Red Bull Unrailistic | LIVE Broadcast

Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Do you believe there is a God?

profile picture
milk_man
Posts: 5214 - Karma: 6,494
Do you believe in God? Do you believe there is one God, or many gods? Or no God at all.. Are we alone on earth?


If there is no God then everything is relative, which means morality is relative. If you don't believe in God then where do you gain your sense of right and wrong? From laws and rules created by the GOVERNMENT?


I want interesting discussion, but preferably no one getting mad and offended. I won't get offended if you won't.
POLL
Edit Poll
Votes:

Take care when editing a poll; Options should be similar to maintain vote integrity.

More options will be added automatically as you type. You must supply a question and at least two options. No HTML is allowed.

Jan 15 2015 10:07AM
1712 1038
profile picture
Shredsterr
Posts: 2090 - Karma: 6,930
milk_manHitler was an atheist. Nazi Germany was filled with atheism. That's all I have to say



Stalin was an atheist, Hitler was not. He references God multiple time in Mein Kampf. This is a quote from the book.

"I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.."

Of course, everybody here already knows you're legally retarded, so this response wasn't even necessary. Just to clarify, I'm not calling you retarded based on your ideologies, I'm calling you retarded because you say really dumb things and make yourself look like a dumb ass.
Jan 29 2015 6:25PM
6 1
profile picture
milk_man
Posts: 5214 - Karma: 6,494
ShredsterrStalin was an atheist, Hitler was not. He references God multiple time in Mein Kampf. This is a quote from the book.

"I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.."

Of course, everybody here already knows you're legally retarded, so this response wasn't even necessary. Just to clarify, I'm not calling you retarded based on your ideologies, I'm calling you retarded because you say really dumb things and make yourself look like a dumb ass.


I already clarified that I realize I was wrong.
Jan 29 2015 7:26PM
1 3
profile picture
milk_man
Posts: 5214 - Karma: 6,494
ShredsterrStalin was an atheist, Hitler was not. He references God multiple time in Mein Kampf. This is a quote from the book.

"I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord.."

Of course, everybody here already knows you're legally retarded, so this response wasn't even necessary. Just to clarify, I'm not calling you retarded based on your ideologies, I'm calling you retarded because you say really dumb things and make yourself look like a dumb ass.


I got Stalin and Hitler's worldviews mixed up in my head, guess that makes me retarded, huh?
Jan 29 2015 7:27PM
1 2
profile picture
deleted5
Posts: 14507 - Karma: 13,500
milk_manI got Stalin and Hitler's worldviews mixed up in my head, guess that makes me retarded, huh?


No but you believe in the earth is 12,000 years old does.
Jan 29 2015 10:42PM
6 1
profile picture
milk_man
Posts: 5214 - Karma: 6,494
zzzskizzzNo but you believe in the earth is 12,000 years old does.


So you consider millions of people in America and a couple billion people across the world retarded because of that?
Jan 29 2015 10:45PM
2 7
profile picture
deleted5
Posts: 14507 - Karma: 13,500
milk_manSo you consider millions of people in America and a couple billion people across the world retarded because of that?
nominated
Jan 29 2015 10:46PM
11 1
profile picture
J.D.
Posts: 21362 - Karma: 5,141
milk_manSo you consider millions of people in America and a couple billion people across the world retarded because of that?

Haha... at minimum, ignorant, stupid and gullible, yeah.
Jan 29 2015 10:46PM
13 1
profile picture
milk_man
Posts: 5214 - Karma: 6,494
J.D.Haha... at minimum, ignorant, stupid and gullible, yeah.


Alright you can go on believing that
Jan 29 2015 10:54PM
2 8
profile picture
mseward
Posts: 1041 - Karma: 1,243
I find alot of people take religion and the bible way too literally. I think modern science has quite clearly proven that earth is way older than 12k yrs but you can still be religious knowing that. They are called bible "Stories" afterall. Im definitley not the most religious guy out there but i was raised in a mostly christian community/ very christian family and for me its mostly about the messages that the stories have and just trying to be a good person to other people. Who really cares how old the earth is thats just not the point at all. You have to remember that the bible is old as fuck and you cant take it literally because society has completely changed.

