Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Line's holes

profile picture
DietCoke
Posts: 1317 - Karma: 7
Line has really stepped it up with the idea used on the elizabeth to use 2 sets of holes, 1 for true center mount, and one with a further back stance for pow.

this is something line should start doing to all its skis, seeing how its the only reason i didnt want to buy the reactors (other then durability). as long as the pow stance isnt too far back, so that its still possible to ride all mtn and huck shit a little here and there, starting asap line should do this to all their skis


-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_

If hate were people, I'd be China.
Jul 28 2005 9:30AM
0 0
profile picture
LC.
Posts: 5952 - Karma: 2,423
Yeah, definitely. I emailed them last year saying two sets of holes would be a good idea and they said they'd be doing it on this year's skis but it looks like it's just on the prophets.

You could install two sets of helicoils on any ski and be able to change arond the mountain point. It would cost about $100 though and I'm not sure if an unused helicoil would seal out water. The flex and stength of the ski might be messed up though depending on where the unused set is. I'm going to ask some techs this winter if it would be a feasible idea if I could get it done cheap or free. Surely someone has thought of it before though.

Jul 28 2005 10:02AM
0 0
profile picture
MagSeven
Posts: 1000 - Karma: 412
The '6 pack' system is on Prophet 130s and 100s, Elizabeths and Mothership Flites.

Helicoils may work, although a larger hole would probably mess with the ski, as its a couple of pretty big chunks out the core. And yeah, as you say, unless it was done super super cleanly, it'd probably let moisture.



SoulX newschool ski shop for LINE, Armada, K2, Dynastar, Head and Rossignol in the UK and Europe. www.soulx.com
Jul 28 2005 10:51AM
0 0
profile picture
4frntmorrison
Posts: 660 - Karma: 10
the 6 pack didnt come on my motherships

*NS SKATEBOARDERS*
Jul 28 2005 11:29AM
0 0
profile picture
.[sanhedrin].
Posts: 1649 - Karma: 917
I still think that on the prophet 130 they should have made a 8 pack mount -- so that we could mount them up at core center. I don't know why they wouldn't just put 8 or more holes in all there skis to give more options. It could not mess up the durability that bad, could it?




-------------
surfaceskis.com
Jul 28 2005 11:33AM
0 0
profile picture
skoganskier101
Posts: 2067 - Karma: 14
they should do it for all of their skis. i guess its only for their pow skis though

Jul 28 2005 11:41AM
0 0
profile picture
4frntSkier
Posts: 4008 - Karma: 143
to bad the bindings arent to spiff great idea tho

Jul 28 2005 11:52AM
0 0
profile picture
Deezl
Posts: 2112 - Karma: 8
On the preproduction Motherships there were only 4 holes on most of them. That's why the ones you have ^^ only have 4.

The ones coming out this fall are supposed to have 6.

Jul 28 2005 1:42PM
0 0
profile picture
Lineskier-101
Posts: 7863 - Karma: 22
There should be a generic binding configuration, then ALL skis should do what Line is doing with their skis, that would save time, money, and alot of extra bindings.

----------------------------------------

05/06 Goals
-Learn Rails
-Learn 360's
-Learn DFD rail
-Learn Switch 360's
-Learn 540's
-Learn Switch 540's
-Unnaty 3's and 5's
Jul 28 2005 1:48PM
0 0
profile picture
hemlockjibber8
Posts: 5955 - Karma: 3,452
they cant do 8 holes because it gets in the way if you try and mount a regular binding on the skis

-------------------------------------
The re's business Schmuck
and there's rockstar Schmuck'
'the graphics should be completely flat black on his pro model... that would be intense.' -Jc_Dunn
LORD OF THE PARK 2006.....
Jul 28 2005 1:54PM
0 0
profile picture
Jib_This
Posts: 8272 - Karma: 9
I'm pretty sure I read something about heli-coiling extra holes into existing 4 hole pattern line skis to get a 6 or 8 pack of inserts.

Do NOT do this. Just don't. You'll rip out the bindings, the heli-coils, and you'll probably ruin the skis, not to mention your body.





The internet is for slandering others anonymously.
Jul 28 2005 3:03PM
0 0
profile picture
DaveHumphrey
Posts: 1758 - Karma: 82
all skis should do it. and all binding companys should start making ones that work with it




*************************************
the invaders are the oppisite of my penis. the invaders are realy soft and cant be larger than 178 cm.
Jul 28 2005 3:09PM
0 0
profile picture
4frntmorrison
Posts: 660 - Karma: 10
everything wpuld be so much better this way^ just think of it one pair of bindings for all your skis, being able to center mount one day then core center mounting the next

*NS SKATEBOARDERS*
Jul 28 2005 4:34PM
0 0
profile picture
LC.
Posts: 5952 - Karma: 2,423
No, that's not what I meant, I'm pretty sure that would rip out though, even if you could get helicoils that big, because they're all in one small area.

I was meaning put 16 helicoils on a ski so that you could mount a Look/Rossi/Salomon/etc binding on them in different positions. I'm pretty sure unused helicoils in a ski would be bad for flex and durability though.

Jul 28 2005 6:27PM
0 0
profile picture
Jib_This
Posts: 8272 - Karma: 9
^That's a big waste of time and money when you can just get the VIST speedlock system, which does more or less what you describe for VIST bindings, and does it safely, without the worries of heli-coils and screwing/re-screwing bindings.





The internet is for slandering others anonymously.
Jul 28 2005 8:39PM
0 0
profile picture
LC.
Posts: 5952 - Karma: 2,423
Got a link for some info on that?

Jul 28 2005 8:58PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)