Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
in the past decade i cant think of many times where the west has bested the east. but, that said, i strongly agree that the western conference is just better hockey. more gritty, more physical, more of a team game. the emphasis is on lines (marleau, heatley, thornton / datsyuk, zetterberg, holmstrom / toews, sharp, kane) rather than players (crosby / stamkos / ovechkin).
by the way how the hell is dallas doing so well? i can't even think of any star on that team. brenden morrow, i guess, though he's a little past his prime. loui eriksson? lulz. they're killing it, somehow
HUGE game tonite on versus....i got playoff butterflies in my stomach. go pens!!
why are the wild named the 'minnesota wild'? why are the hurricanes named the 'carolina hurricanes'? every other team is named after the city they play in. i understand that you can't name yourself after the state when there's more than one team in that state, but there are other states that only have one team representing them and theyre still named after the city. hmmm..
st paul wild?
raleigh hurricanes?
yeah good point. thats all i could come up with at the top of my head.
you couldn't really do state though, cause what would you do for states that have multiple teams
pennsylvania penguins or pennsylvania fliers? or are you suggesting they should just have both, like the new york rangers and new york islanders..
i just hate the lack of continuity
yeah there's probably some underlying political reasoning that we arent aware of. i just found myself thinking about that and wondering why. im a science major, i like definitive, objective answers haha.