I don't really give a shit about the name of the party. If you ask me I'd say liberal (since I'm not american I'm talking in largely general terms, when I say liberal or conservative I do not mean the political entities, rather the fundamental principles that the party is based around), but this is purely because liberal governments allow for more progression. Take climate change for example, evidence is 100% certain it's happening and 96% certain it's vastly accelerated by humans. Instead of standing down and denying it or waving it off as a political tool, a good liberal party will adapt.
Changing the topic, let's talk crime, specifically reoffender rates. Bastoey, Norway: 16%, by far the lowest in the world. The US: 67% within three years, over 80% after 5. UK: 90%. Norway has the most progressive attitude towards rehabilitation in the world, and it shows. There's no way to spin such a low reoffender rate as bad. The biggest criticism of the Norwegian model is that it seams to cushy, it doesn't seem like punishment. If you think about the long term that seems irrelevant - criminals don't just become criminals on there own, crime is almost socially acceptable because it is so prevalent. To cut the reoffender rate is to cut the overall crime rate, to reduce the culture of crime. The Netherlands have a similar prison system, and they're closing prisons.
I accept that this system is not proven in large populations, but to ignore the successes of this system just to carry on using a failing system is moronic. It's tough to argue that the American and British prison systems aren't failing, 80% and 90% are huge numbers. Only 20% of those who leave an American prison will still be out in five years, that's failure. It's worse in Britain. My point is that a conservative attitude does not fix things. Treating the prison system purely as a form of punishment has failed, it's hard to argue that it isn't. A progressive attitude is required if crime rates are to fall and stay down.
The tech industry is booming. I used to read science fiction books about virtual reality headsets, look at Oculus rift. Technology has very visibly progressed, and it has changed our lives. Has it improved our lives: that's highly questionable, but it's a different discussion. It's certainly done little positive: education quality is falling, crime rates are still abysmal and welfare is in shit. Progression in tech has not bought the country (US and UK) out of the mid 1900s.
Progression based on research will improve the country. It will lower crime rates, lower pollution, provide better education, better welfare systems, the list could go on for quite a while. So you ask about my political orientation, and I'd say I'm anything but a conservative. Things need to change. That said, liberal parties in the US and the UK do little to impress me, they seem to be just as far detached from reality as all the other politicians. They see progression as big things, such as inventing a new source of energy such as nuclear fusion*, when many small steps are far more likely to have a big effect.
*The UK has announced they're going to build a fusion reactor (sort of). Huge problem here: the technology they want to imply is purely theoretical and has a massive chance of failure. Instead of spending the money on research that might go somewhere they did something that the uneducated masses will see as a step forward, when in reality it's just a flashy waste of money.