Do I think theres a god? I dont know
Should people be good to one another and forgive eachother? Yes

Will end with this quote because its relevant and i agree with it

"At the end of the day, if there was indeed some Body or presence standing there to judge me, I hoped I would be judged on whether I had lived a true life, not on whether I believed in a certain book, or whether I'd been baptised.”- Lance Armstrong

/rant
Jan 29 2015 11:35PM
4 0
profile picture
deleted5
Posts: 14507 - Karma: 13,500
milk_manAlright you can go on believing that


Here's what I don't understand about religious extremists thinking. What you said up there was incorrect, your numbers are so off its funny. You actually did think Hitler was an atheist, don't even try to play that off thinking it was Stalin. Because not only have you said that in other threads, but a lot of Christians try to use that as the trump card about why atheism is bad, when Ive argued with them.

what I don't understand is that I'm sure many people have told you your thinking is incorrect that the world is not 12,000 years old, and you've never once said to yourself. Hey maybe I should go look at the other side and see what they think. instead of I'm going to go in believing my own biased views cover my ears and not listen to anything. If you're not open to changing your opinions you're never going to learn anything new ir grow as a person. You've made your religious opinions and views part of you, and now you're in so deep in. I don't think you're ever going to change them no matter what proof is presented to you.
Jan 29 2015 11:37PM
4 0
profile picture
SupremeDeity
Posts: 695 - Karma: 1,112
zzzskizzzHere's what I don't understand about religious extremists thinking. What you said up there was incorrect, your numbers are so off its funny. You actually did think Hitler was an atheist, don't even try to play that off thinking it was Stalin. Because not only have you said that in other threads, but a lot of Christians try to use that as the trump card about why atheism is bad, when Ive argued with them.

what I don't understand is that I'm sure many people have told you your thinking is incorrect that the world is not 12,000 years old, and you've never once said to yourself. Hey maybe I should go look at the other side and see what they think. instead of I'm going to go in believing my own biased views cover my ears and not listen to anything. If you're not open to changing your opinions you're never going to learn anything new ir grow as a person. You've made your religious opinions and views part of you, and now you're in so deep in. I don't think you're ever going to change them no matter what proof is presented to you.


False the world is only 2000 years old
Jan 29 2015 11:55PM
0 1
profile picture
milk_man
Posts: 5214 - Karma: 6,494
zzzskizzzHere's what I don't understand about religious extremists thinking. What you said up there was incorrect, your numbers are so off its funny. You actually did think Hitler was an atheist, don't even try to play that off thinking it was Stalin. Because not only have you said that in other threads, but a lot of Christians try to use that as the trump card about why atheism is bad, when Ive argued with them.

what I don't understand is that I'm sure many people have told you your thinking is incorrect that the world is not 12,000 years old, and you've never once said to yourself. Hey maybe I should go look at the other side and see what they think. instead of I'm going to go in believing my own biased views cover my ears and not listen to anything. If you're not open to changing your opinions you're never going to learn anything new ir grow as a person. You've made your religious opinions and views part of you, and now you're in so deep in. I don't think you're ever going to change them no matter what proof is presented to you.


Actually no I haven't said that in any other threads, you can go try to find that though


I've had people explain carbon dating to me. I've also had people explain it's flaws to me. Because thats really the only 'proof' of the earth being as old as you say. There are other explanations for earth layers and deep rivers beds such as the Grand Canyon
Jan 30 2015 9:51AM
2 3
profile picture
deleted5
Posts: 14507 - Karma: 13,500
milk_manActually no I haven't said that in any other threads, you can go try to find that though


I've had people explain carbon dating to me. I've also had people explain it's flaws to me. Because thats really the only 'proof' of the earth being as old as you say. There are other explanations for earth layers and deep rivers beds such as the Grand Canyon


First of all if somebody told you the flaws of carbon dating. Then they don't know what carbon dating is, or have an extremely biased view and they're from your church. second of all there are multiple ways to date the earth not just carbon dating if you actually bothered to learn it you would know that.
Jan 30 2015 12:21PM
1 0
profile picture
TheBigApple
Posts: 1169 - Karma: 488
J.D.Haha... at minimum, ignorant, stupid and gullible, yeah.


