Dynastar vs. line

Posts: 553 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 553

Ridiculous

Hahahahahahahahahaha.

Wow. The fact that this thread exists is a slap in Jason Levinthal's face.

Line. This isn't even close. Dynastar skis are absolute shit, and won't be any better next year because they have no apparent desire to improve anything that's clearly horribly wrong with them. Dynastar's skis suck, dynastar's company sucks and the fact that they sponsor Corey Vanular, who is admittedly freaking awesome, doesn't do enough to cover up their shitty, shitty product.

The fact that their team manager decided to explode himself on the front page of this site a few months ago doesn't help much either.

Jul 4 2005 1:45PM

0 0

garrett.

Posts: 9304 - Karma: 3,670

Karma: 3,670

Posts: 9304

Crazy Fool

thats because th 1260s suck..they are the worst line ski

kick there ass, drink there bear and steal there women

Jul 4 2005 2:00PM

0 0

Posts: 553 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 553

Ridiculous

They aren't.

Jul 4 2005 2:10PM

0 0

Ace3+4

Posts: 1493 - Karma: 50

Karma: 50

Posts: 1493

Insane

Wow thats a big comment
I bet uve never even riden dynastar skis, they go really well n the beland are amazing n i skied all year with them n no problem at all with my edges. they aren't that bad i haven't heard much people komplaining about them recently, fag

Rip more talk less

Jul 4 2005 2:28PM

0 0

Posts: 553 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 553

Ridiculous

Lately?! You're an idiot! They're the same skis as they have been for years, the Belan is IDENTICAL to this year's TM, last year's TM, and NEXT YEAR'S TM! Compared to pretty much every other ski on the market they suck... and they're the only skis that consistently deserve their reputation for durability issues.

Jul 4 2005 2:32PM

0 0

Lilhorsey

Posts: 579 - Karma: 19

Karma: 19

Posts: 579

Ridiculous

Trouble makers have to be the biggest piece of garbage ever. If you want to see a ski spontaniously combust while sliding rails, get trouble makers. Actually there is one ski that is worse that the trouble maker, it was called the Concept. The pow-air is a close third.

Jul 4 2005 3:15PM

0 0

ztragnoB

Posts: 1704 - Karma: 27

Karma: 27

Posts: 1704

Insane

dynastars are sick. They did a little edge work on next years but the beefier sidewalls/edges will come in the 06/07 season. Line has some good mid/fat skis but i wouldnt be caught dead on their skinny stuff

http://www.Free360XBOX.com/?r=18913397
Free Xbox 360, it actually works, from the makers of gratis networks. if your going to sign up anyway do it through me

Jul 4 2005 3:16PM

0 0

JFerg

Posts: 2440 - Karma: 62

Karma: 62

Posts: 2440

Addict

ar-six has no idea what he/she is talking about. ive ridden lines, and ive ridden dynastars. first off, ill be the first to say that the edges were pretty junk. i had TMs last year, and blew out 25 cm on one of the edges. this year i had the Belans and i didnt have 1 cracked edge. i skied more, skied harder, and slid twice as many rails. the flex on the dynastars are unmatched, and you can actually ski them outside park. lines are good park skis, no doubt about that, but anywhere outside of park, they blow. even in pipe, they cant hold an edge up a wall worth shit. they have pretty good edges, no doubt, but the flex pattern is disgusting. they have absolutely no support if you dont land perfectly on them. ive never ridden, their fattys or mid-fats, just the park skis, but i hear the bigger skis are actually pretty good outside of park. but either way, in the park and pipe, its no contest. dynastar blows line out of the water.

_________________________ just ski.

Jul 4 2005 4:29PM

0 0

Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273

Karma: 1,273

Posts: 20239

@th1337

Line edges break out really easily too. I've skiid Lines and i can't stand them. they are skinny and poopy, and the bindings always tear out. Troublemakers have a shitload of pop and perform awsomely in powder. I use my TMs for rails skis and I haven't borken the edges out. I am begining to think that TM edges only break out if you are doing huge gap to down rails and crazy shit.

