Interested!

125-100-125, symetrical flex, center mounted, slight early rise tip and tail?!

Don't be fooled it is just TBK in disguese

dingusDon't be fooled it is just TBK in disguese

jk this guy can actually spell

dingusDon't be fooled it is just TBK in disguese

TBK? Taco Burrito King? mmmm

newmieTBK? Taco Burrito King? mmmm

Not exactly

perfect for me would be : 182cm 120/94/120 40cm length of rocker each end and 5mm of camber rise. stiff underfoot medium flex tips 50/50 burliness/lightness ratio.

Overall Length 1821

Running Length 1171

Nose Length 325

Tail Length 325

Nose Width 100

Tail Width 100

Waist Width 92.56

Sidecut Radius 46000

Sidecut Bias -2

Stance Width 550

Stance Setback 0

Nose Height 76

Tail Height 76

Camber 17

Camber Setback 0

square tips and tails with this graphic

dingusDon't be fooled it is just TBK in disguese

dingusjk this guy can actually spell

you can't either

L0gicyou can't either

my excuse is I am on mobile and my phone is shattered.... will it work??????

dingusmy excuse is I am on mobile and my phone is shattered.... will it work??????

haha, you're all good

Super interested! Concept sounds simple and straightforward.

Something 95 in the waist, symmetrical, 183 length, 20M turn radius

very slight early rise in the nose and tail

stiff so it has a fucking set

two plates of steel that goes under foot and tac weld the edges underfoot to the metal

rivet the nose and tail

rubber dampeners in the nose and tail to reduce vibration directly to the tips which I probably delam in ten days(about how long my skis last in big sky and how my skis have exploded in the last 4 years)

ptex sidewalls so I can easily repair sidewalls,

use whatever base material lib tech or on3p uses. most durable base for big sky. I tune skis at big sky and the only bases that last are lib tech and on3p.

Basically make me skis that don't break and last a season. I'm getting tired of the bullshit durability in the industry for my riding style. Unless its pressed with steel its going to delam in 10 days. Steel should not be necessary to keep skis from vibrating apart though.

120-88-120with a durable side wall underfoot that turns to cap. Make it buttery in the tips and a medium to stiff flex underfoot. Have a symeterical camber rocker profile that has rocked of 10mm up 150mm long in tip and tail with 4mm camber. And make it super light and poppy

Already got a pair! 118 - 90 - 118, sym. core, e/r tip, carbon! shakenbaby graphics by Drew Pigott!

WICKED!

graphics are the middle pair, shape, camber and core are custom

I think for another pair, 122 - 95 - 122, with everything else the same would be rad. A little more width for backcountry kickers, a little more turny for carving into jumps. They also offer a Kevlar (think bullet proof vest) binding plate for sliding rails - sidewalls are still holding strong on my skis!

last_tangoSomething 95 in the waist, symmetrical, 183 length, 20M turn radius

very slight early rise in the nose and tail

stiff so it has a fucking set

two plates of steel that goes under foot and tac weld the edges underfoot to the metal

rivet the nose and tail

rubber dampeners in the nose and tail to reduce vibration directly to the tips which I probably delam in ten days(about how long my skis last in big sky and how my skis have exploded in the last 4 years)

ptex sidewalls so I can easily repair sidewalls,

use whatever base material lib tech or on3p uses. most durable base for big sky. I tune skis at big sky and the only bases that last are lib tech and on3p.

Basically make me skis that don't break and last a season. I'm getting tired of the bullshit durability in the industry for my riding style. Unless its pressed with steel its going to delam in 10 days. Steel should not be necessary to keep skis from vibrating apart though.

Honestly rayzrblaydz have most of those attributes. Same construction as on3p, same bases, same edges, vulcanized rubber, ect.

shin-bangHonestly rayzrblaydz have most of those attributes. Same construction as on3p, same bases, same edges, vulcanized rubber, ect.

Looking for steel underfoot to help prevent binding pullouts and looking for a new design or way of thinking about your edges underfoot. Kitten Factory is dope though and I have rode on carbon pows for a day. They are great guys that make a very good product.

last_tangoLooking for steel underfoot to help prevent binding pullouts and looking for a new design or way of thinking about your edges underfoot. Kitten Factory is dope though and I have rode on carbon pows for a day. They are great guys that make a very good product.

ahhh so youre on the next level stuff. i see. ive honestly thought about instead of a base underfoot, using a small piece of lightweight but strong metal so when youre hitting rails it would be metal on metal. but then i wonder if that would make sliding rails super sticky and you wont actually slide that well. that probly doesnt make any sense but ill try to check back here a little later as im short on time rn

JosephRikysperfect for me would be : 182cm 120/94/120 40cm length of rocker each end and 5mm of camber rise. stiff underfoot medium flex tips 50/50 burliness/lightness ratio.

Brah u just describe the faction 1.0s I think

style_senseiBrah u just describe the faction 1.0s I think

Nah fam. I'm talking fatter with much more rocker.

115-95-115, symmetrical flex and rocker camber rocker with early rise in tips and tails.

how about something with some camber underfoot and slight rocker tip and tail?

like 110 underfoot.

I would rock a fully semmetrical ski (slightly slimmer in tail) with early rise tip and tail and tons of camber underfoot to be hella poppy. Probly 100 underfoot and maybe 120 or so in the tip and tail. And a short turn radius as well to bang out some euro carves. That with custom graphics and custom base design would make me wanna cop a pair.

gotta have

durability

tight turn radius

custom graphics+base color

fully symmetrical

Tip tail early rise and early taper

100 under foot

120 or so in tip/tail

soft tip/tail while stiffer underfoot

kevlar under foot

That would be an all mountain buttery park weapon

dino.rosa.7I would rock a fully semmetrical ski (slightly slimmer in tail)

then it wouldnt be symmetrical**

jackdonovanthen it wouldnt be symmetrical**

I think he meant symmetrical core profile, slightly less than symmetrical shape - which is a super fun style ski. The sym. core gives good even swing weight, while the slightly off sym. shape is more conducive to less than 50% switch skiing.

I like it