This. I have no respect for people who believe the earth is that young. Use your fucking head!
Jan 30 2015 12:35PM
3 0
profile picture
TheBigApple
Posts: 1169 - Karma: 488
milk_manActually no I haven't said that in any other threads, you can go try to find that though


I've had people explain carbon dating to me. I've also had people explain it's flaws to me. Because thats really the only 'proof' of the earth being as old as you say. There are other explanations for earth layers and deep rivers beds such as the Grand Canyon


Carbon dating can't date the age of the earth. That's basic science you might have learned in grade 8. It has a half life of about 5700 years. There are many other radioactive isotopes that work far better, and many other methods of dating the earth. There are no other explanations for sedimentary rock and the grand canyon, it's simple sedimentology. You are obviously trolling or literally a stupid fuck.
Jan 30 2015 12:40PM
6 0
profile picture
Charlie_Kelly
Posts: 11953 - Karma: 12,296
milk_manActually no I haven't said that in any other threads, you can go try to find that though


I've had people explain carbon dating to me. I've also had people explain it's flaws to me. Because thats really the only 'proof' of the earth being as old as you say. There are other explanations for earth layers and deep rivers beds such as the Grand Canyon


Jesus, you are just straight up ignoring science.
Jan 31 2015 12:26AM
1 0
profile picture
ABalls
Posts: 2091 - Karma: 3,754
So here's a little fun fact: (this isn't exact but it's close)

-even though we are like 80% christian only about 10% of those people can recite the Ten Commandments or show any sign that they are christian at all.

As for your question Attention_Whore, nothing has happened yet in my life to really lean me one way or the other so for now I'm just chillin Ya dig??
Jan 31 2015 1:21AM
1 0
profile picture
las.
Posts: 1959 - Karma: 1,455
milk_manI've had people explain carbon dating to me. I've also had people explain it's flaws to me. Because thats really the only 'proof' of the earth being as old as you say. There are other explanations for earth layers and deep rivers beds such as the Grand Canyon


Please expand on your latter claim with supporting scientific evidence.

Also, I've explained carbon dating to you on this forum before. What did you not understand? What are its flaws, in your opinion?
Jan 31 2015 1:28AM
0 0
profile picture
Nikolaus
Posts: 863 - Karma: 995
I've had people explain carbon dating to me. I've also had people explain it's flaws to me. Because thats really the only 'proof' of the earth being as old as you say. There are other explanations for earth layers and deep rivers beds such as the Grand Canyon[/QUOTE]

It must be hard being that retarted.
Jan 31 2015 1:47AM
0 0
profile picture
notspoicey
Posts: 1167 - Karma: 1,706
milk_manActually no I haven't said that in any other threads, you can go try to find that though


I've had people explain carbon dating to me. I've also had people explain it's flaws to me. Because thats really the only 'proof' of the earth being as old as you say. There are other explanations for earth layers and deep rivers beds such as the Grand Canyon


zzzskizzzFirst of all if somebody told you the flaws of carbon dating. Then they don't know what carbon dating is, or have an extremely biased view and they're from your church. second of all there are multiple ways to date the earth not just carbon dating if you actually bothered to learn it you would know that.


TheBigAppleCarbon dating can't date the age of the earth. That's basic science you might have learned in grade 8. It has a half life of about 5700 years. There are many other radioactive isotopes that work far better, and many other methods of dating the earth. There are no other explanations for sedimentary rock and the grand canyon, it's simple sedimentology. You are obviously trolling or literally a stupid fuck.


NickyToorI've had people explain carbon dating to me. I've also had people explain it's flaws to me. Because thats really the only 'proof' of the earth being as old as you say. There are other explanations for earth layers and deep rivers beds such as the Grand Canyon

It must be hard being that retarted.