I live in a place far far away, where on occasion the telly tubbies will come to play....and that's when Ma gets out the shotgun. Damn critters climb in our gutter system all the time.

Jul 4 2005 5:58PM

0 0

pag

Posts: 3412 - Karma: 69

Karma: 69

Posts: 3412

Addict

line all the way.

the tms are good skis but the edges fall apart in 2 weeks maximum.

Line is good shit way mroe durable

and line as way more skis than dynastar.

rock yo shit *NS Skateboarders Cult*

Jul 4 2005 6:03PM

0 0

Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273

Karma: 1,273

Posts: 20239

@th1337

Line is shit. too narrow.

I live in a place far far away, where on occasion the telly tubbies will come to play....and that's when Ma gets out the shotgun. Damn critters climb in our gutter system all the time.

Jul 4 2005 6:06PM

0 0

Fairview

Posts: 430 - Karma: 33

Karma: 33

Posts: 430

Ridiculous

What the fuck are you talking about? Line too narrow? The Tm's waist is still about 75. Have you ever heard of the prophet? Dynastar's new "fat" ski has a 92 waist. WOW! So wide and progressive. You don't even have an argument.

Jul 4 2005 6:38PM

0 0

WIllW

Posts: 4578 - Karma: 2,512

Karma: 2,512

Posts: 4578

No Life

next year theres wide chronics

_________________________________________ _
______''
Anything that makes snow deserves more respect than my mommy''- Giray
I HATE NY PRODUCTIONS

Jul 4 2005 6:49PM

0 0

Posts: 553 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 553

Ridiculous

I'm sorry, your screen name starts with Dynastar, you've never ridden any line ski aside from their park twin (assumedly just the 1260), and I'M THE ONE WHO HAS NO IDEA WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT? Of course the 12s suck outside the park, they're the bargain economy ski. If mean something like the old darksides, then you're trying to compare line of today with line of 3-4 years ago and you once again are out of your element, Donnie. Of course they suck in pipe, they're noodles. Ski some Pollards or the new Prophet 100s (if you have the snow for it) and then make a new comparison. The only reason I can think of for owning a TM is that you have such a diverse quiver that you can actually justify owning a pipe-only ski... For anything else, they suck huge balls.

Who here has that kind of quiver? Anybody?

Jul 4 2005 7:03PM

0 0

rudeboy

Posts: 270 - Karma: 375

Karma: 375

Posts: 270

Loner

dynastar - they make real freeride skies

Jul 4 2005 7:03PM

0 0

jibjim

Posts: 1814 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 1814

Insane

LINE they make skis that keep there edges after a single rail

------------------------------

"Now, Iannick Broulette, if that is your real name, I noticed your wearing an orange coat, would you call yourself the orange master?"
"uhhh, I dont,... uhh, no I don't think so"
Freetle Cody while interveiwing Iannick B at last years Orage Masters

"Cut your Board in Half and do it again and we'll give you a t-shirt"
Dave Chrihton after the snowboarder greased the c-rail at D-Camp

Jul 4 2005 7:29PM

0 0

wiglaf

Posts: 4877 - Karma: 141

Karma: 141

Posts: 4877

No Life

aside from edge issues, talking about skiing preformance, dynastar kills line.. not even close

`

Jul 4 2005 7:49PM

0 0

Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273

Karma: 1,273

Posts: 20239

@th1337

ok ok Lines skis aren't too narrow but I have skiid them and I dont like the way they feel. and TMs are 78 at the waist. The whole TM edge thing is totally exaggerated. they're not THAT weak to the point where they will break completely off in the first day.

I live in a place far far away, where on occasion the telly tubbies will come to play....and that's when Ma gets out the shotgun. Damn critters climb in our gutter system all the time.

