I am moving to bozeman and am not sure which pass to go for. On one end bridger is so close, with cool terrain and generally gets more snow but i hear has bad crowds. On the other end big sky is absolutely massive with terrain that can scare you and no crowds. does anyone have advice/preference?
Big sky, best advanced terrain. pretty decent park. huge resort, kinda reminds me of Jackson hole.
Definitey big sky
Get the Bronze pass to Big Sky (399) and a Mid week pass to Bridger (399), Only $200 more than just a Bridger Seasons and you are styling at both. They are both so different and both so epic that you can;t have just one. Big Sky sometimes only gets really good in that late spring window that you get with the bronze. Make sure you get a friend or two to do the same thing and you will have people on the same program.
RailersailerBig sky, best advanced terrain. pretty decent park. huge resort, kinda reminds me of Jackson hole.Definitey big sky
This...with the addition of Moonlight, the terrain is way bigger. Bridger is fun too, but if you're talking the most terrain, gotta go BigSky.
Bridger has the ridge and once you're up there, the crowds don't matter. The Bridger Cloud sits there for days and just dumps and dumps. Big Sky is too windy to ever hold any snow on top of all those fucking rocks.
Both are fucking awesome, I miss skiing in MT. Bridger is great because its so close but definitely is 1/4 the size of big sky. Both places have a terrain park, but big skys is infinitely better (it was a few years ago, assuming the same now) and moonlight always had a fun park too. Both places will get crowded but BB definitely has lines on a pow day, but big sky will too.
Either way, you'll have a great time. Id suggest buying the same pass as a few friends around school because then you can car pool, etc.
Bridger has a lot of good terrain in a small area. Big sky has just as much if not more and its all spread out.
Bridger is like mid vail at the base on the weekends, and big sky never gets too crowded.
Bridgers park has good ideas, but they never execute or maintain, also the one jump is literally a jump for ants. Big sky's parks are always well maintained, but for no reason all spread out everywhere, like a long rail yard, then a small park. And then there are four jumps just in the middle of a run for example.
Big sky's powder stays around for a much longer time then compared to Bridger.
and a full season pass for both places cost the same, at this moment.
I like big sky better, I think its better for a full ski day rather than bridger, but i don't mind going out to ride the park at bridger for a half day.
Bridger. Big sky has the size, and it got even bigger for this season, but bridger has amazing terrain off the ridge and over in schlashmans. Bridger wins out for me because it is so close to town. I don't know if youre going to be a college student next year, but last year I was able to rack up so much time on skis because I was able to leave at noon after my morning classes were done, and get back into town before my 5:00 class.
Tree60Bridger. Big sky has the size, and it got even bigger for this season, but bridger has amazing terrain off the ridge and over in schlashmans. Bridger wins out for me because it is so close to town. I don't know if youre going to be a college student next year, but last year I was able to rack up so much time on skis because I was able to leave at noon after my morning classes were done, and get back into town before my 5:00 class.
double post. I was able to do that, get 3 and a half hours of skiing, and be able to get back and shower before class.