Settle down, ladies.
Jan 31 2015 2:09AM
2 2
profile picture
Byron_tha_gr8
Posts: 4573 - Karma: 14,298
ginSettle down, ladies.


no boyfriend yet?
Jan 31 2015 7:52AM
2 2
profile picture
milk_man
Posts: 5214 - Karma: 6,494
las.Please expand on your latter claim with supporting scientific evidence.

Also, I've explained carbon dating to you on this forum before. What did you not understand? What are its flaws, in your opinion?


We assume that carbon-14 has always formed at the rate it does today. Which to me seems unlikely, not that you guys care what I think
Jan 31 2015 9:02AM
1 3
profile picture
ajrowlands
Posts: 43 - Karma: 93
https://www.newschoolers.com/videos/watch/752277/Stephen-Fry-on-God---The-Meaning-Of-Life---RT------One
Jan 31 2015 10:03AM
3 0
profile picture
.frenchy
Posts: 18212 - Karma: 12,257
ginSettle down, ladies.


this. so much this.


if you're atheist, cool. if you're religious, great. Nobodys view is going to change over some debate on a ski forum.
Jan 31 2015 12:04PM
4 4
profile picture
Shredsterr
Posts: 2090 - Karma: 6,930
milk_manI got Stalin and Hitler's worldviews mixed up in my head, guess that makes me retarded, huh?


Yes.
Jan 31 2015 12:59PM
6 1
profile picture
Shredsterr
Posts: 2090 - Karma: 6,930
.frenchythis. so much this.


if you're atheist, cool. if you're religious, great. Nobodys view is going to change over some debate on a ski forum.


WHAT IF I YELL LOUDER THAN THE PEOPLE THAT DON'T AGREE WITH ME?!?!?!?
Jan 31 2015 1:02PM
0 0
profile picture
milk_man
Posts: 5214 - Karma: 6,494
.frenchythis. so much this.


if you're atheist, cool. if you're religious, great. Nobodys view is going to change over some debate on a ski forum.


I'm not trying to change what anyone thinks
Jan 31 2015 1:42PM
0 0
profile picture
deleted5
Posts: 14507 - Karma: 13,500
milk_manWe assume that carbon-14 has always formed at the rate it does today. Which to me seems unlikely, not that you guys care what I think


http://ncse.com/cej/3/2/answers-to-creationist-attacks-carbon-14-dating

Here op ignore this too.
Jan 31 2015 1:53PM
2 1
profile picture
PowPirate
Posts: 437 - Karma: 621
ajrowlandshttps://www.newschoolers.com/videos/watch/752277/Stephen-Fry-on-God---The-Meaning-Of-Life---RT------One


came here to post this! beat me to it
Jan 31 2015 1:58PM
0 0
profile picture
AmateurPilgrim
Posts: 286 - Karma: 2,666
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9yQEG7mlTU
Jan 31 2015 6:36PM
0 0
profile picture
las.
Posts: 1959 - Karma: 1,455
milk_manThere are other explanations for earth layers and deep rivers beds such as the Grand Canyon


You ignored my question. Give me the other explanations, and provide examples.

milk_manWe assume that carbon-14 has always formed at the rate it does today. Which to me seems unlikely, not that you guys care what I think


I think you're confusing forming with decaying. Which one's rate is it that you think may fluctuate? Why does carbon-14's rate of whatever being constant seem unlikely to you?
Stop evading people's questions
Jan 31 2015 8:02PM
0 0
profile picture
.frenchy
Posts: 18212 - Karma: 12,257
ShredsterrWHAT IF I YELL LOUDER THAN THE PEOPLE THAT DON'T AGREE WITH ME?!?!?!?


looool 2 tru

milk_manI'm not trying to change what anyone thinks


I wasn't saying you were....
Jan 31 2015 10:53PM
1 4
profile picture
milk_man
Posts: 5214 - Karma: 6,494
las.You ignored my question. Give me the other explanations, and provide examples.



