488 - Karma: 124
^
Jun 17 2009 11:07AM
0 0
profile picture
R-S
Posts: 26 - Karma: 10
I rode afterbangs at a demo, good for rails, but i found them to be unstable and shakey on jumps, and i think they are to soft for jumps, i sketched out a couple times on spins. But they are a good rail ski if you only hit rails, not so great when it comes to higher speeds and jumps
Jun 17 2009 12:27PM
0 0
profile picture
pinklittlelamb
Posts: 161 - Karma: 7
From my understanding, the atomic punx for 2010 are no longer symmetrical? Will this improve overall all-mountain capability?
Jun 17 2009 4:06PM
0 0
profile picture
*stew
Posts: 488 - Karma: 124
the atomic part of the NSTV SIA video the guy said that the punx are unchanged except for the top sheet
Jun 21 2009 11:49PM
0 0
profile picture
blackoutbill
Posts: 2918 - Karma: 282
The durability isn't really an issue anymore. I skied my 07/08 invaders super hard all season and they held up well. It seems like quality control at Line put the afterbang through hell and back so I'm not really doubting the durability but we'll see

Jun 22 2009 12:17AM
0 0
profile picture
jibbinc
Posts: 804 - Karma: 33
im stoked for my bangs.
Jun 22 2009 4:05AM
0 0
profile picture
griffin.paisley
Posts: 1520 - Karma: 38
that quote was unnecessary
Jun 22 2009 8:05PM
0 0
profile picture
*stew
Posts: 488 - Karma: 124
so i ski probably 50% rails 50% jumps and from what i have heard i think im going with the punxs, any idea for bindings?
Jun 26 2009 1:52AM
0 0
profile picture
griffin.paisley
Posts: 1520 - Karma: 38
ya so the punx would  probably be best, i would go with the a salomon or marker binding.
Jun 27 2009 9:24PM
0 0
profile picture
*stew
Posts: 488 - Karma: 124
ok thanks
Jul 1 2009 10:16PM
0 0
profile picture
potatoes.
Posts: 479 - Karma: 68
i skied the bangs for two weeks last season on a shop demo. i really enjoyed it. rails, jumps ect. others didn't i did. depends how you ski. everyone has a different feel and style. it'll be interesting to see how everyone else see the afterbang. picked a pair up last week, am stoked. hope you find your ski. word.
Jul 4 2009 12:22AM
0 0
profile picture
THEDICKBUTCHER
Posts: 3067 - Karma: 673
i could be wrong or just confused but i heard sooo many ppl say that the afterbang is the new invader which is NOT true, there was a testing day at my mtn i didint get to test cuz i didint have a parent but i did see and felt the afterbangs i was surprised to how stiff they were (im a chick so maybe a lil lighter fo the guys) they are not being replaced from the invaders its jsut a test ski the new "invaders" have some other name (and aweful graphics in my opinion) i was told by the line dude that was there at the time.
Jul 4 2009 2:08AM
0 0
profile picture
Lemuel
Posts: 14477 - Karma: 10,515
the mastermind is replacing the invader.  The graphics are very similar to the 07 invaders.  I don't know why people think the Afterbang is replacing the Invader though.
Jul 4 2009 9:22AM
0 0
profile picture
Newschool_Pope
Posts: 2473 - Karma: 267
try the jesters or barons from marker. youll have a really direct feel to the si and they are low weight.
the punx are an awesome ski and more years have gone into development of the skis, whereas the afterbangs are completely new and were not consumer tested yet. maybe just wait for winter and demo both of them.

peace
Jul 5 2009 8:07AM
0 0
profile picture
-james-
Posts: 192 - Karma: 19
baron is a touring binding maybe stay away from them seeming i dont think ull be touring much on them
Jul 5 2009 8:20AM
0 0
profile picture
Newschool_Pope
Posts: 2473 - Karma: 267
true, sorry my bad, im confused with all the new bindings from marker and with their different din ranges.
stick with the jester.
peace
Jul 5 2009 12:29PM
0 0
profile picture
*stew
Posts: 488 - Karma: 124

thanks

Jul 9 2009 9:12PM
0 0
profile picture
bananas
Posts: 1419 - Karma: 164
why would you even compare? line fo sho
Aug 25 2009 11:13PM
0 0
profile picture
yeahitsdave
Posts: 1315 - Karma: 10

because its a cheaper, symmetrical jib ski. it effectively replaces the invader in category, albeit in a completely different performance level and construction. definitely stiffer than a lot of people think, its still soft, but no where near invader soft. they actually almost feel as stiff as chronics do once they break in.

mastermind is completely new really, its price point so it replaces the invader in that aspect, and its retarded soft, so that too, but its directional and narrow (softer flexing silencer, really) so different as well

Aug 25 2009 11:25PM
0 0
profile picture
iFail
Posts: 2066 - Karma: 65

this thread is from a month and a half ago smart guy.  And way to be a total follower, dumbass.  Maby he wanted a comparison because he doesn't know how they will compare to each other?  idk, that's usually why people want a comparison.

Oh and my vote WOULD BE Punx...not that it matters because this is an old thread.  good job

Aug 25 2009 11:28PM
0 0
profile picture
50in07
Posts: 3070 - Karma: 1,471
Afterbang!!!
Aug 25 2009 11:59PM
0 0
profile picture
*stew
Posts: 488 - Karma: 124
haha thanks... im probably gona get the punxs
Aug 26 2009 4:13AM
0 0
profile picture
scottie617
Posts: 281 - Karma: 10
but are the punx heavy though
Aug 26 2009 11:04AM
0 0
profile picture
Evan.Frazee
Posts: 2285 - Karma: -40
Mine are just as light as invaders.
Aug 26 2009 1:59PM
0 0
profile picture
scottie617
Posts: 281 - Karma: 10

i never held a line invader so i wouldnt know

how many pounds do you think it is

Aug 26 2009 2:07PM
0 0
profile picture
*stew
Posts: 488 - Karma: 124
ok so i have a choice of marker or salomon bindings any ideas about which i should go with, anything helps(i think i weight between 120 and 130)
thanks
Aug 26 2009 10:47PM
0 0
profile picture
Daydreaming
Posts: 1686 - Karma: 48
you will definitely be fine with either the sth 12s or griffins.  i think the sth 12s are lighter but im not sure. honestly just see what you can get a better deal on.
Aug 27 2009 12:00AM
0 0
profile picture
*stew
Posts: 488 - Karma: 124
i can get a good deal on both so price isnt a big issue
Aug 27 2009 12:04AM
0 0
profile picture
Daydreaming
Posts: 1686 - Karma: 48
then its 100% preference!  whatever you think looks cooler i guess
Aug 27 2009 12:16AM
0 0
profile picture
Ooiii
Posts: 61 - Karma: 11
get the line afterbangs?
Oct 1 2009 1:21PM
0 0
profile picture
KennyC
Posts: 1922 - Karma: 46
ya dont get the barons its a touring binding so... get griffons or jesters.
Nov 8 2009 5:10PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)