GnarcotiksCouldnt they just do a study on the survivability but have it done by a third party. Take 1000 slides that caught people. Figure out the number who had ABS bags and the number that didnt. Then take that and find the probability of surviving an avalanche with the use of ABS or not.
Yeah your totally right. Metadata studies are a really good place to start. They are cheap. Provided you get some really good data it can go a long way. But the problem is that metadata studies is that, by their very nature, struggle with controlling for/ eliminating confounding variables.
For example... more serious and talented skiers may be more likely to use air bags AND encounter more dangerous train then the non-air bag counter-parts. So Better skiers (that wear air bags more often) may have more experience in getting away safe in avey situations. As you might be able to see, theres lots of factors that can skew stats when looking at previous numbers.
Also, we cannot be sure if people were using air bags appropriately. even though that is relevant, numbers representing user outcomes may speak more to proper use rather than the effectiveness of a properly deployed air bag itself
Dr.DealgoodThis is the only more "academic" research I know of pertaining to airbags.
It's a good read and points out what should be obvious: technology isn't just going to magically save you in the mountains.
Word, ill read this guy tomorrow when i have time. Looks pretty interesting