I think you're confusing forming with decaying. Which one's rate is it that you think may fluctuate? Why does carbon-14's rate of whatever being constant seem unlikely to you?
Stop evading people's questions


Don't really feel like getting laughed at


It seems unlikely that both the rate of formation and rate of decay wouldn't always be there same because of changes (extreme changes) in climate (ice ages etc). Or just time itself. When you guys start talking about millions of years like its nothing.. That's when I start to wonder if anyone can actually wrap their mind around how long even just one million years is and the amount of change that would take place on earth in that time
Feb 1 2015 1:56AM
1 1
profile picture
Utard
Posts: 2132 - Karma: 296
milk_manWhen you guys start talking about millions of years like its nothing.. That's when I start to wonder if anyone can actually wrap their mind around how long even just one million years is and the amount of change that would take place on earth in that time


So we can't wrap our heads mind around the fact that the earth has existed for longer than 6000 years but for some reason you can wrap your mind around an omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent, non-spatial, non-temporal being that can create shit out of nothing and wasn't created itself? Please.
Feb 1 2015 2:20AM
5 1
profile picture
milk_man
Posts: 5214 - Karma: 6,494
UtardSo we can't wrap our heads mind around the fact that the earth has existed for longer than 6000 years but for some reason you can wrap your mind around an omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent, non-spatial, non-temporal being that can create shit out of nothing and wasn't created itself? Please.


Don't twist my words. 1 I said we can't wrap our mind around millions of years. Never said anything about 6,000 years. 2. Christians don't think they can wrap their mind around God. We know we can't. But hey, at least we admit we can't completely understand everything.
Feb 1 2015 10:20AM
0 0
profile picture
Byron_tha_gr8
Posts: 4573 - Karma: 14,298
milk_manDon't twist my words. 1 I said we can't wrap our mind around millions of years. Never said anything about 6,000 years. 2. Christians don't think they can wrap their mind around God. We know we can't. But hey, at least we admit we can't completely understand everything.


why should i believe you vs the Muslims, Buddhists, Jews, etc.

As Bill Burr said, the only reason your crazy story makes sense to you and the others don't, is because youve been hearing it since you were four.
Feb 1 2015 1:10PM
1 1
profile picture
rylee.the.jedi
Posts: 410 - Karma: 368
To me the definition of God is what is vital. God is no human, human beings are fucked up creatures, why would a higher being reflect us. But to me God is energy and since energy can't be destroyed or created God was always there he created this Universe through laws and codes. And since we are energy we are God but God is not us. Just my two cents..but religion is fucked and good things can be taken from all religions but should not be followed because they are second hand experiences not science.
Feb 1 2015 3:45PM
0 2
profile picture
deleted5
Posts: 14507 - Karma: 13,500
milk_manDon't really feel like getting laughed at


It seems unlikely that both the rate of formation and rate of decay wouldn't always be there same because of changes (extreme changes) in climate (ice ages etc). Or just time itself. When you guys start talking about millions of years like its nothing.. That's when I start to wonder if anyone can actually wrap their mind around how long even just one million years is and the amount of change that would take place on earth in that time


Carbon dating only works till about twenty thousand years. Anything over that, and it becomes unreliable. There are other methods we use to date when the earth first formed, and we don't use carbon 14 or the Grand Canyon. When the earth first formed, it was actually molten lava there were no rocks.
Feb 1 2015 9:18PM
1 1
profile picture
Byron_tha_gr8
Posts: 4573 - Karma: 14,298
zzzskizzzCarbon dating only works till about twenty thousand years. Anything over that, and it becomes unreliable. There are other methods we use to date when the earth first formed, and we don't use carbon 14 or the Grand Canyon. When the earth first formed, it was actually molten lava there were no rocks.


thats why we don't use carbon dating. Lead isotopes have much longer half lives and are more accurate over long periods of time than carbon.

