Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Watch out now, Nordica Zero's taking over....
Posts: 2594
-
Karma: 20
Sickest ski this year, by far. no ski has more pop, a quicker or better turn shape, or a lighter feel as this one. anyone else second this motion?
Posts: 6974
-
Karma: 79
From what I've heard they sound like sick skis, a symmetrical pow ski. But they won't sell well, you can say that you don't care about the graphics, but the average skier will not buy them because they're so god damn ugly.
Posts: 2594
-
Karma: 20
very very true. the graphics are terrible, but god damn do they ski well.
Posts: 10014
-
Karma: 8,385
Honestly. I doubt it. but i'll wait to judge until i ski it.
Posts: 2180
-
Karma: 187
my cousin has some new nordicas this year and he loves em, but yeah they are definetly some of the ugliest skis ive ever seen
Posts: 1315
-
Karma: 10
where/when did u try them? i wanna get my hands on a pair, they look sexy
Posts: 2497
-
Karma: 17
pics? i wanna see how ugly. ha
Posts: 1315
-
Karma: 10
https://newschoolers.com/web/content/pagetemplate/name/sia08/page/sia08_nordica/
second pic down
Posts: 1315
-
Karma: 10
oh, and they are like 130-104-130 with zero chamber. the really interest me, i love symmertrical sidecut and flex, so that in a bc jib ski? more people should be talking about these skis, i feel like
Posts: 2542
-
Karma: 298
how do these skis have a lot of pop if they have no camber...?
Posts: 18426
-
Karma: 4,888
I dont really see the point of a pow ski this skinny with absolutely no camber...
Posts: 4801
-
Karma: 869
i didn't think they were a pow ski?
Posts: 5536
-
Karma: -1
It says they are 122-84-112?
Anyone got the actual dimensions?
And I don't think they are ugly at all, they're a little plain compared to the rest of the lineup, and compared to a lot of skis we're seeing these days, but not ugly by any means.
Posts: 2538
-
Karma: 26
yeah i was just going to say that
Posts: 4801
-
Karma: 869
I thought they were 84 under foot and compared to some of Nordicas other poop graphics they're not half bad
Posts: 1315
-
Karma: 10
Posts: 11349
-
Karma: 2,333
Posts: 426
-
Karma: 12
Posts: 1240
-
Karma: 17
Posts: 1315
-
Karma: 10
has anyone skied them? besides the guy that created teh thread, because thats kinda a grabage review
Posts: 1030
-
Karma: 11
That graphic is really lame
They have those stickers you can make online and then put on your skis
All times are Eastern (-4)
