I see the difference in the layer construction of the two jackets and it appears that the supernaut is "the better jacket". Is either one more durable than the other? Is there a major difference in the fits? I'm looking at the small and I'm like 5'5". I don't foresee too much backcountry hiking in my future but there's sweet deals on both these jackets and a minimal price difference between the two.
Well, One of them is a Gore-tex pro jacket and the other is a normal 2 layer, which be most likely be ''thicker'' than the 3l and would be less breathable.
Pretty sure the supernaut gonna be a 70D, so it's pretty durable, I can't tell for the hammer
This might help you: http://blistergearreview.com/gear-reviews/sweet-protection-supernaut-jacket
If the price difference don't bother you, I'll get the supernaut for sure.
That's what I did, and I read that review and some of the other stuff they had. Fortunately I'm a biochemist and I've used SEM's before so, the chemistry stuff was cool.
a_pla5tic_bagThat's what I did, and I read that review and some of the other stuff they had. Fortunately I'm a biochemist and I've used SEM's before so, the chemistry stuff was cool.
Well, I'm not good im chemistry stuff. But , Grab the supernaut for sure, such a nice jacket