Member of the Month

JalmarKalmar
April, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Amarda ant pro model

profile picture
richienz
Posts: 10 - Karma: 10
Does any one know what the dimensions of the ant pro model are for this year. I wanted to get the 4frnt msp 190's but i really think the graphics dept have had a shocker this year so i'm being shallow and looking at some other skis if they are similar dimensions and feel etc, Cheers
Oct 3 2005 7:15AM
0 0
profile picture
dandoy
Posts: 5522 - Karma: 13
how tall are you, how much do you weigh, what is your skiing ability and are you gonna use them for pure pow?
Oct 3 2005 8:09AM
0 0
profile picture
richienz
Posts: 10 - Karma: 10
Hey, i'm 193cm and weigh 87kg sorry not sure what this is in pounds. Yeah mostly pow/crud. Do you think that these could be too wide and jp/julians might be a better option if not in the super fluffy stuff so offen. I would like a reasonable stiff ski so it hold up when i'm giving it.cheers
Oct 3 2005 8:38AM
0 0
profile picture
dandoy
Posts: 5522 - Karma: 13
Umm don't take just my word for it but I don't think you can go wrong with either of them...
Oct 3 2005 8:46AM
0 0
profile picture
Vicious
Posts: 3862 - Karma: 140
ANTs will be a waaaay different ski than the MSP. The ANTs are basically the burliest twin ever made.
Oct 3 2005 11:25AM
0 0
profile picture
joshbryant
Posts: 2133 - Karma: 228
ANT's are 133-106-123 in a 191 cm only.
Oct 3 2005 12:44PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,141
The width difference between the ANT and JPvsJulien is negligible, 3mm. The thing you're going to want to decide is how stiff you want your skis. You're pretty heavy, but the ANTs are a beefy stick. Different ski than the MSP for sure.
Oct 3 2005 12:47PM
0 0
profile picture
johanblaze
Posts: 4987 - Karma: 343
it's a giant!
Oct 3 2005 12:48PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,141
Hahaha, that's what I was thinking... 193, that's 6'4, 6'5 or so?
Oct 3 2005 12:57PM
0 0
profile picture
thecarguy
Posts: 99 - Karma: 10
87 kg is roughly 192 pounds. You don't need me to tell you that you are a big guy. I think the JP vs Julien will wash out too much....also I think if you ski crud, the Juliens will get a little scary.

The ANTs would be a good ski for somebody your size, but you will probably need to train. These planks are s-t-i-f-f.

As far as being the burliest twin ever...they're close...but the Head Supermojo might top them. ANTs also have minimal sidecut. Minimal sidecut + no flex = a ski that isn't willing to turn. These sticks are all about pointing it and given 'er.

That said....I really want some too....and the graphics are sick.
Oct 3 2005 1:19PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,141
^I'm actually heavier on that and on Jp vs. Juliens, and orig pistols actually... soft skis, and they're fine, they do what they're made to do. But I agree, in crud a stiffer plank would be better.
Oct 3 2005 1:25PM
0 0
profile picture
Vicious
Posts: 3862 - Karma: 140
Agreed although I definitely don't need them.
Oct 3 2005 1:30PM
0 0
profile picture
sid-vicious
Posts: 136 - Karma: 22
Now for some pics other than the website cartoon photo.
Oct 3 2005 1:42PM
0 0
profile picture
Vicious
Posts: 3862 - Karma: 140
They are way sicker in person...that's for certain.
Oct 3 2005 1:43PM
0 0
profile picture
johanblaze
Posts: 4987 - Karma: 343
luke couldn't handle those beasts.
Oct 3 2005 1:58PM
0 0
profile picture
Vicious
Posts: 3862 - Karma: 140
WHAT?!?!?! hah
Oct 3 2005 1:59PM
0 0
profile picture
johanblaze
Posts: 4987 - Karma: 343
oh... just kidding luke.
Oct 3 2005 2:00PM
0 0
profile picture
Vicious
Posts: 3862 - Karma: 140
Dickwad.
Oct 3 2005 2:02PM
0 0
profile picture
johanblaze
Posts: 4987 - Karma: 343
luke
Oct 3 2005 2:03PM
0 0
profile picture
johanblaze
Posts: 4987 - Karma: 343
excuse me, that was a typo.

i meant so say that luke
Oct 3 2005 2:14PM
0 0
profile picture
johanblaze
Posts: 4987 - Karma: 343
what the fuck... i think newschoolers is preventing me from revealing lukes true sexuality.
Oct 3 2005 2:15PM
0 0
profile picture
shawnm1260
Posts: 3219 - Karma: 66
the 190 vct is just as burly as the ant.... dont doubt it.
Oct 3 2005 2:18PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,141
Uhhhh... I doubt it. Aren't they fairly soft?
Oct 3 2005 2:32PM
0 0
profile picture
Vicious
Posts: 3862 - Karma: 140
I wouldn't call them soft, but they aren't quite as stiff as the ANT.

The 190 VCT is a sick f'ing ski though.
Oct 3 2005 2:38PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,141
Cool. I was under the impression they were meant to be on the soft side, like a big urban jib stick. But I have not seen any of the 06 4frnts in person as yet.
Oct 3 2005 2:39PM
0 0
profile picture
Kev
Posts: 7411 - Karma: 35
Isn;t the 190 VCT alot different then the 182? the 190 is noticebly stiffer and thicker...
Oct 3 2005 3:07PM
0 0
profile picture
Vicious
Posts: 3862 - Karma: 140
Yes, as far as I know.
Oct 3 2005 3:10PM
0 0
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,141
Wow... urban? I'm an idiot. I meant big mountain. hahaha.
Oct 3 2005 3:22PM
0 0
profile picture
Vicious
Posts: 3862 - Karma: 140
I didn't even realize you wrote that, but I knew what you meant.
Oct 3 2005 3:35PM
0 0
profile picture
thecarguy
Posts: 99 - Karma: 10
The VCTs have sick graphics, they are made for throwing skins on them, they are fairly stiff....but it's hard to find them under 775 dollars.

Which is a lot more than the ANTs
Oct 3 2005 5:59PM
0 0
profile picture
Vicious
Posts: 3862 - Karma: 140
That is a VERY good point. Looking at the Vinnie's last week I was stoked until I saw the price tag.

I'll be impressed if I see anyone actually riding them this year (by anyone I mean anyone who actually paid full price for them).
Oct 3 2005 6:03PM
0 0
profile picture
powfoka
Posts: 2709 - Karma: 160
look at the surface 190 fat a litte but more sidecut and the perfect flex for what you gonna be doin!
Oct 3 2005 7:51PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)