Which was used to estimate earth's age from rocks, namely rocks in outer space, and craters on earth. Its complex, but there's no leap of faith, just science.
Feb 1 2015 11:47PM
0 0
profile picture
Utard
Posts: 2132 - Karma: 296
Hey milk_man do you believe in evolution?
Feb 2 2015 1:43AM
0 0
profile picture
milk_man
Posts: 5214 - Karma: 6,494
UtardHey milk_man do you believe in evolution?


I think you know the answer to that
Feb 2 2015 9:23AM
2 4
profile picture
elinde
Posts: 1459 - Karma: 2,934
milk_manI think you know the answer to that


You can believe in evolution while being a creationist. If you don't believe that organisms change to adapt to environments, I don't know what to tell you. I've met plenty of intelligent people who believe in creation, but they usually involve science in their theories rather than just completely ignoring it.

Question, what do you make of ancient human-like primate remains that have been found and are clearly different from the humans we see today?
Feb 2 2015 5:24PM
0 0
profile picture
Utard
Posts: 2132 - Karma: 296
elindeQuestion, what do you make of ancient human-like primate remains that have been found and are clearly different from the humans we see today?


They must have been only partially created in God's image, but we're the real thing dammit
Feb 2 2015 5:40PM
0 1
profile picture
las.
Posts: 1959 - Karma: 1,455
milk_manI think you know the answer to that


And you wonder why you're getting laughed at. You're essentially saying that verifiable scientific fact, which is supported by pretty much the entire scientific community, is wrong, and the real explanation for our existence is a magical wizard who lives in the sky, of whom we have absolutey no evidence of. It's pure, unadulterated insanity. You are deranged, and if you weren't making such claims under the protection and get-out-of-jail card of religion, you'd be thrown in the loony bin
Feb 2 2015 6:00PM
3 1
profile picture
.frenchy
Posts: 18212 - Karma: 12,257
milk_manI think you know the answer to that


Are you a retarded troll or just a retard? The Roman Catholic church has acknowledged Darwinian Evolution for a long time now and as a Catholic you can believe in evolution as long as you recognize God had a part in doing it.


I know this will get down rated a shit ton, but really I don't care. It's pretty childish how you guys are still going at it on page 5, why are you even arguing? You aren't going to change anyones mind. I already know God is real.
Feb 2 2015 8:54PM
1 5
profile picture
las.
Posts: 1959 - Karma: 1,455
.frenchyAre you a retarded troll


Oh, the irony
Feb 2 2015 9:01PM
5 1
profile picture
.frenchy
Posts: 18212 - Karma: 12,257
las.Oh, the irony


You must not know what a troll is big guy. I'm actually being serious at the moment lol, trolling is joking around to get a rise out of people.

I get it, you're one of those atheists who thinks they're better than people who are religious... The difference between me and you is i'm not trying to change peoples minds about their beliefs, it's a thing called respect. Something you obviously don't have.
Feb 2 2015 9:07PM
1 4
profile picture
Blurst
Posts: 13577 - Karma: 10,168
.frenchyYou must not know what a troll is big guy. I'm actually being serious at the moment lol, trolling is joking around to get a rise out of people.

I get it, you're one of those atheists who thinks they're better than people who are religious... The difference between me and you is i'm not trying to change peoples minds about their beliefs, it's a thing called respect. Something you obviously don't have.


I think he was commenting more on your character than your post itself, it is a pretty accurate statement when you look at it like that though.
Feb 2 2015 9:11PM
3 0
profile picture
milk_man
Posts: 5214 - Karma: 6,494
elindeYou can believe in evolution while being a creationist. If you don't believe that organisms change to adapt to environments, I don't know what to tell you. I've met plenty of intelligent people who believe in creation, but they usually involve science in their theories rather than just completely ignoring it.

Question, what do you make of ancient human-like primate remains that have been found and are clearly different from the humans we see today?


I believe in "Micro evolution" ... Because we can observe it happening...



In micro evolution the DNA of the organism isn't changing... In macro it is..
Feb 2 2015 9:34PM
1 2
All times are Eastern (-4)