Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Prop 8 did not pass....

profile picture
Arabian.
Posts: 9632 - Karma: 54

Fucking Conservafags once again stymie social progress with help of everyone's favorite book: The Bible. I am so, so, so, sad for all the gays living in california who have to deal with this shit for another 4 years. I guess it didn't help that voting YES meant banning gay marriage and NO meant you were for it. Strange reverse psychology.

Next election, vote NO on prop 8.

Nov 5 2008 3:34PM
0 0
profile picture
coolhandluke
Posts: 4465 - Karma: 153
the fact that the majority of african-americans in exit polls stating they voted against prop 8 has no little bit of irony to you?

i'm glad this is currently a state issue, and not a federal issue.  let the individual state decide what their definition of marriage is.  since it is fairly obvious that we have different ideals throughout the country.  san francisco = pro homo.  bible belt states = no homo.  although, i wonder how the state-specific definition of marriage would translate to your 1040 tax forms?
Nov 6 2008 4:50PM
0 0
profile picture
psychkub
Posts: 1788 - Karma: 16
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA,

adam and eve is history eh?

What, do you think the earth is flat too?
Nov 6 2008 4:54PM
0 0
profile picture
coolhandluke
Posts: 4465 - Karma: 153
chapter one of some people's "history book",  yes.  to most logical minds, no.

excuse me for being uneducated, but are there any countries which extend full equal and legal marriage rights to both homo and hetero couples?
Nov 6 2008 5:01PM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
holy fuck..... your an idiot
Nov 6 2008 8:38PM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
yes they are a minority. no they didnt CHOOSE to be gay.


we dont have to accept anything?
tell you what. i dont accept black people anymore, they should be my slave. same concept, just as wrong.
Nov 6 2008 8:40PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,141
Canada, Norway, South Africa, Spain, and the Netherlands... in addition to Massachusetts and Conneticut.
Nov 6 2008 8:41PM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
except if im not mistaken, arent those rights in Mass and Connecticut voided when they cross the border into another state?
Nov 6 2008 8:43PM
0 0
profile picture
nickrdwd
Posts: 250 - Karma: 10

im pretty sure being gay is just the way you are, its a trait your born with so no they dont have that luxury of choice. 

and for people saying that having a seperate but equal name isnt segregation take this example from my history homework. The Louisiana act stated that "all railway companies were to provide equal but seperate acommodations for white and black races".  That sounds alot like what your saying and a hell of a lot like segregation. "seperate but equal" accomodations is segregation/

Nov 6 2008 8:51PM
0 0
profile picture
coolhandluke
Posts: 4465 - Karma: 153
and how does the state-specific legislation apply to federal income filing status?
Nov 6 2008 8:54PM
0 0
profile picture
Reptar.
Posts: 1509 - Karma: 34
Ok, no one seemed to read my last post. But no one even noticed that the title of this thread is an Epic Fail.

Nov 6 2008 9:03PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,141
For most of these sorts of purposes a common-law spouse is treated the same as an actual spouse. So if gay partners can be CL spouses, there should be little difference in that arena.
Nov 6 2008 9:03PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)