Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
What ski size., I need some input please.
Posts: 4358
-
Karma: 17
So I have the Seth's 179 at the moment, I am 5 8 about 150. I live in Colorado. Should I stay with the 179 or go to a 169. I like to mount at +3 cause I dont do a lot of park. Would 169 be too small?
Thanks
Posts: 2904
-
Karma: 92
This is NS dude.
YOU ALWAYS GO WITH THE BIGGER SKI NO MATTER WHAT!
Posts: 10710
-
Karma: 7,380
Posts: 57801
-
Karma: 83,350
Posts: 54
-
Karma: 10
Posts: 16030
-
Karma: 127
you would get pissed off with 169
Posts: 4358
-
Karma: 17
Posts: 3469
-
Karma: 41
bigger skis = bigger penis
Posts: 2333
-
Karma: 246
Posts: 10395
-
Karma: 9,015
Posts: 8407
-
Karma: 24
im about the same specs but on 171z. since its a fat ski, i think youre right on.
Posts: 10636
-
Karma: 348
ok well since everyone kinda answered his question ima do a bit of thread jacking, im 5' 8" and i ski 161's, too short?
Posts: 4358
-
Karma: 17
Posts: 949
-
Karma: 382
Posts: 7821
-
Karma: 3,215
I guess I'll be the only guy who says 169.
I am 5'6'' and was on 175 trouble makers, center mounted. I broke those
and center mounted a pair of 169 fujatives and have a ton more fun with
them. The ski is much easier to throw around in the park and I can
ollie much higher. I have no problems with washing out on landings or
see any advantage of having a slightly bigger ski. I just bought a pair
of 175 ARVs for all mountain and I think this will be plenty of ski.
Then again, if you are in CO and don't ski a lot of park. Its not like you'll be trying to toss them around too much.
You're only 5'8'', I don't think you need a 179 length.
Posts: 3469
-
Karma: 41
yeah you should be on about a 170
Posts: 4221
-
Karma: 13
yea you would definitly overpower them in a 169
All times are Eastern (-5)
