TGP Vol. 7 | NS Originals S2E03 | Andreas Hatveit, Benedik Oye & Crew

Member of the Month

JalmarKalmar
April, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Jump design (angles and what not)

profile picture
wiener
Posts: 2247 - Karma: 63
just wondering if anyone here knows where i can get some specs on jump building? I am doing a design project for university and i need to get some actual specs. any help would be awesome.

i basically need
-jump angles
-landing angles

rough and dirty works for me
Mar 17 2009 3:26PM
0 0
profile picture
DBeck
Posts: 1275 - Karma: 63
rough and dirty works for me, hehe
Mar 17 2009 3:33PM
0 0
profile picture
IanAvery-Leaf
Posts: 9926 - Karma: 9,344
wiener
Mar 17 2009 5:01PM
0 0
profile picture
Malcolm
Posts: 15949 - Karma: 9,432
make them exactly like smuggs. lol just kidding
Mar 17 2009 5:14PM
0 0
profile picture
Sir_SkrillALot
Posts: 1736 - Karma: 668
take off should be a 45 degree angle and giant deck to flat. Always flat.
Mar 17 2009 5:26PM
0 0
profile picture
aoe
Posts: 2947 - Karma: 51
I'm currently looking at the November 1999 issue of Powder magazine. In that issue there's an article called Inversion and it's about Superpark 1. There's a page on all of the jumps at Superpark 1 including the lengths and angles of all of the jumps. I'll scan it now and post it asap.
Mar 17 2009 5:27PM
0 0
profile picture
MANDER
Posts: 4017 - Karma: 2,038
what an awesome friend. i wish everyone was this helpful to people
Mar 17 2009 5:30PM
0 0
profile picture
Gnarwall
Posts: 1180 - Karma: 50
Holy shit, did someone actually offer to help someone else on newschoolers??? I'm scared, really fucking scared.

Mar 17 2009 5:34PM
0 0
profile picture
Commonwealth
Posts: 3729 - Karma: 11
According to my subtle observations, he's been a member since BEFORE all the douchebag 13-year-olds started posting.
Mar 17 2009 5:39PM
0 0
profile picture
Malcolm
Posts: 15949 - Karma: 9,432
well i didnt actually know the answer, so i replied something useless to bump up the thread thus being helpful to people. yeaaaaah and im doing it again
Mar 17 2009 5:40PM
0 0
profile picture
Rudy.
Posts: 441 - Karma: 24
hahaha
Mar 17 2009 6:05PM
0 0
profile picture
inactive
Posts: 4772 - Karma: 97
dude NS comes through every once and a while


i have sent kids essays before, and we always sway each others contests
Mar 17 2009 6:23PM
0 0
profile picture
aoe
Posts: 2947 - Karma: 51
What you're looking for is on page 3. You'll notice that the landings are usually a few degrees more then the takeoff, and the bigger the gap, the more the landing is angled. I'll post the whole article because it is a good read, especially for anyone who has  got into skiing in the last few years. This is our roots!



Click for larger image

Click for larger image

Click for larger image


Click for larger image

Click for larger image



Click for larger image



Click for larger image

Click for larger image
Click for larger image
Mar 17 2009 6:31PM
0 0
profile picture
Caveman.
Posts: 9067 - Karma: 330
haha I love the jump names.
Mar 17 2009 7:00PM
0 0
profile picture
.SimonB.
Posts: 1959 - Karma: 713
1080s all up in yo face. good find.
Mar 17 2009 7:45PM
0 0
profile picture
nickmiles
Posts: 1070 - Karma: 844
try and print out a mammoth jump and just use a protractor figure it out. shits perfect.
Mar 17 2009 7:50PM
0 0
profile picture
bob_dole
Posts: 4076 - Karma: 1,579
haha oh man! that is a sick article you have there!
Mar 17 2009 8:14PM
0 0
profile picture
jblaski
Posts: 5561 - Karma: 1,027
my threads
Mar 17 2009 10:04PM
0 0
profile picture
Mrvic.
Posts: 1033 - Karma: 154
Click for larger image
https://www.newschoolers.com/web/content/pictures/id/167526/
Mar 18 2009 11:41AM
0 0
profile picture
spotter487
Posts: 462 - Karma: 12
^^^^wow that is pretty legit. did you go to an engineering school to get such precision? lol.

