I mean why would u not ?

SurfaceIsdurableI mean why would u not ?

well it’s stiffer and bigger, just didn’t know whether it’d be too long or not

bootspacewell it’s stiffer and bigger, just didn’t know whether it’d be too long or not

Well how tall are you then?

if that’s the height you like to ride a general ski then why change it unless you’re buying a completely different ski for a different purpose?

dwt802Well how tall are you then?

if that’s the height you like to ride a general ski then why change it unless you’re buying a completely different ski for a different purpose?

i’m 5’11 and i like 183 on the wets, i just haven’t ridden anything above 90 underfoot and wanted some opinions

bootspacei’m 5’11 and i like 183 on the wets, i just haven’t ridden anything above 90 underfoot and wanted some opinions

Based on your height i would definitely stick with 183. Vishnus ride incredibly short from the rocker profile and flex, even the wide plus. Going down in size would feel like you have no support. Plus long skis are steez. You could potentially go up to the 189 as well but I would only do that if you prefer a long ski and are going for style over spin to win, or hitting a lot of pow laps. Just my thoughts

TASBased on your height i would definitely stick with 183. Vishnus ride incredibly short from the rocker profile and flex, even the wide plus. Going down in size would feel like you have no support. Plus long skis are steez. You could potentially go up to the 189 as well but I would only do that if you prefer a long ski and are going for style over spin to win, or hitting a lot of pow laps. Just my thoughts

thanks man, yeah i’m not going 189 just yet i just needed an outside voice on this. don’t got the money nor the time to buy skis that are too short