Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

J.O. Pro how is it

profile picture
SilkyJohnson
Posts: 673 - Karma: 43

is it strictly park or is it good for groomers and moguls because of how narrow it is. Also what about rails does it base hold up well. Just let me know what you guys know about this ski

May 16 2008 11:36AM
0 0
profile picture
Franny
Posts: 3980 - Karma: 77
I would say it more for jumps cuz the waist is dam skinny fro rail but they do hold up on them.
May 16 2008 12:30PM
0 0
profile picture
poofartpee
Posts: 7436 - Karma: 1,537
funny how people like wider skis for jumps...

but yeah its a great ski on the groomers and moguls...as long as ur using them on hard pack they rip the shit out of it
May 16 2008 10:21PM
0 0
profile picture
sick-as-aids
Posts: 3453 - Karma: 1,007

a great ski, look sick 2

May 17 2008 2:01AM
0 0
profile picture
ValPow
Posts: 1049 - Karma: 10
it may be a good ski, even a great ski but it looks cheap to me. This years model writes sex tips in lads mags like fhm etc.

Therefore to put a picture of a cheap slag on your skis makes them look cheap and nasty in my opinion
May 17 2008 8:50AM
0 0
profile picture
Caveman.
Posts: 9067 - Karma: 330
thats funny logic, i thought most people prefered skinnier skis for rails..
May 17 2008 10:17PM
0 0
profile picture
Silence
Posts: 16030 - Karma: 149
Some really conflicting points of view in this thread!

My thoughts

-They have excellent construction, really durable like all mid-top end HEAD skis.
-Fairly stiff - great to use out of the park.
-Even with the narrower waist, the added stiffness would probably offset the stability on landings
-Dimensions make for a great jib ski
-Super light + Centremount - low swingweight
May 17 2008 11:56PM
0 0
profile picture
SilkyJohnson
Posts: 673 - Karma: 43
sounds like a solid ski, just how durable is it
May 18 2008 1:54PM
0 0
profile picture
Caveman.
Posts: 9067 - Karma: 330
good summary
May 18 2008 2:12PM
0 0
profile picture
SilkyJohnson
Posts: 673 - Karma: 43
any more input...bump
May 19 2008 4:07PM
0 0
profile picture
t_rob
Posts: 6433 - Karma: 11,458
Click for larger image

May 19 2008 6:00PM
0 0
profile picture
Valind
Posts: 4358 - Karma: 17
i have the 09 jo's....i love them..i have them center mounted with 09 mojo15's.  There are sick an groomers, park and jumps..SUCK in crud and powder( i know there only 77 under foot) but I took them out last saturday (it snowed almost a foot, wet snow though) and they were hard to control and turn.  ( once again, I know there not pow skis) but for groomers, park and jumps there awesome.  I thought they would be different for landing, there not bad at all..real stable on the landing...
May 19 2008 7:59PM
0 0
profile picture
Ski_Midwest
Posts: 551 - Karma: 10
amazing ski.  They held up awesome this season for how much hell i put them through.
May 19 2008 11:09PM
0 0
profile picture
Franny
Posts: 3980 - Karma: 77
It depends on personal preference but overall i dont like it cuz it's too skinny. 83mm is what i like
May 19 2008 11:26PM
0 0
profile picture
SilkyJohnson
Posts: 673 - Karma: 43
i think it is the right ski for me b/c i am looking for a stiff ski in the park and a good groomer ski
May 20 2008 12:13PM
0 0
profile picture
C-Burg
Posts: 4729 - Karma: 130
i bought some, seems like a sick ski. Love the graphics too
May 20 2008 7:53PM
0 0
profile picture
Valind
Posts: 4358 - Karma: 17

There stiff, but not real stiff....Have you ever skied the k2 seth/  the seth is sfiffer than the jo's

May 20 2008 8:50PM
0 0
profile picture
C-Burg
Posts: 4729 - Karma: 130
that's why i got this years
May 20 2008 9:07PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)