damn aoe came thru for the op +k
Mar 18 2009 3:16PM
0 0
profile picture
Moostafa
Posts: 232 - Karma: 15
that is some crafty shit man hahaha
Mar 18 2009 4:08PM
0 0
profile picture
CFD
Posts: 1009 - Karma: 197
Fck yeah dude i got so stoked on that article! I'm gonna go watch the realm now
Mar 18 2009 8:14PM
0 0
profile picture
switchieski
Posts: 575 - Karma: 15
nothing better than plummeting 50 ft in the air and slamming a nice icy deck, gotta love that
Mar 18 2009 9:15PM
0 0
profile picture
Capurnicus
Posts: 9947 - Karma: 1,886
thanks for posting that article, it was really sick
Mar 18 2009 9:21PM
0 0
profile picture
Sun_Ra
Posts: 983 - Karma: 279
Holy shit !
That article was rediculous.
Philou Poirier throwing a sw backflip on a 74 footer, I would still be impressed to see that trick. Also the 900 he threw in the 12 foot pipe is impressive. All the setup were guetto and sick tricks were thrown.
Even 10 years after, the last sentence of page 1 is still so true.
Mar 19 2009 12:00AM
0 0
profile picture
Mrvic.
Posts: 1033 - Karma: 154
Mar 19 2009 12:13AM
0 0
profile picture
HeartBeatFaster
Posts: 723 - Karma: 26
That article was sweet. They need to republish that one.

 As a general rule of thumb, the park I work at sets the landing at the same angle as the take off. However the bigger the jump gets, the longer the landing needs to be. Sometimes we go a little steeper but the length of the landing is as important as the slope.
Mar 19 2009 12:55AM
0 0
profile picture
WILLFRO07
Posts: 392 - Karma: 15
as a general rule, when an object is thrown at an angle, it lands about on the same angle. ie: if you have a jump thats a 45 degree take off, and in a perfect atmosphere, if you make the landing 45 as well, the landing should be perfect providing the length is right. google projectile motion and you can figure out how to make a perfect jump, or at least on paper.
but for all intensive purposes, have the take off and landing be about the same, and if anything make the landing a little steeper and make it long.

hope that helps.
Mar 19 2009 1:07AM
0 0
profile picture
family_vacation
Posts: 6200 - Karma: 7,842
My mountain(snoqualmie) go sued for lie 8 million dollars because a person who overshot a jump said the angles were incorrect.
Mar 19 2009 1:23AM
0 0
profile picture
SnowRidgeParks
Posts: 2146 - Karma: 88

My threads so I can check out that article when I'm sober...

Oh, and physics classes work wonders for jump building. Everything depends on pitch and speed, speed is key.

Mar 19 2009 2:26AM
0 0
profile picture
cj
Posts: 4032 - Karma: 469
Totally had that issue! I'm choked I threw all my old issues out over the years. That flat 3 (lincon) japan sequence by Douglas is bangin. So sick even by today's standards...

I vote you scan all your old mags to give the ns members of today a little history lesson (and to give us ol timers a little something to reminisce about).

Quality post!
Mar 19 2009 2:34AM
0 0
profile picture
Bright_Nation
Posts: 400 - Karma: 12
my threads, great read
Mar 19 2009 2:45AM
0 0
profile picture
Silence
Posts: 16030 - Karma: 149
Nice one!
Mar 19 2009 4:05AM
0 0
profile picture
Silence
Posts: 16030 - Karma: 149
I believe Mr Bishop knows a thing or 2 about jump building
Mar 19 2009 4:05AM
0 0
profile picture
Sean_Is_God
Posts: 10 - Karma: 48

Have a look at this document, hope you find something of use in it:

http://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/E-project/Available/E-project-043007-014523/unrestricted/TerrainParkIQP.pdf
Mar 19 2009 4:45AM
0 0
profile picture
Sean_Is_God
Posts: 10 - Karma: 48
Hmmm, link didn't work.

Oh well, it was a document entitled "THE DEVELOPMENT & SOCIETAL IMPACTS OF A SPEED MODEL FOR TERRAIN PARK JUMPS"....someones university thesis. If you want me to send you a a .pdf copy send me a message with your email and I'll forward it.

Try the link one last time:

http://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/E-project/Available/E-project-043007-014523/unrestricted/TerrainParkIQP.pdf
Mar 19 2009 4:50AM
0 0
profile picture
CFD
Posts: 1009 - Karma: 197
If you copy and paste the link it works.

Interesting paper. Do you know the guy that wrote it? I'd love to discuss some of it with him..

I'm looking at the jump angles on p.55, the angles seem to be between 80 and 115.. Makes no sense to me, any idea what the units are for this?
Mar 19 2009 9:03AM
0 0
profile picture
Blurst
Posts: 13577 - Karma: 10,168

The list of superpark skiers is a heros list. All of the best most original skiers out there

Mar 19 2009 9:09AM
0 0
profile picture
Twig
Posts: 6336 - Karma: 57,097
I would imagine just from the figures that it is a percentage slope, i.e 80% slope 80cm up for every meter forward etc. So 100 would = 45 degrees. But thats just a guess.
Mar 19 2009 9:12AM
0 0
profile picture
Sean_Is_God
Posts: 10 - Karma: 48
No I don't know the guy who wrote it, I just came across it randomly Googling stuff. Sorry I can be of much more help. Any references in the paper might be work looking up though?
Mar 19 2009 12:11PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)