Jul 4 2005 8:09PM

0 0

thomas_skier

Posts: 231 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 231

Loner

AR-6 does know what he's talking about unfortunately. And if you think the skis have pop, you haven't skied them long enough--they noodle in no time. Someone who just left their team will tell you that. I used to sell them to kids and that was the second biggest complaint (second only to "the edges fell off in the first month").
I'm not going to go into it, but Dynastar also had a nasty habit of selling heaps of products in an area through "newschool" reps without telling the stores who sold their product in those areas--this is a dickhead move towards local ski shops, and once the shops found out as the kids trickled in with their dynastar skis (wanting to have them mounted), the shops were not very happy. dynastar kept the program going, and tried to hide it by scrapping the website and telling reps to keep it on the d-low, even after the stores caught on and wanted them to stop.

Jul 4 2005 9:12PM

0 0

Posts: 13551 - Karma: 31

Karma: 31

Posts: 13551

Crazy Fool

Ar-Six just owned everyone supporting Dynastar. He's dead on. I've ridden both the TM, '04 1260 and Chronic and I'd choose the Chronic anyday. I was considering buying Belans but I made my mind up I'd rather spend 350 on a different ski. Like 300 on a new Invader.

Now don't get me wrong, I'm not going as far as Ar-Six here to say Dynastar totally sucks, just in this debate, Line wins. The construction, development and overall performance of Line stuff wins out over Dynastar.

If you look at posts over the past two year, a ton of it has been about Dynastars edges and how they are blowing and cracking and breaking, while things on the Chronic are how "super sick" it is and how it rips everywhere.

There is a picture on here, but I can't find it. And it kinda puts the nail-in-the-coffin on the TM's edges. I'ts 4 or 5 bases lined up all with busted edges. Look for it.

Stay Classy Newschoolers

Jul 4 2005 9:13PM

0 0

eheath

Posts: 61110 - Karma: 118,350

Karma: 118,350

Posts: 61110

Play Ball

neither, armada

what's up now bitch

"the fatter you are the smaller you go"-unknown

ACLs suck

Jul 4 2005 9:14PM

0 0

freestyle_rich

Posts: 1854 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 1854

Insane

apparently theres something wrong with both ski companies.

No Props!

Jul 4 2005 9:22PM

0 0

Posts: 13551 - Karma: 31

Karma: 31

Posts: 13551

Crazy Fool

Well yah, but were just talking straight Line v. Armada.

Stay Classy Newschoolers

Jul 4 2005 10:49PM

0 0

BoB11

Posts: 253 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 253

Loner

ar-6 got it down, plus line actually supports twin-tip skiing and puts effort into developing a better ski

Jul 5 2005 4:59PM

0 0

SkiUnit03

Posts: 3597 - Karma: 114

Karma: 114

Posts: 3597

Addict

also line has a shitload more skis to choose from. powder, all mountain, park, ect

'collars up are officially gay, but layering 2 polo shirts is still acceptable'
-ATLANTASKI

'r u sayin we r being censored by da goverment?
fuck pussy dick suckin lip

Jul 6 2005 2:01PM

0 0

*karma*

Posts: 1072 - Karma: 328

Karma: 328

Posts: 1072

Insane

my vote is line, line basicly did what a park person is looking for, a durable edge that is double the other ones, perfect graphics, perect construstion, and the new invaders are going to be phat, wide for those huge landings, but also have that nice butter zone, bascily i think line is just 20x better than dynastars...

Jul 6 2005 4:24PM

0 0

Posts: 13551 - Karma: 31

Karma: 31

Posts: 13551

Crazy Fool

Found that pic I was talking about, as posted by BigKicker. Just look.

Stay Classy Newschoolers

Jul 6 2005 7:52PM

0 0

1-pippin

Posts: 1741 - Karma: -2

Karma: -2

Posts: 1741

Insane

yeah dynastar hasnt changed their skis for a long time and i bet there keeing them the same for 06 too, line actually makes alot of different skis with different flex width and everything so you can tell line actually cares about skiing while dynastar only cares about monet

Jul 6 2005 8:47PM

0 0

1-pippin

Posts: 1741 - Karma: -2

Karma: -2

Posts: 1741

Insane

last word should be money

Jul 6 2005 8:48PM

0 0

lpskier5

Posts: 883 - Karma: 118

Karma: 118

Posts: 883

Insane

it depends on what kind of skiing you are gonna be doiun, if your spending your whole day in the park you should prolly go with line, theyll hold up better on rails and shit, but if like most people you want to be able to ski on your skis and not just be able to slide rails you want the troublemakers

Jul 7 2005 9:02AM

0 0

joshbryant

Posts: 2133 - Karma: 228

Karma: 228

Posts: 2133

Addict

Line's ski great out of the park. Ever used the Mothership? Or the pollard this year? Both sick all mountain skis. You can't say they are for park only.

Jibij Pro Shop
2714 28th St.
Boulder, CO 80301
303-440-1244
www.jibij.com

Jul 7 2005 12:05PM

0 0

Posts: 553 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 553

Ridiculous

Let's do a brief comparison here...

Dynastar TM
-Thin base/Edges
-Weak construction
-Decent all-mountain
-Not noodly
-Half twin
-"Wood" core, according to the website... skeeetchy.
-Torsion box

Line Assasin
-Thin base / edges (sort of)
-Still well built
-Great all mountain
-Not noodly
-Half twin
-Birch macroblock core
-Cap... but very good cap; Quadraxial weave.

... Why would anyone buy Dynastar when Line's HALF TWIN is better?

Jul 7 2005 12:19PM

0 0

Flynn

Posts: 1174 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 1174

Insane

If you don't do rails the TM's are as good as a comparable model in the lines (chronics). If you do rails their edges just aren't up to par with most other companies. TM's are great skis if you ignore their edges, which are a huge unignorable problem to most people.

Jul 7 2005 5:47PM

0 0

ski@jaypeak2

Posts: 2800 - Karma: 394

Karma: 394

Posts: 2800

Addict

I dont think you should be comparing the assasin since that is their all mountain ski and barley even has a twin tip

You can't hug with nuclear arms

Jul 7 2005 6:01PM

0 0

ski@jaypeak2

Posts: 2800 - Karma: 394

Karma: 394

Posts: 2800

Addict

nevermind i just finished reading your post

go line im getting the chrinics to replace my skogens

You can't hug with nuclear arms

Jul 7 2005 6:02PM

0 0

Posts: 13551 - Karma: 31

Karma: 31

Posts: 13551

Crazy Fool

The TM is a half twin, or just not equal like Line's park stuff?

Also, the Assassin, the HALF TWIN, isn't even built for park, its just to tear it up everywhere. Its great haha.

Stay Classy Newschoolers

Jul 7 2005 6:07PM

0 0

bret

Posts: 2845 - Karma: 833

Karma: 833

Posts: 2845

Addict

i think what AR-six was referring to was the really low tips that the TM's have. they might be equal height, but it doesn't matter because the front and back are both SUPER low. my friend who rides TM's has had trouble a buncha times getting his tails caught in mushy snow.

my level of radness... it just can't... be quantified.

Jul 7 2005 7:17PM

0 0

......gus.....

Posts: 259 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 259

Loner

i dunno some friends ride TM's last year nd they haven't screwed the edges...i wonder if its the skiier..like if u try crazy shit? yeah but they have no probs with their TM's they love 'em

Jul 7 2005 10:56PM

0 0

Posts: 553 - Karma: 10

Karma: 10

Posts: 553

Ridiculous

TM tails are raised 37mm, Line's true twin is around 55ish, and their directional twin (which is what assasins have) is in the low 30s. It tends to vary with production as to the EXACT height.

Jul 8 2005 1:13AM

0 0

Jwenz

Posts: 8893 - Karma: 7,633

Karma: 7,633

Posts: 8893

Crazy Fool

No see I really don't wanna read what all the other kids say...so don't mind me if i repeat...In my mind i believe that LINE has a better freestyle ski, and I will tell you why. Does Dynastar only make freestyle skis?NOOOO! They may have more money, but the thing is that they aren't just focused on the freestyle portion of there ski company. There fore my ski choice would have to be LINE

Swollen is the way to go, holla

Jul 8 2005 7:38AM

0 0